%0 Journal Article
%T Regional differences of fat depot attenuation using non
%A Alejandro Deviggiano
%A Carlos Capunay
%A Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo
%A Macarena De Zan
%A Patricia Carrascosa
%J Acta Radiologica
%@ 1600-0455
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/0284185118787356
%X Regional fat density assessed by computed tomography (CT) has been suggested as a marker of perivascular adipose tissue inflammation. Dual energy CT (DECT) allows improved tissue characterization compared to conventional CT. To explore whether DECT might aid regional fat density discrimination. We included patients who had completed a non-enhanced cardiac CT scan, CT coronary angiography (CTCA), and a delayed enhancement CT. Attenuation levels (Hounsfield units [HU]) were assessed at the epicardial, paracardial, visceral, and subcutaneous fat. The number of coronary segments with disease (SIS) was calculated. A total of 36 patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-six (72%) patients had evidence of obstructive disease at CCTA and 25 (69%) patients had evidence of previous myocardial infarction. At non-contrast CT, we did not identify significant attenuation differences between epicardial, paracardial, subcutaneous, and visceral fat depots (£¿110.8£¿¡À£¿9 HU, vs. £¿113.7£¿¡À£¿9 HU, vs. £¿114.7£¿¡À£¿8 HU, vs. £¿113.8£¿¡À£¿11 HU, P£¿=£¿0.36). Significant attenuation differences were detected between fat depots at mid and low energy levels, both at CTCA and delayed-enhancement scans (P£¿<£¿0.05 for all). Epicardial fat showed the least negative attenuation, irrespective of the acquisition mode; epicardial fat evaluated at 40£¿keV was related to the SIS (r£¿=£¿0.37, P£¿=£¿0.03). In this study, regional fat depots amenable to examination during thoracic CT scans have distinctive regional attenuation values. Furthermore, such differences were better displayed using contrast-enhanced monochromatic imaging at low energy levels
%K Cardiac
%K CT angiography
%K arteriosclerosis
%K inflammation
%K tissue characterization
%K adipose tissue
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0284185118787356