%0 Journal Article
%T Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter to detect increased intracranial pressure in adults: a meta
%A Eun Pyo Hong
%A Heung Cheol Kim
%A Jin Pyeong Jeon
%A Si Un Lee
%A Sung-Eun Kim
%J Acta Radiologica
%@ 1600-0455
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/0284185118776501
%X The optimal optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) cut-off for identifying increased intracranial pressure (IICP) remains unclear in adult patients. To validate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) ONSD£¿>£¿5.0£¿mm as a cut-off for detecting IICP by computed tomographic (CT) through a meta-analysis. A systemic literature review was performed of online databases from January 1990 to September 2017. A bivariate random-effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) graph was used to provide summary points for sensitivity and specificity. Meta-regression tests were performed to estimate the influence of the study characteristics on DOR. Publication bias was assessed using Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test. Six studies with 352 patients were included in the meta-analysis. US ONSD£¿>£¿5.0£¿mm revealed pooled sensitivity of 99% (95% CI£¿=£¿96¨C100) and specificity of 73% (95% CI£¿=£¿65¨C80) for IICP detection. DOR was 178. The area under the SROC curve was 0.981, indicating a good level of accuracy. Meta-regression studies showed no significant associations between DOR and study characteristics such as probe mode (relative DOR [RDOR]£¿=£¿0.60; P£¿=£¿0.78), study quality (RDOR£¿=£¿0.52; P£¿=£¿0.67), IICP prevalence (RDOR£¿=£¿0.04; P£¿=£¿0.17), or pathology at admission (RDOR£¿=£¿1.30; P£¿=£¿0.87). US ONSD£¿>£¿5.0£¿mm can be used to rapidly detect IICP in adults in emergency departments and intensive care units. Further meta-analysis based on individual patient-level databases is needed to confirm these results
%K Optic nerve sheath diameter
%K intracranial pressure
%K computed tomography
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0284185118776501