%0 Journal Article
%T Autonomy, trust and ante
%A Sarah-Jane Brown
%J Clinical Ethics
%@ 1758-101X
%D 2018
%R 10.1177/1477750918772264
%X Over the last few years, policies have been introduced in the UK that identify and treat patients as potential organ donors before death. Patients incapacitated due to catastrophic brain injury may now undergo intensive ante-mortem interventions to improve the chances of successfully transplanting their organs into third parties after death. The most significant ethical and legal problem with these policies is that they are not based on the individual¡¯s specific wishes in the circumstances. Policy-makers appear reluctant to inform potential registrants on the Organ Donor Register about ante-mortem donor optimisation procedures and to provide an opportunity to record specific wishes in advance. They are reliant on blind trust in the organ donation programme, which as I argue in this paper, presents significant risks for the achievement of its aim of securing an adequate supply of organs for transplantation. I argue that informed trust, based on accurate information about the future consequences of registration, is a more stable and enduring form of trust in the long term and would provide that sense of security in one¡¯s expectations that often appears to be missing in relation to organ donation
%K Trust
%K autonomy
%K organ donation
%K donor optimisation
%K distrust
%K blind trust
%K informed trust
%K organ procurement policy
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1477750918772264