%0 Journal Article
%T Vexed Again: Social Scientists and the Revision of the Common Rule, 2011
%A Zachary M. Schrag
%J The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
%@ 1748-720X
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/1073110519857281
%X In revising the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (Common Rule) between 2009 and 2018, regulators devoted the vast bulk of their attention to debates over biomedical research. They lacked both expertise in and concern about the social sciences and humanities, yet they imposed their will on experts in those fields. The revision process was secretive, spasmodic, and unrepresentative, especially compared to rulemaking in Canada, where social scientists participate in the process, and revisions take place every few years. The result was a final rule that offers some wins for social science and the humanities, but that fails to solve the problems identified by Ezekiel Emanuel and in the 2011 advance notice of proposed rulemaking
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1073110519857281