%0 Journal Article
%T Affinity and antagonism: Structuralism, comparison and transformation in pluralist political ontology
%A Ben Turner
%J Philosophy & Social Criticism
%@ 1461-734X
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/0191453718797985
%X This article develops a comparative and recursive approach to political ontology by drawing on the ontological turn in anthropology. It claims that if ontological commitments define reality, then the use of ontology by recent pluralist political theorists must undercut pluralism. By charting contemporary anthropology¡¯s rereading of structuralism as part of a plural understanding of ontology, it will be shown that any political ontology places limits on the political, and thus cannot exhaust political experience. This position will be established through an analysis of the role of Claude L¨¦vi-Strauss in the work of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe and a comparison with the political ontology represented by perspectivism and potential affinity. Anthropology¡¯s lesson for political theory is that ontology cannot simply be revised and treated in the singular, but that political ontologies must be analysed comparatively to reveal the shortcomings of, and recursively alter, one¡¯s own political frame of reference
%K anthropology
%K Chantal Mouffe
%K Claude L¨¦vi-Strauss
%K Eduardo Viveiros de Castro
%K Ernesto Laclau
%K ontological turn
%K Philippe Descola
%K pluralism
%K political ontology
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0191453718797985