%0 Journal Article
%T The Hans Eysenck affair: Time to correct the scientific record
%A David F Marks
%J Journal of Health Psychology
%@ 1461-7277
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/1359105318820931
%X The Journal of Health Psychology publishes here Dr Anthony Pelosi¡¯s analysis of questionable science by one of the world¡¯s best-known psychologists, the late Professor Hans J Eysenck. The provenance of a huge body of data produced by Eysenck and Ronald Grossarth-Maticek is highly controversial. In Open letters to King¡¯s College London and the British Psychological Society, this editor is requesting a thorough investigation of the facts together with retraction or correction of 61 publications. Academic institutions have a conflict of interest concerning allegations of misconduct, which is why I believe that the only way forward is to have a National Research Integrity Ombudsperson to investigate allegations
%K cancer
%K CHD
%K correction
%K Hans J Eysenck
%K personality
%K psychotherapy
%K questionable science
%K research integrity
%K retraction
%K smoking
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1359105318820931