%0 Journal Article
%T Public Campaign Financing, Candidate Socioeconomic Diversity, and Representational Inequality at the U.S. State Level: Evidence from Connecticut
%A Mitchell Kilborn
%J State Politics & Policy Quarterly
%@ 1946-1607
%D 2018
%R 10.1177/1532440018784980
%X Conventional wisdom holds that public campaign financing can diversify the socioeconomic makeup of candidate pools and, therefore, of U.S. elected officials, which could make U.S. public policy more responsive to lower socioeconomic status (SES) citizens. I argue that in addition to the absence of a positive relationship between public financing and candidate socioeconomic diversity, public financing, depending on the program design, may, in fact, reduce candidate socioeconomic diversity. Using occupational data on state legislative candidates in public financing state Connecticut and two paired control states to execute a difference in difference analysis, I demonstrate that when public financing is available, fewer low SES candidates run for state legislative office, and those who do run are not more likely to win and are less likely to utilize public financing
%K campaign finance
%K political behavior
%K political participation
%K representation
%K legislative elections
%K legislative politics
%K elections
%K election rules
%K poverty/inequality
%K public policy
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1532440018784980