%0 Journal Article
%T Constituent power and civil disobedience: Beyond the nation
%A William E Scheuerman
%J Journal of International Political Theory
%@ 1755-1722
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/1755088218806642
%X Radical democratic political theorists have used the concept of constituent power to sketch ambitious models of radical democracy, while many legal scholars deploy it to make sense of the political and legal dynamics of constitutional politics. Its growing popularity notwithstanding, I argue that the concept tends to impede a proper interpretation of civil disobedience, conceived as nonviolent, politically motivated lawbreaking evincing basic respect for law. Contemporary theorists who employ it cannot distinguish between civil disobedience and other related, yet ultimately different, modes of political illegality (e.g. conscientious objection, resistance, revolution). The essay also examines J¨šrgen HabermasĄ¯ recent contributions to a theory of mixed or dualistic (postnational) constituent power, conceding that Habermas avoids many theoretical and political ills plaguing competing radical democratic theoretical retrievals. Nonetheless, HabermasĄ¯ attempt to salvage the idea of constituent power as part of his reformist agenda for the European Union not only breaks with his earlier understandable skepticism about the idea but also risks trimming the admirably ambitious sails of his radical democratic interpretation of civil disobedience
%K Civil disobedience
%K constituent power
%K European Union
%K J¨šrgen Habermas
%K resistance
%K revolution
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1755088218806642