%0 Journal Article
%T The Reasonable Person Standard for Research Disclosure: A Reasonable Addition to the Common Rule
%A Rebecca Dresser
%J The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
%@ 1748-720X
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/1073110519857275
%X The revised Common Rule adopts the reasonable person standard to guide research disclosure. Some members of the research community contend that the standard is confusing and ill-suited to the research oversight system. Yet the revised rule is not as radical as it might seem. During the 1970s, judges started using the standard to evaluate negligence claims brought by injured patients who said doctors had failed to obtain informed consent to the harmful procedures. In its influential Belmont Report, the National Commission recommended application of a ¡°reasonable volunteer standard¡± to guide IRBs evaluating research disclosures. Evidence also suggests that IRBs often invoke the reasonable person standard in deliberations about consent forms. But past application of the standard has been informal and uneven. Robust application of the reasonable person standard will require researchers and IRBs to learn more about what ordinary people want and need to know about the studies they are invited to join. Input from people with personal experience as study participants could be particularly useful to this effort
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1073110519857275