%0 Journal Article
%T A ADMISSIBILIDADE DOS EMBARGOS DE DIVERG¨ēNCIA
%A Guilherme Pizzotti
%A Rodrigo Tannuri
%A Matheus Sanches
%J Revista da ESDM
%P 7-21
%@ 2595-7589
%D 2020
%R 10.29282/esdm.v6i11
%X This article aims to discuss the admissibility of the motion for reconsideration due to a split decision and Brazilian Federal Constitution. The analysis starts with brief considerations about this appeal type and from clarifications about its intimate relationship with article 926 of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code, which provides for the need for the courts to standardize their jurisprudence, keeping it integral, stable and consistent. The article also establishes a comparison between the current Civil Procedure Code and the previous legislation, and then discuss the vetoes promoted by Law 12.256/2016. In the end, a critical analysis will be made of the vetoes and their consequences for Brazilian civil procedural legislation.
%K Brazilian Civil Procedure Code. Motion for reconsideration due to a split decision. Article 926. Law 12.256/2016.
%U http://revista.esdm.com.br/index.php/esdm/article/view/132/103