%0 Journal Article %T Conjugate Heat Transfer Predictions of Gas Turbine Hot Walls Jets Cooling: Influence of Short Hole Grid Resolutions Using Computational Fluid Dynamics* %A Abubakar M. El-Jummah %A Shehu A. Abdulrahman %A Alhaji S. Grema %J Journal of Power and Energy Engineering %P 1-16 %@ 2327-5901 %D 2023 %I Scientific Research Publishing %R 10.4236/jpee.2023.1110001 %X Short hole investigations relevant to gas turbine (GT) hot walls cooling heat transfer techniques, were carried out using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) combined with conjugate heat transfer (CHT) code. The CFD software are commercial ones: ICEM for grid modelling and ANSYS Fluent for the numerical calculation, where symmetrical application prevails. The CFD CHT predictions were undertaken for Nimonic-75 metal walls with square (152.4 mm) arrays of 10 holes, whereby the lumped heat capacitance method was applied in order to determine the surface average heat transfer coefficient (HTC), h (W/m² K) and the dimensionless Nusselt number, Nu. The major parameters considered for the short hole geometries are the pitch to diameter, X/D and length to diameter, L/D ratios and both were varied with range of D values, but X of 15.24 mm and L of 6.35 mm kept constant. Also applied, are variable mass flux, G (kg/s∙m²) and were used in predicting the flow aerodynamics in the short holes. The predictions were for classic thermal entry length into a round hole, as vena contracta, flow separation and reattachment dominates the holes, hence the development of thermal profile through the depth of the GT hot walls. Additionally, the acceleration of the flow along the wall surfaces as it approaches the holes, was a significant part of the overall heat transfer. This was shown to be independent of the hole length, even though the L/D parameter is a critical component to enhanced heat transfer. The CFD CHT predictions showed that validation of the HTC h, Nu and pressure loss, ∆P are in better agreement with measured data and within reasonable acceptance. The ∆P agreement signifies that the aerodynamics were predicted correctly, which is also the reason why the HTC expressed per wall hole approach surface area and Nu were better predicted. This illustrates how effective and %K Lumped Heat Capacitance %K Thermal Entry Length %K Symmetrical Application %K Flow Separation %K Flow Reattachment %U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=128972