%0 Journal Article
%T Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Methodothologies¡ªA Review
%A Gregory Mwenketishi
%A Hadj Benkreira
%A Nejat Rahmanian
%J American Journal of Climate Change
%P 579-627
%@ 2167-9509
%D 2023
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ajcc.2023.124026
%X The process of capturing and storing carbon dioxide (CCS) was previously considered a crucial and time-sensitive approach for diminishing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions originating from coal, oil, and gas sectors. Its implementation was seen necessary to address the detrimental effects of CO<sub>2</sub> on the atmosphere and the ecosystem. This recognition was achieved by previous substantial study efforts. The carbon capture and storage (CCS) cycle concludes with the final stage of CO<sub>2</sub> storage. This stage involves primarily the adsorption of CO<sub>2</sub> in the ocean and the injection of CO<sub>2</sub> into subsurface reservoir formations. Additionally, the process of CO<sub>2</sub> reactivity with minerals in the reservoir formations leads to the formation of limestone through injectivities. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is the final phase in the CCS cycle, mostly achieved by the use of marine and underground geological sequestration methods, along with mineral carbonation techniques. The introduction of supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> into geological formations has the potential to alter the prevailing physical and chemical characteristics of the subsurface environment. This process can lead to modifications in the pore fluid pressure, temperature conditions, chemical reactivity, and stress distribution within the reservoir rock. The objective of this study is to enhance our existing understanding of CO<sub>2</sub> injection and storage systems, with a specific focus on CO<sub>2</sub> storage techniques and the associated issues faced during their implementation. Additionally, this research examines strategies for mitigating important uncertainties in carbon capture and storage (CCS) practises. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities can be considered as integrated systems. However, in scientific research, these storage systems are often divided based on the physical and spatial scales relevant to the investigations. Utilising the chosen system as a boundary condition is a highly effective method for segregating the physics in a diverse range of physical applications. Regrettably, the used separation technique fails to effectively depict the behaviour of the broader significant system in the context of water and gas movement within porous media. The limited efficacy of the technique in capturing the behaviour of the broader relevant system can be attributed to the intricate nature of geological subsurface systems. As a result, various carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies have emerged, each with distinct applications, associated
%K Aquifer
%K Carbon Subsurface Storage (CSS)
%K CO2 Sequestration
%K Environment
%K Geological Storage
%K Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=129308