%0 Journal Article
%T Postoperative Analgesia and Cesarean Section under General Anesthesia: Multicenter Study
%A Ghislain Edjo Nkilly
%A Raphael Okoue Ondo
%A Pascal Christian Nze Obiang
%A St¨¦phane Oliveira
%A Jean-Marcel Mandji-Lawson
%A Romain Tchoua
%J Open Journal of Anesthesiology
%P 1-12
%@ 2164-5558
%D 2024
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ojanes.2024.141001
%X <b>Background:</b> Neuraxial anesthesia with intrathecal morphine is the reference technique in cesarean section anesthesia for the management of postoperative analgesia. If there is a contraindication to this, general anesthesia is required. The objective of the study was to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of 4 analgesic techniques performed during cesarean section under general anesthesia in two centers with different anesthetic practices (North Franche Comt&eacute; Hospital and Omar Bongo Ondimba Army Training Hospital). <b>Method:</b> This is a retrospective and descriptive study over 2 years, from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. It involved evaluating the analgesic effectiveness and tolerance of morphine in the epidural catheter, wound infiltration, intravenous analgesia and Transversus Abdominous Plane block (TAP block) from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) until the 4<sup>th</sup> post-operative day. <b>Results:</b> Of the 354 cesarean sections performed, 84 (11.14%) received general anesthesia. The average age was 32.27 years. Acute fetal distress was the first indication for cesarean section (45.2%), followed by hemorrhagic placenta previa (10.7%) and prolapse of the cord (8.33%). Morphine in the epidural catheter was the most used (47.6%) followed by parietal infiltration (36.9%), intravenous analgesia (13.1%) and TAP block (2.38%). The analgesic effectiveness was comparable between the techniques from postoperative day 0 to day 4. No difference in side effects. Postoperative morphine consumption was significantly reduced (p = 0.011) in the infiltration (9 mg) and TAP block (9mg) groups compared to the epidural catheter (16 mg) and intravenous analgesia (17 mg). No difference in 02 rehabilitation criteria (ambulation, first bowel movement). No difference in the occurrence of chronic pain. <b>Conclusion:</b> In the event of a cesarean section under general anesthesia, there are effective and well-tolerated alternatives to neuraxial anesthesia, particularly regional anesthesia techniques (nerve blocks), particularly in countries with low availability of morphine.
%K Cesarean
%K General Anesthesia
%K Morphine
%K Parietal Infiltration
%K Epidural  Catheter
%K Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
%K Intravenous Analgesia
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=130434