%0 Journal Article
%T The Trademark of Idealist Philosophy
%A N¨¢ndor Sztank¨®
%J Open Journal of Philosophy
%P 146-151
%@ 2163-9442
%D 2024
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ojpp.2024.141012
%X Natural sciences are credited with being the chief force in the process of rendering relative many elements of our world view. To make acceptable the relative character of the order of two poles for the public, however, is the task of (idealist) philosophy. I reduce the division of objective/subjective to sensible duality. To explain the belief in sensible duality, I use unusual means: personifying the sensible content. It is the distinction between present (as extension) and absolute present (as the absence of extension), which I call the trademark of idealist philosophy. This distinction is based on the striking assertion that though finite time can be divided infinitely, but at the same time, this division is not permitted to be performed, protecting the conceptual substance. The noninfinite division of finite time results in the definition: present = an extension-atom. This short extension is an important component of the notion ¡°original environment¡±. The message ¡°total nonuniversality¡± does not exist without that ¡°place¡±.
%K Hegel
%K Total Universality
%K Total Nonuniversality
%K Present
%K Absolute Present
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=131241