%0 Journal Article
%T 郑熊《番禺杂记》相关问题考证<br>A Textual Research on the Related Issues of Zheng Xiong’s “<i>Panyu</i><i> </i><i>Za</i><i> </i><i>Ji</i>”
%A 李代玥
%J Chinese Traditional Culture
%P 268-272
%@ 2332-6824
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/cnc.2024.122044
%X 郑熊所著《番禺杂记》虽已佚，但仍有《说郛》的辑录版本，同时其书中内容也多为其他史书所引。通过对各类史籍的引用和比对，可知《番禺杂编》《番禺杂志》《番禺记》以及《番禺杂录》应为《番禺杂记》的不同名称，而郑熊应为北宋初年人，因其书中有南汉时期的记载。《番禺杂记》对岭南地区的风俗习惯、山川景物、海洋信仰等方面有详细的记录，这为了解唐五代时期岭南历史文化提供了珍贵的资料。而对《番禺杂记》的考证，不仅有助于恢复和完善这部佚书的内容，也有助于揭示岭南地区的历史变迁和文化特色。<br />
Zheng Xiong’s “<i>Panyu</i><i> </i><i>Za</i><i> </i><i>Ji</i>” has been lost, but there are still the edited versions of “<i>Shuo</i><i> Fu</i>”. At the same time, the contents of his book are also quoted by many other historical books. Through the comparison and reference of various historical books, it can be known that “<i>Panyu</i><i> </i><i>Za</i><i> </i><i>Bian</i>”, “<i>Panyu</i><i> </i><i>Za</i><i> </i><i>Zhi</i>”, “<i>Panyu</i><i> </i><i>Ji</i>” and “<i>Panyu</i><i> </i><i>Za</i><i> Lu</i>” should be different names of “<i>Panyu</i><i> </i><i>Za</i><i> </i><i>Ji</i>”, and Zheng Xiong should be a person in the early Northern Song Dynasty, because his book has records of the Southern Han period. “<i>Panyu</i><i> </i><i>Za</i><i> </i><i>Ji</i>” has detailed records of the customs, landscapes, and marine beliefs of the Lingnan region, which provides valuable information for understanding the history and culture of the Lingnan region during the Tang and Five Dynasties periods. And the textual research on “<i>Panyu</i><i> </i><i>Za</i><i> </i><i>Ji</i>” not only helps to restore and improve the content of this lost book, but also helps to reveal the historical changes and cultural characteristics of the Lingnan region.
%K 《番禺杂记》，郑熊，书名<br>“<i>Panyu</i><i> </i><i>Za</i><i> </i><i>Ji</i>”
%K Zheng Xiong
%K Book Title
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=84963