%0 Journal Article
%T The “Right to Die” through the Prism of Medical Philosophy
%A Sawadogo Joseph
%J Open Journal of Philosophy
%P 488-497
%@ 2163-9442
%D 2024
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ojpp.2024.142031
%X The prohibition on administering lethal medication to a patient can be found in the first code of medical deontology (450 BC), which calls on doctors to practice their art with purity and piety. Today, in some countries, doctors are faced with an ethical and deontological dilemma: patients or their relatives request deep and continuous sedation in the name of the “right to die”, believing their life to be inhuman and unworthy! The very concept of the “right to die” is a complex and delicate subject, undefined and un-framed by law. However, it is often discussed in the context of individual rights and medical ethics, often leaving the physician torn on one side by compassion and a sense of medical duty to alleviate a patient’s unnecessary suffering. The “right to die” is an ethical and legal concept that supports the freedom of a human being who is incurably ill or “tired of living” to end his or her life, or to obtain the necessary assistance to do so, by refusing treatment. Yet the universal Hippocratic law that underpins medical practice formally prohibits doctors from assisting suicide. This prohibition is based on the physician’s commitment to defending and preserving life until its natural end. The aim of this study was to see in what sense we can speak of a “right to die” in the philosophy of medicine, so that death can be experienced with humanity and dignity, even by means of deep and continuous sedation. The subject is all the more topical as this right is claimed in the name of human dignity and individual rights and freedoms.
%K Right to Death
%K Hippocratic Law
%K Dysthanasia
%K Euthanasia
%K Palliative Care
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=133317