%0 Journal Article
%T Pressure Measurements from Five Different Nosebands at Rest, and During Riding at Walk, a Collected Gait, Backing up and a Full Stop
%A Adrian Harrison
%J Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine
%P 137-154
%@ 2165-3364
%D 2024
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ojvm.2024.146010
%X Background: Scientific procedures for addressing noseband fit and tightness, eliminating the risk of excessive and painful tightening, as well as quantitative measurements of pressures under the noseband while riding are either scarce or lacking. Purpose/Aim: To assess simple means of measuring pressure under different nosebands with a view to their adoption as scientific methodology. Method: Horses (n = 7) were fitted with five different bridles (A-E). Pressure distribution and intensity were measured using colour sensitive film (Fujifilm LLLW), assessing the level of pressure and distribution across the surface of the nosebands, as assessed and ranked by independent assessors. A CURO system was also used to measure pressure in real-time under nosebands whilst riding. Results: The colour-sensitive film for D & B were ranked 1st and 2nd, respectively. Regularity of pressure overall showed a statistical difference between nosebands (A & B significantly more unregular than the others). Pressure measurements revealed significantly different means (all P < 0.0001, except for B vs D and C vs E which were not significant; A (24.14 kPa), B (33.99 kPa), C (29.46 kPa ), D (25.33 kPa) and E (30.26 kPa). Conclusions: Pressures under nosebands can reach levels that appear capable of inflicting tissue damage, hence bridles and nosebands should be assessed using scientific methodology and not based on arbitrary and subjective criteria, as is currently the case.
%K Noseband
%K Welfare
%K Pain
%K Bridle Fit
%K Riding
%K Tö
%K lt
%K FEI
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=134057