%0 Journal Article
%T Brain Research on Mental Disorders: A Criticism
%A John R. Rossiter
%J Open Journal of Medical Psychology
%P 71-85
%@ 2165-9389
%D 2024
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ojmp.2024.133006
%X <b>Objective:</b> To expose the problems and inherent limitations of neuroscience-based brain research on mental disorders. <b>Method:</b> Discussion of the theory underlying brain research on mental disorders, followed by a systematic evaluation of typical studies. <b>Results:</b> The fundamental problem is that brain researchers fail to differentiate between biological mental disorders in which brain processes cause the disorder (notably schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and melancholic depression) and learned mental disorders in which brain processes mediate but do not cause the disorder (which is the case with reactive depression, reactive anxiety, OCD, and PTSD). Researchers have been unsuccessful in identifying mechanisms in the brain that cause biological mental disorders, and will never be able to locate the innumerable specific neural connections that mediate learned mental disorders. Moreover, the author&#8217;s review of typical studies in this field shows that they have serious problems with theory, measurement, and data analysis, and that their findings cannot be trusted. <b>Conclusions:</b> Neuroscience-based brain research on mental disorders, unlike other neurological research, has been an expensive failure and it is not worth continuing.
%K Neuroscience-Based Brain Research
%K Biological Mental Disorders
%K Learned Mental Disorders
%K Research Problems
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=134803