%0 Journal Article
%T £¿Puede la ciencia decidir el resultado del debate realismo-antirrealismo?: El papel de los modelos y las teor¨ªas en la metodolog¨ªa de la f¨ªsica
%A Rivadulla Rodr¨ªguez
%A Andr¨¦s
%J Discusiones Filos¨®ficas
%D 2011
%I Scientific Electronic Library Online
%X the question that gives title to this article can be shocking. however, it is not an easy question if we realize that this debate is a dispute typical of the philosophy of science. to carry out my task, i will begin with a reference to paul thagard, from his book computational philosophy of science. in fact, this will allow me to focus in the debate between typical scientific realism and structural realism, a new form of scientific realism that comes from john worrall in the late 80's, and to explore whether it is able to survive the attacks from anti-realist positions. john worrall proclaimed himself as an alternative to typical scientific realism while a viable form of realism. but if the basic tenets of structural realism are false, as i shall try to show based in the physical theories, we have to conclude that the attempts of structural realism to resurrect realism have failed.
%K science
%K physics
%K models and theories
%K realism-antirealism
%K typical realism
%K structural realism.
%U http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0124-61272011000200007&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en