Planners, designers, citizens, and governmental agencies are interested in creating environments that are sustainable and fulfill a wide range of economic, ecological, aesthetic, functional, and cultural expectations for stakeholders. There are numerous approaches and proposals to create such environments. One vision is the 1934 “Broadacre City” proposed by Frank Lloyd Wright for the Taliesin, Wisconsin area that was never implemented. Frank Lloyd Wright’s vision integrated transportation, housing, commercial, agricultural, and natural areas in a highly diverse pattern forming a vast urban savanna complex. He also applied his “Broadacre City” idea to the 1942 Cooperative Homesteads Community Project in Detroit, Michigan, another un-built project. This vision concerning the composition of the urban environment may be conceptually realized in the ongoing gray-field reclamation in suburban Detroit, Michigan. Recent science-based investigations, concerning the metrics to measure and evaluate the quality of designed spaces, suggest that this “Broadacre City” approach may have great merit and is highly preferred over past spatial treatments (p ≤ 0.05). These metrics explain 67 to 80% of the variance concerning stakeholder expectations and are highly definitive (p < 0.001).
References
[1]
Loures, L. Planning and Design in Postindustrial Land Transformation: East Bank Arade River, Lagoa—Case Study; Ph.D. Dissertation; Faculdade de Ciencias e Technologia, Universdidade do Algarve: Faro, Portugal, 2010.
[2]
Turner, T. City as Landscape: A Post-Postmodern View of Design and Planning; E & FN Spon: London, UK, 1996.
[3]
Burley, J.; Wang, Y.; Loures, L. New ecologies: Emergence of the urban savanna and cliff detritus in a post post-modern era. In New Models for Innovative Management and Urban Dynamics; Panagopoulos, T., Ed.; Universidade do Algarve: Faro, Portugal, 2009; pp. 13–22.
[4]
Aguar, C.E.; Aguar, B. Wrightscapes: Frank Lloyd Wright's Landscape Designs; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2002.
[5]
Mo, F.; Burley, J.B. Visual and environmental quality perception and preference in the People's Republic of China. Advances In Urban Rehabilitation and Sustainability 3rd WSEAS International Conference on Urban Rehabilitation And Sustainability (URES '10), 3 November–5 November 2010; Panagopoulos, T., Noronha, T., Beltrao, J., Eds.; Universidade do Algarve: Faro, Portugal; pp. 99–103.
[6]
Burley, J.B. The restored Bauhaus in Dessau, Germany. In International Practice Professional Practice Network March 2008 Newsletter; American Society of Landscape Architects: Washington DC, USA, 2008; pp. 15–16.
Newton, N.T. Design on the Land; The Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1971.
[9]
McHarg, I.L. Design with Nature; Doubleday/Natural History Press: New York, NY, USA, 1969.
[10]
Laurie, M. An Introduction to Landscape Architecture, 2nd ed. ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986.
[11]
Rutz, M.E. Public Gardens of Michigan; Michigan State University Press: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2002.
[12]
Jagenow, C. Urban agriculture: A growing trend. Sites 2011, 5(2), 2–6.
[13]
Taylor, J.G.; Zube, E.H.; Sell, J.L. Landscape assessment and perception research methods. In Environmental and Behavioral Research; Van Nostrand Reinhold Company: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 361–393.
[14]
Smardon, R.C.; Palmer, J.E.; Felleman, J.P. Foundations For Visual Project Analysis; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1986.
[15]
Jones & Jones. In Visual Impact Assessment for Highway Projects; U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, National Highway Institute and Office of Environmental Policy: Washington DC, USA, 1981.
[16]
Burley, J.B. Visual and ecological environmental quality model for transportation planning and design. TRR: J. Transp. Res. Board 1997, 1549, 54–60.
[17]
Kaplan, R.; Kaplan, S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989.
[18]
Kaplan, R.; Kaplan, S.; Ryan, R. With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
[19]
Mo, F.; LeCleach, G.; Sales, M.; Deyong, G.; Burley, J.B. Visual and environmental quality perception and preference in the People's Republic of China, France, and Portugal. Int. J. Energ. Environ. 2011, 4(5), 549–557.
[20]
Burley, J.B. The science of design: Green vegetation and flowering plants do make a difference: Quantifying visual quality. The Michigan Landscape 2006, 49(8), 27–30.
[21]
Thayer, R. Gray World, Green Heart: Technology, Nature and Landscape Sustainability; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1994.
