We introduce the term metacity as a conceptual framework that can be shared by ecologists and designers and applied across the wide variety of urban habitats found around the world. While the term metacity was introduced by UN-HABITAT to designate hyper cities of over twenty million people, for us it is not limited to large urban agglomerations, but rather refers to the proliferation of new forms of urbanization, each with distinct ecological and social attributes. These various urban configurations when combined with new digital sensing, communication and social networking technologies constitute a virtual meta-infrastructure, present in all cities today. This new metacity has the potential to integrate new activist forms of ecological and urban design research and practice in making the transition from sanitary to sustainable city models globally. The city of Baltimore, Maryland will be used both as a site to illustrate these recent urban trends, and also as an example of the integration of ecology and urban design pursued by the two authors over the past seven years [1,2]. Metacity theory is drawn from both an architectural analysis of contemporary forms of urbanism, new forms of digital monitoring and communication technologies, as well as metapopulation and metacommunity theories in ecology. We seek to provide tools and lessons from our experiences for realizing an integrated metacity approach to achieving social sustainability and ecological resilience on an increasingly urbanized planet.
References
[1]
Baltimore Ecosystem Study, www.beslter.org, a Long Term Ecological Research project funded by the National Science Foundation
[2]
Designing Patch Dynamics; Marshall, V., McGrath, B., Towers, J., Plunz, R., Eds.; Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, Preservation and Planning: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
[3]
United Nations. Urbanization: Mega & Metacities, New City States. UN-HABITAT: State of the World's Cities 2006/7; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
[4]
United Nations Population Fund. State of World Population 2007: Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth; United Nations Population Fund: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
[5]
Andersson, E. Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(1), 34.
[6]
Bontje, M. Facing the challenge of shrinking cities in East Germany: The case of Leipzig. GeoJournal 2004, 61(1), 13–21.
[7]
Melosi, M.V. The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from Colonial Times to the Present; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2000.
[8]
Boone, C.G.; Modarres, A. City and Environment; Temple University Press: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006.
[9]
Grove, J.M. Cities Managing densely settled social-ecological systems. In Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World; Chapin, F.S., III, Kofinas, G.P., Folke, C., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 281–294.
[10]
Pincetl, S. From the sanitary to the sustainable city: Challenges to institutionalizing biogenic (nature's services) infrastructure. Local Environ. 2010, 15(1), 43–58.
[11]
Growing Greener Cities: Urban Sustainability in the Twenty-First Century; Birch, E.L., Wachter, S.M., Eds.; University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2008.
[12]
Levins, R. The strategy of model building in population biology. Am. Sci. 1966, 54, 421–431.
[13]
Hanski, I. Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 9, 131–135.
[14]
Hanski, I.; Gilpin, M.E. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1997; p. 512.
[15]
Pickett, S.T.A.; Cadenasso, M.L.; Jones, C.G. Generation of heterogeneity by organisms: Creation, maintenance, and transformation. In Ecological Consequences of Habitat Heterogeneity, the Annual Symposium of the British Ecological Society; Hutchings, M.L., John, E.A., Stewart, A.J.A., Eds.; Blackwell: London, UK, 2001.
[16]
Wu, J.; Loucks, O.L. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Q. Rev. Biol. 1995, 70, 439–466.
[17]
Cadenasso, M.L.; Pickett, S.T.A.; Weathers, K.C.; Jones, C.G. A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries. BioScience 2003, 53, 750–758.
[18]
Turner, M.G. Landscape ecology: What is the state of the science? Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005, 36, 319–344.
[19]
Cadenasso, M.L.; Pickett, S.T.A. Urban principles for ecological landscape design and management: Scientific fundamentals. CATE 2008, 1(2). Article 4.
[20]
Cadenasso, M.L.; Pickett, S.T.A.; Groffman, P.M.; Band, L.E.; Brush, G.S.; Galvin, M.F.; Grove, J.M.; Hagar, G.; Marshall, V.; McGrath, B.P.; et al. Exchanges across land-water-scape boundaries in urban systems: Strategies for reducing nitrate pollution. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1134, 213–232.
[21]
Forman, R.T.T. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecol. 1995, 10, 133–142.
[22]
Pickett, S.T.A.; Cadenasso, M.L.; Grove, J.M.; Boone, C.G.; Groffman, P.M.; Irwin, E.; Kaushal, S.S.; Marshall, V.; McGrath, B.P.; Nilon, C.H.; et al. Urban ecological systems: Scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92, 331–362.
[23]
Force, J.E.; Machlis, G.E. The human ecosystem. 2. Social indicators in ecosystem management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1997, 10(4), 369–382.
[24]
Machlis, G.E.; Force, J.E.; Burch, W.R. The human ecosystem. 1. The human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1997, 10(4), 347–367.
[25]
Rossi, A. The Architecture of the City; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984.
[26]
Koolhaas, R. Delirious New York; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1978.
[27]
Cronin, W. Nature's Metrolopolis: Chicago and the Great West; W. W. Norton & Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1992.
[28]
Howard, E. Garden Cities of To-Morrow; Farber and Farber: London, UK, 1902.
[29]
Gottmann, J. The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States; The Twentieth Century Fund: New York, NY, USA, 1961.
[30]
Theobald, D.M. Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geogr. Rev. 2001, 91, 544–564.
[31]
Hayward, M.E.; Belfoure, C. The Baltimore Rowhouse; Princeton Architectural Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999.
[32]
Olson, S. Baltimore; Ballinger: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1976.
[33]
McGrath, B.; Shane, D.G. Sensing the 21st century city: Close-up and remote. Archit. Design 2005, 75(6).
[34]
McDonough, T. Situationist Space; 1994; Volume 67.
