The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a correction for annihilation photon attenuation in small objects such as mice is necessary. The attenuation recovery for specific organs and subcutaneous tumors was investigated. A comparison between different attenuation correction methods was performed. Methods: Ten NMRI nude mice with subcutaneous implantation of human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) were scanned consecutively in small animal PET and CT scanners (MicroPET TM Focus 120 and ImTek’s MicroCAT TM II). CT-based AC, PET-based AC and uniform AC methods were compared. Results: The activity concentration in the same organ with and without AC revealed an overall attenuation recovery of 9–21% for MAP reconstructed images, i.e., SUV without AC could underestimate the true activity at this level. For subcutaneous tumors, the attenuation was 13 ± 4% (9–17%), for kidneys 20 ± 1% (19–21%), and for bladder 18 ± 3% (15–21%). The FBP reconstructed images showed almost the same attenuation levels as the MAP reconstructed images for all organs. Conclusions: The annihilation photons are suffering attenuation even in small subjects. Both PET-based and CT-based are adequate as AC methods. The amplitude of the AC recovery could be overestimated using the uniform map. Therefore, application of a global attenuation factor on PET data might not be accurate for attenuation correction.
References
[1]
Rowland, D.J.; Lewis, J.S.; Welch, M.J. Molecular imaging: The application of small animal positron emission tomography. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 2002, 39, 110–115.
[2]
Chow, P.L.; Rannou, F.R.; Chatziioannou, A.F. Attenuation correction for small animal PET tomographs. Phys. Med. Biol. 2005, 50, 1837–1850, doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/8/014.
[3]
Zaidi, H.; Montandon, M.L.; Slosman, D.O. Attenuation compensation in cerebral 3D PET: Effect of the attenuation map on absolute and relative quantitation. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2004, 31, 52–63, doi:10.1007/s00259-003-1325-8.
[4]
Burger, C.; Goerres, G.; Schoenes, S.; Buck, A.; Lonn, A.; von Schulthess, G. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: Experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2002, 29, 922–927, doi:10.1007/s00259-002-0796-3.
Liang, H.; Yang, Y.; Yang, K.; Wu, Y.; Boone, J.M.; Cherry, S.R. A microPET/CT system for in vivo small animal imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52, 3881–3894, doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/015.
[7]
Binderup, T.; H.El-Ali, H.; Ambrosini, V.; Skovgaard, D.; Munk Jensen, M.; Li, F.; Hesse, B.; Tranekj？r J？rgensen, J.; Kj？r, A. Molecular Imaging with Small Animal PET/CT. Curr. Med. Imaging Rev. 2011, 7, 234–247, doi:10.2174/157340511796411221.
[8]
Daube-Witherspoon, M.E.; Muehllehner, G. Treatment of axial data in three-dimensional PET. J. Nucl. Med. 1987, 28, 1717–1724.
[9]
Qi, J.; Leahy, R.M. Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2000, 19, 493–506, doi:10.1109/42.870259.
[10]
Tohme, M.S.; Qi, J. Iterative image reconstruction for positron emission tomography based on a detector response function estimated from point source measurements. Phys. Med. Biol. 2009, 54, 3709–3725, doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/12/007.
[11]
Cheng, J.C.; Rahmim, A.; Blinder, S.; Camborde, M.L.; Raywood, K.; Sossi, V. A scatter-corrected list-mode reconstruction and a practical scatter/random approximation technique for dynamic PET imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52, 2089–2106, doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/8/004.
[12]
Ay, M.R.; Zaidi, H. Assessment of errors caused by X-ray scatter and use of contrast medium when using CT-based attenuation correction in PET. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2006, 33, 1301–1313, doi:10.1007/s00259-006-0086-6.
[13]
Wegmann, K.; Brix, G. Evaluation of a scatter correction technique for single photon transmission measurements in PET by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Nuklearmedizin 2000, 39, 67–71.
[14]
Zaidi, H. Scatter modelling and correction strategies in fully 3-D PET. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2001, 22, 1181–1184, doi:10.1097/00006231-200111000-00003.
[15]
Karp, J.S.; Muehllehner, G.; Qu, H.; Yan, X.H. Singles transmission in volume-imaging PET with a 137Cs source. Phys. Med. Biol. 1995, 40, 929–944, doi:10.1088/0031-9155/40/5/014.
[16]
Chow, P.L.; Stout, D.B.; Komisopoulou, E.; Chatziioannou, A.F. A method of image registration for small animal, multi-modality imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006, 51, 379–390, doi:10.1088/0031-9155/51/2/013.
[17]
Kinahan, P.E.; Townsend, D.W.; Beyer, T.; Sashin, D. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med. Phys. 1998, 25, 2046–2053, doi:10.1118/1.598392.
[18]
Levin, C.S.; Zaidi, H. Current trends in preclinical PET system design. PET Clin. 2007, 2, 125–160, doi:10.1016/j.cpet.2007.12.001.
