The OpenStreetMap (OSM) project is a prime example in the field of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI). Worldwide, several hundred thousand people are currently contributing information to the “free” geodatabase. However, the data contributions show a geographically heterogeneous pattern around the globe. Germany counts as one of the most active countries in OSM; thus, the German street network has undergone an extensive development in recent years. The question that remains is this: How does the street network perform in a relative comparison with a commercial dataset? By means of a variety of studies, we show that the difference between the OSM street network for car navigation in Germany and a comparable proprietary dataset was only 9% in June 2011. The results of our analysis regarding the entire street network showed that OSM even exceeds the information provided by the proprietary dataset by 27%. Further analyses show on what scale errors can be reckoned with in the topology of the street network, and the completeness of turn restrictions and street name information. In addition to the analyses conducted over the past few years, projections have additionally been made about the point in time by which the OSM dataset for Germany can be considered “complete” in relative comparison to a commercial dataset.
References
[1]
Anderson, P. What Is Web 2.0? Ideas, Technologies and Implications for Education.; JISC: Bristol, UK, 2007.
[2]
Diaz, L.; Granell, C.; Gould, M.; Huerta, J. Managing user-generated information in geospatial cyberinfrastructures. Future Gen. Comput. Syst. 2011, 27, 304–314, doi:10.1016/j.future.2010.09.002.
[3]
Coast, S. OpenStreetMap. Workshop on Volunteered Geographic Information. 2007. Available online: (accessed on 11 November 2011).
[4]
Nelson, A.; de Sherbinin, A.; Pozzi, F. Towards development of a high quality public domain global roads database. Data Sci. J. 2006, 5, 223–265, doi:10.2481/dsj.5.223.
[5]
Elwood, S. Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal 2008, 72, 173–183, doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9186-0.
[6]
Goodchild, M.F. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 2007, 69, 211–221, doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
[7]
Goodchild, M.F. Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of web 2.0. Int. J. Spat. Data Infrastruct. Res. 2007, 2, 24–32.
[8]
Chilton, S. Crowdsourcing Is Radically Changing the Geodata Landscape: Case Study of OpenStreetMap. In Proceedings of the UK 24th International Cartography Conference, Santiago, Chile, 15–21 November 2009.
[9]
Heipke, C. Crowdsourcing geospatial data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2010, 65, 550–557, doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.06.005.
[10]
Hudson-Smith, A.; Batty, M.; Crooks, A.; Milton, R. Mapping for the masses: Accessing web 2.0 through crowdsourcing. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2008, 27, 524–538.
O’Reilly, T. What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software; O’Reilly Media: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005.
[13]
Goodchild, M.F. Spatial Accuracy 2.0. In Proceeding of the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Shanghai, China, 25–27 June 2008.
[14]
Hudson-Smith, A.; Batty, M.; Milton, R.; Batty, M. NeoGeography and web 2.0: Concepts, tools and applications. J. Locat. Based Serv. 2009, 3, 118–145, doi:10.1080/17489720902950366.
[15]
Rana, S.; Joliveau, T. NeoGeography: An extension of mainstream geography for everyone made by everyone? J. Locat. Based Serv. 2009, 3, 75–81, doi:10.1080/17489720903146824.
[16]
Turner, J.A. Introduction to Neogeography; O’Reilly Media: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006.
[17]
Walsh, J. The beginning and end of neogeography. GEOconnexion Int. Mag. 2008, 7, 28–30.
[18]
Fischer, F. Collaborative mapping—How wikinomics is manifest in the geo-information economy. GEO Inf. 2008, 2, 28–31.
[19]
Sui, D.Z. The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie's new tattoo and the future of GIS. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2008, 32, 1–5, doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2007.12.001.
[20]
20. Fritz, S.; McCallum, I.; Schill, C.; Perger, C.; Grillmayer, R.; Achard, F.; Kraxner, F.; Obersteiner, M. Geo-Wiki.Org: The use of crowdsourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sens. 2009, 1, 345–354, doi:10.3390/rs1030345.
[21]
Mooney, P.; Corcoran, P. Using OSM for LBS—An Analysis of Changes to Attributes of Spatial Objects. In Advances in Location-Based Services; Gartner, G., Ortag, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010.
[22]
Neis, P.; Zipf, A. OpenRouteService.org is Three Times “Open”: Combining OpenSource, OpenLS and OpenStreetMap; GIS Research UK: Manchester, UK, 2008.
[23]
Over, M.; Schilling, A.; Neubauer, S.; Zipf, A. Generating web-based 3D city models from OpenStreetMap: The current situation in Germany. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2010, 34, 496–507, doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.05.001.
[24]
Nielsen, J. Participation Inequality: Encouraging More Users to Contribute, Alertbox. 2006. Available online: (accessed on 11 November 2011).
[25]
Ramm, F. Crowdsourcing Geodata. Society of Cartographers Summer School, Southampton. 2008. Available online: (accessed on 28 December 2011).
[26]
Ramm, F. Krautsourcing 2.0 Beta - The State of Germany. State of the Map, Amsterdam. 2009. Available online: (accessed on 28 December 2011).
[27]
Goodchild, M. NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise. J. Locat. Based Serv. 2009, 3, 82–96, doi:10.1080/17489720902950374.
[28]
Flanagin, A.J.; Metzger, M.J. The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 2008, 72, 137–148, doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9188-y.
[29]
Maué, P.; Schade, S. Quality of Geographic Information Patchworks. In Proceedings of AGILE, Girona, Spain, 5–8 May 2008.
[30]
Ather, A. A Quality Analysis of OpenStreetMap Data. M.E. Thesis, University College London, London, UK, May 2009.
[31]
Haklay, M. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environ. Plan. B 2010, 37, 682–703, doi:10.1068/b35097.
[32]
Zielstra, D.; Zipf, A. A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany. In Proceedings of 13th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Guimar？es, Portugal, 10–14 May 2010.
[33]
Ludwig, I.; Voss, A.; Krause-Traudes, M. Wie gut ist open street map? Zur methodik eines automatisierten objektbasierten vergleiches der strassennetze von OSM und NAVTEQ in Deutschland. GIS Sci. 2010, 4, 148–158.
[34]
Girres, J.F.; Touya, G. Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Trans. GIS 2010, 14, 435–459, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01203.x.
[35]
Zielstra, D.; Hochmair, H.H. Digital street data: Free versus proprietary. GIM Int. 2011, 25, 29–33.
[36]
Zielstra, D.; Hochmair, H.H. A comparative study of pedestrian accessibility to transit stations using free and proprietary network data. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2011, 2217, 145–152, doi:10.3141/2217-18.
[37]
Zielstra, D.; Hochmair, H. H. Comparison of Shortest Path Lengths for Pedestrian Routing in Street Networks Using Free and Proprietary Data. In Proceedings of Transportation Research Board - 91st Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 22–26 January 2012.
[38]
Haklay, M.; Ellul, C. Completeness in volunteered geographical information—the evolution of OpenStreetMap coverage in England (2008-2009). J. Spat. Inf. Sci.. submitted for publication .
[39]
Brassel, K.; Bucher, F.; Stephan, E.; Vckovski, A. Completeness. In Elements of Spatial Data Quality; Guptill, S.C., Morrison, J.L., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 1995; pp. 81–108.
[40]
Oort, P.A.J. Spatial data quality: From Description to Application. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Germany, January 2006.
[41]
Chen, H.; Walter, V. Quality Inspection and Quality Improvement of Large Spatial Datasets. In Proceedings of the GSDI 11 World Conference: Spatial Data Infrastructure Convergence: Building SDI Bridges to Address Global Challenges, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 15–19 June 2009.
[42]
Schmitz S.; Neis P.; Zipf, A. New Applications Based on Collaborative Geodata—the Case of Routing. In Proceedings of XXVIII INCA International Congress on Collaborative Mapping and Space Technology, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India, 4–6 November 2008.
[43]
Brando, C.; Bucher, B. Quality in User-Generated Spatial Content: A Matter of Specifications. In Proceedings of the 13th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Guimar？es, Portugal, 10–14 May 2010.
