It is vital to understand what kind of processes for learning that Geovisual Analytics creates, as certain activities and conditions are produced when employing Geovisual Anlytic tools in education. To understand learning processes created by Geovisual Analytics, first requires an understanding of the interactions between the technology, the workplace where the learning takes place, and learners’ specific knowledge formation. When studying these types of interaction it demands a most critical consideration from theoretical perspectives on research design and methods. This paper first discusses common, and then a more uncommon, theoretical approach used within the fields of learning with multimedia environments and Geovisual Analytics, the socio-cultural theoretical perspective. The paper next advocates this constructivist theoretical and empirical perspective when studying learning with multiple representational Geovisual Analytic tools. To illustrate, an outline of a study made within this theoretical tradition is offered. The study is conducted in an educational setting where the Open Statistics eXplorer platform is used. Discussion of our study results shows that the socio-cultural perspective has much to offer in terms of what kind of understanding can be reached in conducting this kind of studies. Therefore, we argue that empirical research to analyze how specific communities use various Geovisual Analytics to evaluate information is best positioned in a socio-cultural theoretical perspective.
References
[1]
Keim, D.A. Visual exploration of large data sets. Commun. ACM 2001, 44, 38–44.
[2]
Gustavsson, B. Vad ？r Kunskap? En Diskussion om Praktisk Och Teoretisk Kunskap; Statens skolverk: Stockholm, Sweden, 2002.
[3]
Kress, G.R. Multimodality a Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication; Routledge: London, UK, 2010.
[4]
Kress, G.R. Literacy in the New Media Age; Routledge: London, UK, 2003.
[5]
Keim, D.; Andrienko, G.; Fekete, J.-D.; G？rg, C.; Kohlhammer, J.; Melan？con, G. Visual Analytics: Definition,Process,and Challenges Information Visualization; Kerren, A., Stasko, J., Fekete, J., North, C., Eds., Eds.; Information Visualization; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008.
[6]
Andrienko, G.; Andrienko, N.; Dykes, J.; Fabrikant, S.I.; Wachowicz, M. Geovisualization of dynamics, movement and change: Key issues and developing approaches in visualization research. Inf. Vis. 2008, 7, 173–180, doi:10.1057/ivs.2008.23.
[7]
Tomaszewski, B. Producing geo-historical context from implicit sources: A geovisual analytics approach. Cartogr. J. 2008, 45, 165, doi:10.1179/000870408X311369.
[8]
Andrienko, G.; Andrienko, N.; Demsar, U.; Dransch, D.; Dykes, J.; Fabrikant, S.R.; Jern, M.; Kraak, M.H.; Schumann, H.; Tominski, C. Space, time and visual analytics. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2010, 24, 1453–1600, doi:10.1080/13658816.2010.519147.
[9]
Jern, M. Collaborative Educational Geoanalytics Applied to Large Statistics Temporal Data. In. In Proceedings of CSEDU 2010—2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Valencia, Spain, 7–10 April 2010.
[10]
Sundin, O.; Julien, H.; Limberg, L.; Rieh, S.Y. Credibility and authority of information in learning environments. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2008, 45, 1–5.
[11]
Alexandersson, M.; Limberg, L.; Lantz-Andersson, A.; Kylemark, M. Textflytt och S？kslump—Informationss？kning via Skolbibliotek; Myndigheten f？r skolutveckling: Stockholm, Sweden, 2007.
[12]
Eds.; Lantz-Andersson, A.; Alexandersson, M.; Limberg, L. To be Lost and to be a Loser Through the Web. Handbook of Research on Digital Information Technologies: Innovations, Methods, and Ethical Issues; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2008; pp. 249–263.
[13]
Jedeskog, G. "Maila mig sen!": L？rarintentioner och F？r？ndrade Gr？nser f？r Elevers Arbete; Link？ping University: Link？？ping, Sweden, 2001.
[14]
Jedeskog, G. Ny i Klassen - F？rh？llandet Mellan L？rarroll och Datoranv？ndning Beskrivet i Internationell Forskning; Ekelunds f？rlag: Solna, Sweden, 2000.
[15]
de Jong, T.; Joolingen, W.R. Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Rev. Educ. Res. 1998, 68, 179–201.
[16]
Moreno, R.; Mayer, R.E. A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. J. Educ. Psychol. 2000, 92, 117–125, doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.117.
[17]
Ainsworth, S.; Bibby, P.; Wood, D. Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. J. Learn. Sci. 2002, 11, 25–61, doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_2.
[18]
Ainsworth, S. DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learn. Instr. 2006, 16, 183–198, doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.
[19]
Ainsworth, S. How Should We Evaluate Multimedia Learning Environments? In Understanding Multimedia Documents; Rouet, J., Lowe, R., Schnotz, W., Eds., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
[20]
？str？m, T.; Jern, M.; Lundblad, P.; Ho, Q. A web-enabled visualization toolkit for geovisual analytics visualization and data analysis. Proc. SPIE 2011, 7868, doi:10.1117/12.872250.
[21]
Sweller, J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cogn. Sci. 1988, 12, 257–285, doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
Mayer, R.E.; Moreno, R. A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working. J. Educ. Psychol. 1998, 90, 312–320, doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312.
[24]
Mayer, R.E.; Moreno, R. Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learn. Instr. 2002, 12, 107–119, doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4.
[25]
Moreno, R.; Mayer, R.E. Designing Multimedia Presentations with Animation: What Does the Research Say? In Proceedings of IEEE Multimedia Systems 1999, Florence, Italy, 7–11 June 1999.
[26]
Goldman, S. Learning in complex domains: When and why do multiple representations help? Learn. Instr. 2003, 13, 239–244, doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00023-3.
[27]
Vygotskij, L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes; Cole, M., Ed., Eds.; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1978.
[28]
Vygotsky, L. Thought and language. Ann. Dyslexia 1964, 14, 97–98.
[29]
Wertsch, J.V. Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1985.
[30]
Vygotskij, L.S. Thought and Language; Kozulin, A., Ed., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986.
[31]
Wertsch, J.V. Mind as Action; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998.
[32]
Driscoll, M.P. Psychology of Learning for Instruction: Learning and Instructional Technology; Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 1993.
[33]
Gallimore, R.; Tharp, R.G. Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching,Learning,and Schooling in Social Context; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988.
[34]
Prizant, B.M.; Crais, E.R.; Wetherby, A.M.; Kublin, K.S. Prelinguistic Dynamic Assessment: A Transactional Perspective. In Transitions in Prelinguistic Communication; Wetherby, A.M., Warren, S.F., Reichle, J., Eds., Eds.; Paul H. Brookes: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1989; pp. 285–289.
[35]
S？lj？, R. L？rande i Praktiken - ett Sociokulturellt Perspektiv; Norstedt: Stockholm, Sweden, 2010.
[36]
Gibson, J.J. V？ra Sinnen som Perceptuella System; Beckman: Stockholm, Sweden, 1969.
[37]
Jewitt, C. Technology,Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2005.
[38]
Kress, G.R.; Selander, S. Design f？r L？rande: Ett Multimodalt Perspektiv; Norstedt: Stockholm, Sweden, 2010.
[39]
Berger, A.A. Media and Communication Research Methods: An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2011.
[40]
Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1986.
[41]
Moreno, R. Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instr. Sci. 2004, 32, 99–113, doi:10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021811.66966.1d.
[42]
Van Leeuwen, T. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
[43]
Jern, M.; Stenliden, L. Educating Official Statistics Using Geovisual Analytics Storytelling Methods. In. In Proceedings INTED2010;; International Association of Technology,Education and Development (IATED).
[44]
Rystedt, H. ,S？lj？,R.,Eds. Kunskap och M？nniskans redskap: Teknik och L？rande; Studentlitteratur: Stockholm, Sweden, 2008.
[45]
Eds.; Luff, P.; Heath, C. Technology-in-Action; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA; Cambridge, UK, 2000.
[46]
Gil, A.; Bruner, J.S. The Relevance of Education; Norton: New York, NY, USA, 1971.
[47]
Talja, S. Jean Lave’s Practice Theory.. In Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines; Eds., Buschman, J.E., Given, L.M., Leckie, G.J., Eds.; Libraries Unlimited: Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 2010.
