In his Incomplete Nature, Deacon extends a thermodynamic concept of energy to yield a description of complex processes in which absence plays a critical role in their emergence and evolution. Starting from a quantum-mechanical picture of energy as an energy-matter duality, the critical role of potential as well as actual properties of processes is also described in the new extension of logic to real phenomena, Logic in Reality (LIR), which I have proposed. Deacon shows how an interactive operation of both Shannon entropy and Boltzmann entropy must be taken into account in information. Here, I demonstrate the complementarity of our two approaches to what is not, or not fully, present for an understanding of the dynamics of complex phenomena, especially, of intentionality, information and meaning. Deacon shows that the hallmark of information is its absent content, and LIR shows that presence (actuality) and absence (potentiality) in such processes are related dynamically. Deacon’s approach and LIR ground and extend Logan’s concepts of biotic information and the relativity of information vs. meaning. Their conjunction constitutes a new conceptual structure for exploring the relationship of information to materiality, that is, to the matter-energy that constitutes it as its carrier and/or substrate.
References
[1]
Marijuan, P.C. Information and life: Towards a biological understanding of informational phenomena. Triple-C 2004, 2, 6–19.
[2]
Hofkirchner, W. Twenty Questions about a Unified Theory of Information; Emergent Publications: Litchfield Park, AZ, USA, 2010.
[3]
Burgin, M. Theory of Information: Fundamentality, Diversity and Unification; World Scientific: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
[4]
Luhn, G. The Causal-compositional concept of information Part I. Elementary theory: From decompositional physics to compositional information. Information 2012, 3, 151–174, doi:10.3390/info3010151.
[5]
Deacon, T.W. What is missing from theories of information? In Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics; Davies, P., Gregersen, N.H., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010.
[6]
Deacon, T.W. Incomplete Nature: How Mind Evolved from Matter; W.W. Norton & Co.: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
[7]
Wu, K.; Brenner, J.E. The informational stance. Logic and Philosophy. Log. Log. Philos. 2013. in press.
[8]
Brenner, J.E. Logic in Reality; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008.
[9]
Machery, E. Why I stopped worrying about the definition of life… and why you should as well. Synthese 2012, 185, 145–164, doi:10.1007/s11229-011-9880-1.
[10]
Ulanowicz, R.E. A Third Window: Natural Life beyond Newton and Darwin; Templeton Foundation Press: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2009.
Brenner, J.E. Levels of abstraction. Levels of reality. Philos. Eng. Technol. 2012, 8, 201–222, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4292-5_11.
[13]
Brier, S. Cybersemiotics: Why Information is not Enough; University of Toronto Press: Toronto, Canada, 2008; p. 427.
[14]
Floridi, L. The logic of being informed. Log. Anal. 2006, 49, 433–460.
[15]
Zhong, X.-Y. On information science—An introduction to principles of information science. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science, Beijing, China, 21–24 August 2010.
[16]
Collier, J. Intrinsic information. In Information, Language, Cognition; Hanson, P., Ed.; University of British Columbia Press: Vancouver, Canada, 1990.
[17]
Brenner, J.E.; Burgin, M. Information as a natural and social operator. Inf. Theor. Appl. 2011, 18, 33–49.
[18]
Lupasco, S. Le Principe d’antagonisme et La Logique de L’énergie; Le Rocher: Paris, France, 1987.
[19]
Aerts, D.; D’Hondt, E.; Gabora, L. Why the logical disjunction in quantum logic is not classical. Found. Phys. 2000, 30, 1473–1480, doi:10.1023/A:1026457918361.
[20]
Lupasco, S. Qu’est-ce qu’une Structure?; Christian Bourgois: Paris, France, 1967.
[21]
Varela, F.J. The creative circle: Sketches on the natural history of circularity. In The Invented Reality; Watzlavick, P., Ed.; Norton Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 1984.
[22]
Hofkirchner, W. How to achieve a unified theory of Information. Triple-C 2009, 7, 357–358.
[23]
Capurro, R. Towards an ontological foundation of information ethics. Ethics Inf. Technol. 2006, 8, 175–186, doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9108-0.
[24]
Brenner, J.E. Information in reality: Logic and metaphysics. Triple-C 2011, 9, 332–341.
Logan, R.K. What is information?: Why is it relativistic and what is its relationship to materiality, meaning and organization? Information 2012, 3, 68–91, doi:10.3390/info3010068.
[27]
Ulanowicz, R.E. Towards quantifying a wider reality: Shannon exonerata. Information 2011, 2, 624–634, doi:10.3390/info2040624.
[28]
Brenner, J.E. On representation in information theory. Information 2011, 2, 560–578, doi:10.3390/info2030560.
[29]
Lupasco, S. L’énergie et la Matière Vivante; Le Rocher: Monaco, 1987.
[30]
Varela, F.; Shear, J. First Person accounts: Why, what and how. In The View from Within; Varela, F., Shear, J., Eds.; Imprint Academic: Thorverton, UK, 1999; pp. 1–14.
[31]
Brier, S. Cybersemiotics: An evolutionary world view going beyond entropy and information into the question of meaning. Entropy , 2010 12, 1902–1920.
[32]
Heidegger, M. Being and Time; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987.
[33]
Nicolescu, B. Nous, la Particule et le Monde; Editions du Rocher: Paris, France, 2002.
[34]
Capurro, R. Angeletics—A Message Theory. In Messages and Messengers: Angeletics as an Approach to the Phenomenology of Communication; Capurro, R., Holgate, J., Eds.; Wilhelm Fink: Munich, Germany, 2011.
