全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Micromachines  2012 

Quantitative Studies on PDMS-PDMS Interface Bonding with Piranha Solution and its Swelling Effect

DOI: 10.3390/mi3020427

Keywords: polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), swelling, bonding effects, piranha solution

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In this paper, a low-cost yet effective method of irreversible bonding between two elastomeric polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) interfaces using Piranha solution is investigated. Piranha solutions at a weight ratio of 3:1 using different acids and hydrogen peroxide were attempted. The average tensile strengths of the device bonded with concentrated sulfuric acid-based piranha solution and nitric acid-based piranha solution were found to be 200 ± 20 kPa and 100 ± 15 kPa respectively. A PDMS surface treated with Piranha Solution demonstrated an increase in hydrophilicity. In addition, relatively straightforward swelling studies of PDMS using a weight loss method with common organic solvents were also investigated. Experimental results show that hexane, toluene, ethyl acetate, n-propyl alcohol and acetone swell PDMS significantly over a duration of up to 1 h and above; PDMS samples reached a steady state of swelling only after 5 min of immersion in other solvents. This will enable researchers to develop devices for the future according to the interaction between the material and the solvents in contact.

References

[1]  Whitesides, G.M. The origin and the future of microfluidics. Nature 2006, 442, 368–373.
[2]  Shilpiekandula, V.; Burns, D.J.; El Rifai, K.; Youcef-Toumi, K.; Li, S.; Reading, I.; Soon, F.Y. Metrology of microfluidic devices: A review. ICOMM 2006, 49, 1–6.
[3]  Neethirajan, S.; Kobayashi, I.; Nakajima, M.; Wu, D.; Nandagopal, S. Microfluidics for food, agriculture and biosystems industries. Lab Chip 2011, 11, 1574–1586.
[4]  Gorkin, R.; Park, J.; Siegrist, J.; Amasia, M.; Lee, B.S.; Park, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Madou, M.; Cho, Y. Centrifugal microfluidics for biomedical applications. Lab Chip 2010, 10, 1758–1773.
[5]  Duffy, D.C.; Olivier, J.C.M.; Schueller, J.A.; Whitesides, G.M. Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(demethylsiloxane). Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 4974–4984.
[6]  Duffy, D.C.; Schueller, J.A.; Brittain, S.T.; Whitesides, G.M. Rapid prototyping of microfluidic switches in poly(dimethylsiloxane) and their actuation by electro-osmotic flow. J. Micromech. Microeng. 1999, 9, 211–217.
[7]  Kim, J.; Chaudhury, M.K. Corona-Discharge-Induced Hydrophobicity Loss and Recovery of Silicones. In Proceedings of Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, Austin, TX, USA, 17-20 October 1999; 2, pp. 703–706.
[8]  Eddings, M.A.; Johnson, M.A.; Gale, B.K. Determining the optimal PDMS-PDMS bonding technique for microfluidic devices. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2008, 18, 067001.
[9]  Lee, N.Y.; Chung, B.H. Novel poly(dimethyl siloxane) bonding strategy via room temperature “Chemical gluing”. Langmuir 2008, 25, 3861–3866.
[10]  McDonald, J.C.; Duffy, D.C.; Anderson, J.R.; Chiu, D.T.; Wu, H.K.; Schueller, O.J.A.; Whitesides, G.M. Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 27–40.
[11]  Dangla, R.; Gallaire, F.; Baround, C.N. Microchannel deformations due to solvent-induced PDMS swelling. Lab Chip 2010, 10, 2972–2978.
[12]  Damon, Diemente. The hydronium ion: How do we know? J. Chem. Educ. 1991, 68, 568–269, doi:10.1021/ed068p568.
[13]  Chabinye, M.L.; Chiu, D.T.; Mcdonald, J.C.; Strook, A.D.; Christian, J.F.; Karger, A.F.; Whitesides, G.M. An integrated fluorescence detection system in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for microfluidic applications. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 4491–4498.
[14]  Mcdonald, J.C.; Duffy, D.C.; Anderson, J.R.; Chiu, D.T.; Wu, H.; Schueller, O.J.A.; Whitesides, G.M. Fabrication of microfluidic systems in polydimethyl siloxane. Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 27–40.
[15]  Nguyen, N.T.; Werely, S.T. Fundamentals and Applications of Microfluidics; Artech House: Norwood, MA, USA, 2002; pp. 247–292.
[16]  Hillborg, H.; Gedde, U.W. Hydrophobicity changes in silicone rubbers. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 1999, 5, 701–717.
[17]  Lee, J.N.; Park, C.; Whitesides, G.M. Solvent compatibility of poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based microfluidic devices. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 6544–6554.
[18]  Chaudhury, M.K.; Whitesides, G.M. Direct measurement of interfacial interaction between semispherical lenses and flat sheets of poly(dimethylsiloxane) and their chemical derivatives. Langmuir 1991, 7, 1013–1025.
[19]  Chaudhury, M.K.; Whitesides, G.M. Correlation between free energy and surface constitution. Science 1991, 255, 1230–1232.
[20]  Morra, M.; Occhiello, E.; Marola, R.; Garbassi, F.; Humphrey, P.; Johnson, D. The aging of oxygen plasma-treated polydimethylsiloxane surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1990, 137, 11–24.
[21]  Buckley, D.J.; Berger, M.; Poller, D. The swelling of polymer systems in solvents. I. Method for obtaining complete swelling-time curves. J. Polym. Sci. 1962, 56, 163–174, doi:10.1002/pol.1962.1205616314.
[22]  Kim, B.Y.; Hong, L.Y.; Chung, Y.M.; Kim, D.P. Solvent resistant PDMS microfluidic devices with hybrid inorganic/organic polymer coatings. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 3796–3803.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413