Conflict or Concert? Extending the Simmelian Triad to Account for Positive Third Party Presence in Face-to-Face Interviews with People Living with Parkinson’s Disease
A number of sociologists and other researchers have focused on the role of third parties since Simmel’s seminal conceptualization of the social organization of the triad. However, less attention has been given to third party presence in qualitative interviews, despite the fact that third party participation in interviews with people with chronic illness and/or disability occurs frequently. Here too it is assumed that third party presence promotes conflict, ignoring the role of third parties as facilitators who enable informants to articulate their perspectives. Therefore, I focus on Simmel’s concept of the triad, concluding that the role of facilitator must be added to the types he describes.
References
[1]
Wolff, K.H. The Sociology of Georg Simmel; K.H. Wolff R., Bendix, Ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1950.
[2]
Burns, L.R.; Nash, D.B.; Wholey, D.R. The Evolving Role of Third Parties in the Hospital-Physician Relationship. Am. J. Med. Q. 2007, 22, 402–409, doi:10.1177/1062860607307991.
[3]
Caplow, T. Further Development of a Theory of Coalitions in the Triad. Am. J. Sociol. 1959, 64, 488–493.
[4]
Caplow, T. Two against One: Coalitions in Triads; Prentice-Hall: Englewood, NJ, USA, 1968.
[5]
Choi, T.Y.; Wu, Z.H. Taking the Leap from Dyads to Triads: Buyer-Supplier Relationships in Supply Networks. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2009, 15, 263–266, doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2009.08.003.
[6]
Clayman, S.E. Disagreements and Third Parties: Dilemmas of Neutralism in Panel News Interviews. J. Pragmat. 2002, 34, 1385–1401, doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00070-X.
[7]
Khurana, R. Market Triads: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Market. Int. J. Theor. Soc. Behav. 2002, 32, 239–262, doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00185.
[8]
Lowe, R.D.; Levine, M.; Best, R.M.; Heim, D. Bystander Reaction to Women Fighting: Developing a Theory of Intervention. J. Interpers. Violence 2012, 27, 1802–1826, doi:10.1177/0886260511430393.
[9]
Madhavan, R.; Gnyawali, D.R.; He, J. Two’s Company, Three’s a Crowd? Triads in Cooperative-Competitive Networks. Acad. Manag. J. 2004, 47, 918–927, doi:10.2307/20159631.
[10]
Mills, T.M. Some Hypotheses on Small Groups from Simmel. Am. J. Sociol. 1958, 63, 642–650.
[11]
Mills, T.M. The Coalition Pattern in Three Person Groups. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1954, 19, 657–667, doi:10.2307/2087912.
[12]
Mills, T.M. Power Relations in Three-Person Groups. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1953, 18, 351–357, doi:10.2307/2087546.
[13]
Raymond, G.A. Democracies, Disputes, and Third-Party Intermediaries. J. Conflict. Resolut. 1994, 38, 24–42, doi:10.1177/0022002794038001002.
[14]
Reagans, R. Differences in Social Difference: Examining Third Party Effects on Relational Stability. Soc. Network 1998, 20, 143–157, doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(97)00011-7.
[15]
Van der Iest, H.; Dijkstra, J.; Stokman, F.N. Not 'Just the Two of Us': Third Party Externalities of Social Dilemmas. Ration Soc. 2011, 23, 347, doi:10.1177/1043463111412716.
[16]
Volkema, R.J.; Farquhar, K.; Bergmann, T.J. Third-Party Sensemaking in Interpersonal Conflicts at Work: A Theoretical Framework. Hum. Relat. 1996, 49, 1437–1454, doi:10.1177/001872679604901104.
[17]
Vuchinich, S.; Emery, R.E.; Cassidy, J. Family Members as Third Parties in Dyadic Family Conflict: Strategies, Alliances, and Outcomes. Child Dev. 1988, 59, 1293–1302, doi:10.2307/1130492.
[18]
Prus, R. Beyond the Power Mystique: Power as Intersubjective Accomplishment; State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA, 1999.
[19]
Greatbatch, D.; Dingwall, R. Argumentative Talk in Divorce Mediation Sessions. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1997, 62, 151–170, doi:10.2307/2657457.
[20]
Faust, K. Triadic Configurations in Limited Choice Sociometric Networks: Empirical and Theoretical Results. Soc. Network 2008, 30, 273–282, doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.04.002.
[21]
Labianca, G.; Brass, D.J.; Gray, B. Social Networks and Perceptions of Intergroup Conflict: The Role of Negative Relationships and Third Parties. Acad. Manag. J. 1998, 41, 55–67, doi:10.2307/256897.
[22]
Latour, B. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society; Open University Press: Milton Keynes, UK, 1987.
[23]
Aquilino, W.S. Effects of Spouse Presence During the Interview on Survey Responses Concerning Marriage. Publ. Opin. Q. 1993, 57, 358–376, doi:10.1086/269381.
[24]
Boeije, H.R. And Then There Were Three: Self-presentational Styles and the Presence of a Third Person in the Interview. Field Meth. 2004, 16, 3–22, doi:10.1177/1525822X03259228.
[25]
Corti, L.; Clissold, K.M. Response Contamination by Third Parties in a Household Interview Survey; Working Papers of the ESRC Research Centre on Micro-social Change, Paper Number13; University of Essex: Essex, UK, 1992.
[26]
Pollner, M.; Adams, R.E. The Interpersonal Context of Mental Health Interviews. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1994, 35, 283–290, doi:10.2307/2137281.
[27]
Smith, T.W. The Impact of the Presence of Others on a Respondent’s Answers to Questions. Int. J. Publ. Opin. Res. 1997, 9, 33–47, doi:10.1093/ijpor/9.1.33.
[28]
Zipp, J.F.; Toth, J. She Said, He Said, They Said: The Impact of Spousal Presence in Survey Research. Public Opin. Q. 2022, 66, 177–208, doi:10.1086/340028.
[29]
Low, J. Communication Problems between Researchers and Informants with Speech Difficulties: Methodological and Analytic Issues. Field Meth. 2006, 18, 153–171, doi:10.1177/1525822X05285843.
[30]
Lesser, R.; Whitworth, A. 1999. Communication in Parkinson’s Disease with Cognitive Impairment: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Medium? In Parkinson’s Disease: Studies in Psychological and Social Care; Percival, R., Hobson, P., Eds.; BPS Books: Leicester, UK, 1999; pp. 236–245.
[31]
Booth, T.; Booth, W. The Use of Depth Interviewing with Vulnerable Subjects: Lessons from a Research Study of Parents with Learning Difficulties. Soc. Sci. Med. 1994, 39, 415–424, doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90139-2.
[32]
Low, J. Lay Perspectives on the Efficacy of Alternative and Complementary Therapies: The Experiences of People Living with Parkinson’s Disease; Division of Health Studies, Faculty of Health and Community Studies, De Montfort University: Leicester, UK, 2001.
[33]
Yarrow, S. Members’ 1998 Survey of the Parkinson’s Disease Society of the United Kingdom. In Parkinson’s Disease: Studies in Psychological and Social Care; Percival, R., Hobson, P., Eds.; BPS Books: Leicester, UK, 1999; pp. 79–92.
[34]
Thomas, K.J.; Nicholl, J.P.; Coleman, P. Use and Expenditure on Complementary Medicine in England: A Population Based Survey. Compl. Ther. Med. 2000, 9, 2–11.
[35]
Corbin, J.M.; Strauss, A.L. Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria. Q. Sociol. 1990, 13, 3–21, doi:10.1007/BF00988593.
[36]
Trow, M. Comment on Participant Observation and Interviewing: A Comparison. In Qualitative Methodology: Firsthand Involvement with the Social World; Filstead, W.J., Ed.; Markham Publishing Company: Chicago, IL, USA, 1970; pp. 143–149.
[37]
Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods.; Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1989.
[38]
Williams, M. Interpretivism and Generalisation. Sociology 2000, 34, 209–224.
[39]
Blumer, H. Symbolic Interactionsim: Perspective and Method; Prentice Hall: New Jersey, NY, USA, 1969.
[40]
Prus, R. Subcultural Mosaics and Intersubjective Realities; State of New York University Press: Albany, NY, USA, 1997.
[41]
Wolff, K.H. The Sociology of Georg Simmel; Wolff, K.H., Bendix, R., Eds.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1950; p. 135.
[42]
Ibid, p.145
[43]
Ibid, p.154
[44]
Ibid, p.162
[45]
Ibid, pp. 135-136
[46]
Prus, R. Beyond the Power Mystique: Power as Intersubjective Accomplishment; State University of New York Press: Albany, New York, NY, USA, 1999; p. 153.
[47]
Atkinson, P. Narrative turn or blind alley? Qual. Health Res. 1997, 7, 325–344, doi:10.1177/104973239700700302.
[48]
Atkinson, P.; Coffey, A. Revisiting the relationship between participant observation and interviewing. In Postmodern Interviewing; Gubrium, J.F., Holstein, J.A., Eds.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2003.
[49]
Charmaz, K. Stories and Silences: Disclosures and Self in Chronic Illness. Qual. Inq. 2002, 83, 302–328, doi:10.1177/107780040200800307.
[50]
Clifford, J.; Marcus, E.G. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1986.
[51]
Silverman, D. The Quality of Qualitative Health Research: The Open-Ended Interview and its Alternative. Soc. Sci. Health 1998, 4, 104–118.
[52]
Villanueva, C.M.; Buriel, R. Speaking on Behalf of Others: A Qualitative Study of the Perceptions and Feelings of Adolescent Latina. J. Soc. Issues 2010, 66, 197–210, doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01640.x.
