|
Ratio of involved/uninvolved immunoglobulin quantification by Hevylite? assay: clinical and prognostic impact in multiple myelomaKeywords: Multiple myeloma, Prognosis, Serum immunoglobulin, Heavy/light chain measurements, HLCR Abstract: HevyLite? assays were used in sera from 130 healthy individuals (HI) and 103 MM patients, at time of diagnosis. In patients, the level of paraprotein was IgG in 78 (52 IgG-kappa, 26 IgG-lambda) and IgΑ in 25 (13 IgΑ-kappa, 12 IgΑ-lambda). Durie-Salmon and International Staging System stages were evenly distributed. Symptomatic patients (n = 77) received treatment while asymptomatic ones (n = 26) were followed. Patients' median follow-up was at 32.6 months. HLCR was calculated with the involved Ig (either G or A) as numerator.In HI, median IgG-kappa was 6.85, IgG-lambda 3.81, IgA-kappa 1.19 and IgA-lambda 0.98 g/L. The corresponding median involving HLC values in MM patients were 25.8, 23.45, 28.9 and 36.4 g/L. HLC-IgG related to anemia, high serum free light chain ratio and extensive bone marrow infiltration, while high HLCR correlated with the same plus increased β2-microglobulin. In addition, increased HLCR and the presence of immunoparesis correlated with time to treatment. Patients with high HLCR had a significantly shorter survival (p = 0.022); HLCR retained its prognostic value in multivariate analysis.HLC and HLCR quantify the precise amount of the involved immunoglobulin more accurately than other methods; moreover, they carry prognostic information regarding survival in MM patients.Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by bone marrow (BM) plasma cell infiltration and the presence of serum/urine monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig). Disease manifestations and behavior vary widely, while survival ranges from a few months to more than a decade.Serum monoclonal Ig quantification is part of MM diagnostic criteria, and one of Durie and Salmon (DS) staging system's risk factors [1]. It is also used for monitoring response and relapse. However, MM aggressiveness is not related to the amount of Ig secretion, and newer staging systems did not retain Ig quantity as a risk parameter [2].The poor utility of IgG and IgA measurements may be related to the following:1) Changes
|