The infancy literature situates the perceptual narrowing of speech sounds at around 10 months of age, but little is known about the mechanisms that influence individual differences in this developmental milestone. We hypothesized that such differences might in part be explained by characteristics of mother-child interaction. Infant sensitivity to syllables from their native tongue was compared longitudinally to sensitivity to non-native phonemes, at 6 months and again at 10 months. We replicated previous findings that at the group level, both 6- and 10- month-olds were able to discriminate contrasts in their native language, but only 6-month-olds succeeded in discriminating contrasts in the non-native language. However, when discrimination was assessed for separate groups on the basis of mother-child interaction—a ‘high contingency group’ and a ‘moderate contingency’ group—the vast majority of infants in both groups showed the expected developmental pattern by 10 months, but only infants in the ‘high contingency’ group showed early specialization for their native phonemes by failing to discriminate non-native contrasts at 6-months. The findings suggest that the quality of mother-child interaction is one of the exogenous factors influencing the timing of infant specialization for speech processing.
References
[1]
Mehler, J.; Lambertz, G.; Jusczyk, P.; Amiel-Tison, C. Discrimination of the mother tongue by newborn infants. CR Acad Sci. III 1986, 303, 637–640.
[2]
Karmiloff-Smith, A. Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science; MIT Press/Bradford Books: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995.
[3]
Bates, E. Plasticity, Localization and language development. In The Changing Nervous System: Neurobehavioral Consequences of Early Brain Disorders; Broman, S., Fletcher, J.M., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 214–253.
[4]
van der Lely, H.K. Domain-specific cognitive systems: Insight from Grammatical-SLI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9, 53–59, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.002.
[5]
Jusczyk, P.W.; Aslin, R.N. Infants’ detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognit. Psychol. 1995, 29, 1–23, doi:10.1006/cogp.1995.1010.
[6]
Jusczyk, P.W.; Luce, P.A.; Charles-Luce, J. Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. J. Mem. Lang. 1994, 33, 630–645, doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1030.
[7]
Mehler, J.; Christophe, A. Language in the infant’s mind. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1994, 346, 13–20, doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0123.
[8]
Best, C.T.; McRoberts, G.W.; LaFleur, R.; Silver-Isenstadt, J. Divergent developmental patterns for infants’ perception of two nonnative consonant contrasts. Infant Behav. Dev. 1995, 18, 339–350, doi:10.1016/0163-6383(95)90022-5.
[9]
Kuhl, P.K. Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, Monkeys do not. Percept. Psychophys. 1991, 50, 93–107, doi:10.3758/BF03212211.
[10]
Werker, J.F.; Tees, R.C. Influences on infant speech processing: Toward a new synthesis. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1999, 50, 509–535, doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.509.
[11]
Iverson, P.; Kuhl, P.K.; Akahane-Yamada, R.; Diesch, E.; Tohkura, Y.; Kettermann, A.; Siebert, C. A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition 2003, 87, 47–57, doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00198-1.
[12]
Werker, J.F.; Tees, R.C. Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Dev. Psychobiol. 2005, 46, 233–251, doi:10.1002/dev.20060.
[13]
Saffran, J.R. Words in a sea of sounds: the output of infant statistical learning. Cognition 2001, 81, 149–169, doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00132-9.
[14]
Anderson, J.L.; Morgan, J.L.; White, K.S. A statistical basis for speech sound discrimination. Lang. Speech 2003, 46, 155–182.
Maye, J.; Werker, J.F.; Gerken, L. Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 2002, 82, B101–B111, doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00157-3.
[17]
Ventureyra, V.; Pallier, C.; Yoo, H.Y. The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans. J. Neurolinguist. 2004, 17, 79–91, doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(03)00053-8.
[18]
Oh, J.S.; Jun, S.-A.; Knightly, L.M.; Au, T.K. Holding on to Childhood Language Memory. Cognition 2003, 86, B53–B64, doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00175-0.
[19]
Kuhl, P.K.; Tsao, F.M.; Liu, H.M. Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 9096–9101.
[20]
Goldstein, M.H.; Schwade, J.A. Social feedback to infants’ babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19, 515–522, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02117.x.
[21]
Bosch, L.; Sebastian-Galles, N. Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Lang. Speech. 2003, 46, 217–243, doi:10.1177/00238309030460020801.
[22]
Crittenden, P.M. CARE-Index: Coding Manual; Family Relations Inst.: Miami, FL, USA, 2006.
[23]
Leadbeater, B.J.; Bishop, S.J.; Raver, C.C. Quality of mother-toddler interaction, maternal depressive symptoms, and behavior problems of adolescent mothers. Dev. Psychol. 1996, 32, 280–288, doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.280.
[24]
Ward, M.J.; Carlson, E.A. The predictive validity of the adult attachment interview for adolescent mothers. Child. Dev. 1995, 66, 69–79, doi:10.2307/1131191.
[25]
Jusczyk, P.W. Some critical developments in acquiring native language sound organization during the first year. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 2002, 189, 11–15.
Tsao, F.M.; Liu, H.M.; Kuhl, P.K. Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: A longitudinal study. Child. Dev. 2004, 75, 1067–1084.
[28]
Molfese, D.L.; Molfese, V.J.; Key, A.F.; Kelly, S.D. Influence of environment on speech-sound discrimination: Findings from a longitudinal study. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2003, 24, 541–558.
[29]
Fodor, J.A. Modularity of Mind; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1983.
[30]
Hauser, M.D.; Chomsky, N.; Fitch, W.T. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 2002, 298, 1569–1579, doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569.
[31]
Elman, J.L.; Bates, E.; Johnson, M.H.; Karmiloff-Smith, A.; Parisi, D.; Plunkett, K. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996.
[32]
Kuhl, P.K.; Coffey-Corina, S.; Padden, D.; Dawson, G. Links between social and linguistic processing of speech in preschool children with autism: Behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Developmental. Sci. 2005, 8, F1–F12, doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00384.x.
