全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Diversity  2013 

High Genetic Diversity in Geographically Remote Populations of Endemic and Widespread Coral Reef Angelfishes (genus: Centropyge)

DOI: 10.3390/d5010039

Keywords: extinction risk, haplotype diversity, nucleotide diversity, Pomacanthidae, Christmas Island, Cocos (Keeling) Islands

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In the terrestrial environment, endemic species and isolated populations of widespread species have the highest rates of extinction partly due to their low genetic diversity. To determine if this pattern holds in the marine environment, we examined genetic diversity in endemic coral reef angelfishes and isolated populations of widespread species. Specifically, this study tested the prediction that angelfish (genus: Centropyge) populations at Christmas and Cocos Islands have low genetic diversity. Analyses of a 436 base pair fragment of the mtDNA control region revealed that the endemic C. joculator exhibited high haplotype ( h > 0.98 at both locations) and nucleotide (Christmas p% = 3.63, Cocos p% = 9.99) diversity. Similarly, isolated populations of widespread angelfishes ( C.?bispinosa and C. flavicauda) had high haplotype ( h > 0.98) and nucleotide (p% = 2.81 and p% = 5.78%, respectively) diversity. Therefore, in contrast to terrestrial patterns, endemic and isolated populations of widespread angelfishes do not have low genetic diversity, rather their haplotype and nucleotide diversities were among the highest reported for marine fishes. High genetic diversity should reduce extinction risk in these species as it could provide the evolutionary potential to adapt to the rapidly changing environmental conditions forecast for coral reefs.

References

[1]  Frankham, R. Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity 1997, 78, 311–327.
[2]  Frankham, R. Inbreeding and extinction: Island populations. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12, 665–675, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96456.x.
[3]  Whittaker, R.J. Island Biogeography: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998.
[4]  Pimm, S.L. The Balance of Nature: Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1991.
[5]  Gaston, K.J. Rarity; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1994.
[6]  Frankham, R.; Ballou, J.D.; Briscoe, D.A. Introduction to Conservation Genetics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002.
[7]  McNeely, J.A.; Miller, K.R.; Reid, W.V.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Werner, T.B. Conserving the World's Biological Diversity; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 1990.
[8]  Gaston, K.J.; Blackburn, T.M.; Lawton, J.H. Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: An appraisal of mechanisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 1997, 66, 579–601, doi:10.2307/5951.
[9]  Frankham, R. Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv. Biol. 1996, 10, 1500–1508.
[10]  Diamond, J. “Normal” extinctions of isolated populations. In Extinctions; Nitecki, M.H., Ed.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1984; pp. 191–246.
[11]  Randall, J.E. Zoogeography of shore fishes of the Indo-Pacific region. Zool. Stud. 1998, 37, 227–268.
[12]  Robertson, D.R. Population maintenance among tropical reef fishes: Inferences from small-island endemics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 5667–5670, doi:10.1073/pnas.091367798.
[13]  Hughes, T.P.; Bellwood, D.R.; Connolly, S.R. Biodiversity hotspots, centres of endemicity, and the conservation of coral reefs. Ecol. Lett. 2002, 5, 775–784, doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00383.x.
[14]  Jones, G.P.; Caley, M.J.; Munday, P.L. Rarity in coral reef fish communities. In Coral Reef Fishes: Dynamics and Diversity in a Complex Ecosystem; Sale, P.F., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2002; pp. 81–101.
[15]  Roberts, C.M.; Hawkins, J.P. Extinction risk in the sea. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14, 241–246, doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01584-5.
[16]  Dulvy, N.K.; Sadovy, Y.; Reynolds, J.D. Extinction vulnerability in marine populations. Fish Fish. 2003, 4, 25–64, doi:10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00105.x.
[17]  Bellwood, D.R.; Hughes, T.P.; Folke, C.; Nystr?m, M. Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 2004, 429, 827–833, doi:10.1038/nature02691.
[18]  Munday, P.L.; Leis, J.M.; Lough, J.M.; Paris, C.B.; Kingsford, M.J.; Berumen, M.L.; Lambrechts, J. Climate change and coral reef connectivity. Coral Reefs 2009, 28, 379–395, doi:10.1007/s00338-008-0461-9.
[19]  Grant, W.A.S.; Bowen, B.W. Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: Insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation. J. Hered. 1998, 89, 415–426.
[20]  Craig, M.T.; Eble, J.A.; Bowen, B.W.; Robertson, D.R. High genetic connectivity across the Indian and Pacific Oceans in the reef fish Myripristis berndti (Holocentridae). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2007, 334, 245–254, doi:10.3354/meps334245.
[21]  Klanten, O.S.; Choat, J.H.; Van Herwerden, L. Extreme genetic diversity and temporal rather than spatial partitioning in a widely distributed coral reef fish. Mar. Biol. 2007, 150, 659–670.
[22]  Horne, J.B.; Van Herwerden, L.; Choat, J.H.; Robertson, D.R. High population connectivity across the Indo-Pacific: Congruent lack of phylogeographic structure in three reef fish congeners. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49, 629–638.
[23]  Gaither, M.R.; Toonen, R.J.; Robertson, D.R.; Planes, S.; Bowen, B.W. Genetic evaluation of marine biogeographical barriers: Perspectives from two widespread Indo-Pacific snappers (Lutjanus kasmira and Lutjanus fulvus). J. Biogeogr. 2010, 37, 133–147.
[24]  Briggs, J.C. Marine zoogeography; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1974.
[25]  Allen, G.R.; Steene, R.C.; Allen, M. A guide to angelfishes & butterflyfishes; Odyssey Publishing/Tropical Reef Research: Perth, Australia, 1998.
[26]  Eble, J.A.; Toonen, R.J.; Bowen, B.W. Endemism and dispersal: Comparative phylogeography of three surgeonfishes across the hawaiian archipelago. Mar. Biol. 2009, 156, 689–698.
[27]  Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989.
[28]  Lee, W.J.; Conroy, J.; Howell, W.H.; Kocher, T.D. Structure and evolution of teleost mitochondrial control regions. J. Mol. Evol. 1995, 41, 54–66.
[29]  Hall, T. Bioedit: Biological Sequence Alignment; Ibis biosciences: Carlsbad, CA, USA, 2007.
[30]  Schneider, S.; Roessli, D.; Excoffier, L. Arlequin: A Software for Population Genetics Data Analysis; Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
[31]  Rohlf, F.J. Algorithm 76. Hierarchical clustering using the minimum spanning tree. Comput. J. 1973, 16, 93–95.
[32]  Nei, M. Molecular evolutionary genetics; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1987.
[33]  Tamura, K.; Dudley, J.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1596–1599.
[34]  Zwickl, D.J. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas, Austin, 2006.
[35]  Swofford, D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2003. Information confirmed correct.
[36]  Bay, L.; Choat, J.H.; Herwerden, L.; Robertson, D.R. High genetic diversities and complex genetic structure in an Indo-Pacific tropical reef fish (Chlorurus sordidus): Evidence of an unstable evolutionary past? Mar. Biol. 2004, 144, 757–767, doi:10.1007/s00227-003-1224-3.
[37]  Bowen, B.W.; Muss, A.; Rocha, L.A.; Grant, W.S. Shallow mtdna coalescence in atlantic pygmy angelfishes (genus Centropyge) indicates a recent invasion from the indian ocean. J. Hered. 2006, 97, 1–12.
[38]  Hickey, A.J.R.; Lavery, S.D.; Hannan, D.A.; Baker, C.S.; Clements, K.D. New zealand triplefin fishes (family tripterygiidae): Contrasting population structure and mtDNA diversity within a marine species flock. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 680–696.
[39]  Winters, K.L.; van Herwerden, L.; Choat, J.H.; Robertson, D. Phylogeography of the indo-pacific parrotfish Scarus psittacus: Isolation generates distinctive peripheral populations in two oceans. Mar. Biol. 2010, 157, 1679–1691, doi:10.1007/s00227-010-1442-4.
[40]  Hamrick, J.; Godt, M. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources; Brown, A., Clegg, M., Kahler, A., Weir, B., Eds.; Sinauer: Sunderland, UK, 1989; pp. 43–63.
[41]  Hobbs, J.-P.A.; Jones, G.P.; Munday, P.L. Extinction risk in endemic marine fishes. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25, 1053–1055, doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01698.x.
[42]  Hobbs, J.-P.A.; Jones, G.; Munday, P. Rarity and extinction risk in coral reef angelfishes on isolated islands: Interrelationships among abundance, geographic range size and specialisation. Coral Reefs 2010, 29, 1–11, doi:10.1007/s00338-009-0580-y.
[43]  Lewis, P.O.; Crawford, D.J. Pleistocene refugium endemics exhibit greater allozymic diversity than widespread congeners in the genus Polygonella (Polygonaceae). Am. J. Bot. 1995, 141–149.
[44]  Aleksi?, J.M.; Geburek, T. Mitochondrial DNA reveals complex genetic structuring in a stenoendemic conifer Picea omorika [(pan?.) purk.] caused by its long persistence within the refugial Balkan region. Plant System. Evol. 2010, 285, 1–11, doi:10.1007/s00606-009-0250-0.
[45]  Voris, H.K. Maps of pleistocene sea levels in southeast asia: Shorelines, river systems and time durations. J. Biogeogr. 2000, 27, 1153–1167, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00489.x.
[46]  Froese, R.; Pauly, D. Fishbase. International centre for living aquatic resource management, manila. Available online: http://www.fishbase.org (accessed on 20 January 2013).
[47]  Torres-Díaz, C.; Ruiz, E.; González, F.; Fuentes, G.; Cavieres, L.A. Genetic diversity in Nothofagus alessandrii (Fagaceae), an endangered endemic tree species of the coastal Maulino forest of central Chile. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 75–82, doi:10.1093/aob/mcm073.
[48]  Fatemi, M.; Gross, C.L. Life on the edge-high levels of genetic diversity in a cliff population of Bertya ingramii are attributed to B. rosmarinifolia (Euphorbiaceae). Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 1461–1468, doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.014.
[49]  Zidana, H.; Turner, G.F.; van Oosterhout, C.; H?nfling, B. Elevated mtDNA diversity in introduced populations of Cynotilapia afra (günther 1894) in Lake Malawi National Park is evidence for multiple source populations and hybridization. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 4380–4389.
[50]  Bay, L.K.; Caley, M.J. Greater genetic diversity in spatially restricted coral reef fishes suggests secondary contact among differentiated lineages. Diversity 2011, 3, 483–502.
[51]  Hobbs, J.-P.A.; Salmond, J.K. Cohabitation of Indian and Pacific Ocean species at Christmas and Cocos (Keeling) Islands. Coral Reefs 2008, 27, 933–933, doi:10.1007/s00338-008-0399-y.
[52]  Hobbs, J.-P.A.; Frisch, A.J.; Allen, G.R.; van Herwerden, L. Marine hybrid hotspot at Indo-Pacific biogeographic border. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5, 258–261.
[53]  Schultz, J.K.; Pyle, R.L.; DeMartini, E.; Bowen, B.W. Genetic connectivity among color morphs and pacific archipelagos for the flame angelfish, Centropyge loriculus. Mar. Biol. 2007, 151, 167–175, doi:10.1007/s00227-006-0471-5.
[54]  Brothers, E.B.; Thresher, R.E. Pelagic duration, dispersal, and the distribution of Indo-Pacific coral reef fishes. In The ecology of coral reefs; Reaka, M.L., Ed.; NOAA: Washington, DC, USA, 1985; Volume 1, pp. 53–70.
[55]  Stobutzki, I.C.; Bellwood, D.R. Sustained swimming abilities of the late pelagic stages of coral reef fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1997, 149, 35–41, doi:10.3354/meps149035.
[56]  McMillan, W.O.; Palumbi, S.R. Rapid rate of control-region evolution in Pacific butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). J. Mol. Evol. 1997, 45, 473–484, doi:10.1007/PL00006252.
[57]  Bellwood, D.R.; Herwerden, L.; Konow, N. Evolution and biogeography of marine angelfishes (pisces: Pomacanthidae). Mol. Phylo. Evol. 2004, 33, 140–155, doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.04.015.
[58]  Johannesson, K.; André, C. Life on the margin: Genetic isolation and diversity loss in a peripheral marine ecosystem, the Baltic sea. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15, 2013–2029, doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02919.x.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133