全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Agriculture  2013 

The Importance of Groves for Cattle in Semi-Open Pastures

DOI: 10.3390/agriculture3010147

Keywords: browsing, bushes, comfort behavior, self-medication, preference, sheltering

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Groves are of ecological importance, but can reduce the productivity of pastures. They may be used by cattle for nutrition as well as for comfort and shelter. To describe the importance and to estimate the influence of cattle on groves, the behavior of cattle around trees and shrubs was observed on six semi-open pastures in the mountain range of Thuringia and the Southern Black Forest (Germany). The groves were divided into formations, species and structures. The cattle used the groves more for browsing than rubbing. Significantly preferred species calculated by Chesson-Index were dogwood ( Cornus sanguinea), black elder ( Sambucus nigra), fly honeysuckle ( Lonicera xylosteum), plum ( Prunus domestica), osier ( Salix viminalis), white beam ( Sorbus chamaemespilus), and guelder rose ( Viburnum opulus). The browsing preference is discussed in relation to nutritional importance and as self-medication. Cattle suppressed some species according to the utilization frequency, but for other species, there was no correlation. The animals preferred the tree hedges in comparison to the other formations. Hedges were utilized as shelter in extreme weather. In addition, under high browsing pressure, hedges were sustained and regenerated. Hedges on pastures turned out to be important for cattle under several aspects and accordingly should be preserved.

References

[1]  Barth, W.-E. Naturschutz.: Das Machbare, 2nd ed.; Paul Parey Verlag: Hamburg, Germany, 1995; pp. 242–248.
[2]  Costa, W. Landschaftspflegerische Ma?nahmen im Rahmen der Flurbereinigung. Schutzpflanzungen in der freien Landschaft. Natur. Landsch. 1978, 53, 53–59.
[3]  Zw?lfer, H.; Bauer, G.; Hensinger, G.; Stechmann, D. Die tier?kologische Bedeutung und Bewertung von Hecken. Ber. ANL Laufen 1984, 1–155.
[4]  Schroeder, H. Zur Bedeutung der Wallhecken in einem Agraroekosystem Schleswig-Holsteins. 1. Besiedlung der Wallhecken durch Voegel. Z. Kulturtechnik Flurberein. 1988, 29, 294–299.
[5]  Brock, J.H. Livestock: Biological control in brush/weed management programs. Rangelands 1988, 10, 32–34.
[6]  Lefroy, E.C.; Dann, P.R.; Wildin, J.H.; Wesley-Smith, R.N.; McGowan, A.A. Trees and shrubs as sources of fodder in australia. Agrofor. Syst. 1992, 20, 117–139, doi:10.1007/BF00055307.
[7]  Mayer, A.C.; St?ckli, V.; Huovinen, C.; Konold, W.; Estermann, B.L.; Kreuzer, M. Herbage selection by cattle on sub-alpine wood pastures. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 181, 39–50, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00127-0.
[8]  Mitchell, J.E.; Rodgers, R.T. Food habits and distribution of cattle on a forest pasture range in Northern Idaho. J. Range Manag. 1985, 38, 214–220, doi:10.2307/3898969.
[9]  Chesson, J. Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 1978, 59, 211–215, doi:10.2307/1936364.
[10]  Buchholtz, C. Rinder. In Grzimeks Enzyklop?die S?ugetiere; Grzimek, B., Ed.; Kindler-Verlag: München, Germany, 1988; Volume Band 5, pp. 360–397.
[11]  Sambraus, H.H. Spezielle Ethologie: Rind. In Nutztierethologie: Das Verhalten Landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere, 1st; Sambraus, H.H., Ed.; Verlag Paul Parey: Berlin, Germany, 1978; pp. 49–127.
[12]  Hafez, E.S.E. Behavioral Adaptation. In Adaptation of Domestic Animals; Hafez, E.S.E., Ed.; Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1968; pp. 202–214.
[13]  Arnold, G.W.; Dudzinski, M.L. Ethology of Free-Ranging Domestic Animals; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1978; pp. 1–198.
[14]  Langbein, J.; Nichelmann, M. Differences in behaviour of free-ranging cattle in the tropic climate. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1993, 37, 197–209, doi:10.1016/0168-1591(93)90111-2.
[15]  Mitl?hner, F.M.; Laube, R.B. Chronobiological indicators of heat stress in Bos Indicus cattle in the tropics. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2003, 2, 654–659.
[16]  Duncan, P. Horses and Grasses: The Nutritional Ecology of Equids and Their Impact on the Camargue; Springer Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1992; pp. 1–287.
[17]  Buttensch?n, R.M.; Buttensch?n, J. The effect of browsing by cattle and sheep on trees and bushes. Nat. Jutlandica 1978, 20, 79–94.
[18]  Fraser, A.F.; Broom, D.M. Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare, 3rd ed.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 1996; pp. 1–448.
[19]  Hüppe, J. Vegetationsdynamik in halboffenen Hudelandschaften—Abh?ngigkeit von Nutzungsintensit?t und natürlichen Ausgangsbedingungen sowie Anforderungen an künftige Naturschutzziele. Schriftenr. Landschaftspflege Naturschutz Bonn-Bad Godesb. 1997, 54, 145–159.
[20]  Rahmann, G. Praktische Anleitungen für eine Biotoppflege mit Nutztieren. Schriftenr. Angew. Naturschutz 1998, 14, 113.
[21]  Stuth, J.W. Foraging Behavior. In Grazing Management: An Ecological Perspective; Heitschmidt, R.K., Stuth, J.W., Eds.; Timer Press: Portland, OR, USA, 1991; pp. 65–83.
[22]  Bokdam, J.; Gleichman, J.M.; van Wieren, S.E.; de Vries, M.F.W. Free-Ranging Cattle as Opportunistic Exploiters of a Successional Woodland-Grassland-Heathland Mosaic. In Nature Conservation and Grazing Management; Bokdam, J., Ed.; Ponsen and Looyen b.v.: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 87–116.
[23]  Silva-Pando, F.J.; Lorenzo, M.J.R.; Pilar, M.; Hernandez, G. Grasslands and Scrublands in the Northwest of the Iberian Peninsula: Silvopastoral Systems and Nature Conservation. In Pasture Landscapes and Nature Conservation; Redecker, B., H?rdtle, W., Finck, P., Riecken, U., Schr?der, E., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2002; pp. 271–283.
[24]  Gerken, B.; Sonnenburg, H. Landscape Development and Species Protection in Woodlands, Forests and Pastures Using Large Herbivores. In Pasture Landscapes and Nature Conservation; Redecker, B., H?rdtle, W., Finck, P., Riecken, U., Schr?der, E., Eds.; Springer Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2002; pp. 285–301.
[25]  H?rdtle, W.; Mierwald, U.; Behrends, T.; Eischeid, I.; Garniel, A.; Grell, H.; Haese, D.; Schneider-Fenske, A.; Voigt, N. Pasture Landscapes in Germany—Progress towards Sustainable Use of Agricultural Land. In Pasture Landscapes and Nature Conservation; Redecker, B., H?rdtle, W., Finck, P., Riecken, U., Schr?der, E., Eds.; Springer Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2002; pp. 147–160.
[26]  Schwabe, A.; Kratochwil, A. Weidbuchen im Schwarzwald und ihre Entstehung durch Verbi? des W?lderviehs: Verbreitung, Geschichte und M?glichkeiten der Verjüngung. Beih. Ver?ff. Naturschutz Landschaftspflege 1987, 49, 1–120.
[27]  Lozano, G.A. Parasitic stress and self-medication in wild animals. Adv. Study Behav. 1998, 27, 291–317, doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60367-8.
[28]  Paciullo, D.S.C.; de Castro, C.R.T.; de Miranda Gomide, C.A.; Maurício, R.M.; de Fátima ávila Pires, M.; Müller, M.D.; Ferreira Xavier, D. Performance of dairy heifers in a silvopastoral system. Livestock Sci. 2011, 141, 166–172, doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.05.012.
[29]  Krasinska, M.; Cabon-Raczynska, K.; Krasinski, Z.A. Strategy of habitat utilization by European Bison in the Bialowieza Forest. Acta. Theriol. 1987, 32, 147–202.
[30]  Persson, I.L.; Danell, K.; Bergstr?m, R. Disturbance by large herbivores in boreal forests with special reference to moose. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 2000, 37, 251–263.
[31]  Vera, F.W.M. Grazing Ecology and Forest History; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2000; pp. 1–506.
[32]  Vera, F.W.M. Ohne Pferd und Rind wird die Eiche nicht überleben. Natur.-und Kulturlandschaft. 1998, 3, 404–424.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133