全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Combining Neural Methods and Knowledge-Based Methods in Accident Management

DOI: 10.1155/2012/534683

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Accident management became a popular research issue in the early 1990s. Computerized decision support was studied from many points of view. Early fault detection and information visualization are important key issues in accident management also today. In this paper we make a brief review on this research history mostly from the last two decades including the severe accident management. The author’s studies are reflected to the state of the art. The self-organizing map method is combined with other more or less traditional methods. Neural methods used together with knowledge-based methods constitute a methodological base for the presented decision support prototypes. Two application examples with modern decision support visualizations are introduced more in detail. A case example of detecting a pressure drift on the boiling water reactor by multivariate methods including innovative visualizations is studied in detail. Promising results in early fault detection are achieved. The operators are provided by added information value to be able to detect anomalies in an early stage already. We provide the plant staff with a methodological tool set, which can be combined in various ways depending on the special needs in each case. 1. Introduction Accident management grew into an own and popular research branch in the early 1990s. This trend was a kind of delayed reflection of the two serious industrial accidents in the 1980s in Bhopal (1984) and in Chernobyl (1986). It was noticed that most of the earlier studies about abnormal events did not cover very well the severe accident cases. Already the Three Mile Island accident (1979) made the nuclear power plant control room a major focus for the studies of human factors, human reliability, and man-machine interface technology [1]. The Fukushima accident in 2011 has risen the accident management issue up again, although the nature and origin of this accident were completely different. The problem area in the 1990s was identified to begin with information needs and reliability, to be completed with accident mitigation. The presentation methods and information structuring were located to central issues, as the human being was considered often to be the weakest link in the safety systems. The fault diagnosis of abnormal events and the support of operator decision making were naturally completing this entity [2]. Computerized accident management was studied in the 1990s, for instance, in OECD Halden Project, and prototyping systems including also strategic planning features in operator support or technical support

References

[1]  B. K. H. Sun and D. G. Cain, “Computer applications for control room operator support in nuclear power plants,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 331–340, 1991.
[2]  G. Salvendy, Handbook of Human Factors, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1986.
[3]  M. Sirola, “Generating strategies for managing accidents,” Nuclear Engineering International, vol. 39, no. 478, pp. 50–551, 1994.
[4]  M. Sirola, J. Talonen, J. Parviainen, and G. Lampi, “Decision support with data-analysis methods in a nuclear power plant,” TKK Reports in Information and Computer Science (TKK-ICS-R29), TKK, Espoo, Finland, 2010.
[5]  T. Kohonen, Self-Organizing Map, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1995.
[6]  S. B. Eom, “Mapping the intellectual structure of research in decision support systems through author cocitation analysis (1971–1993),” Decision Support Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 315–338, 1996.
[7]  P. Fantoni, G. Meyer, P. Nurmilaukas, M. Sirola, and A. S?renssen, CAMS Prototype, vol. 2, NKS, Halden, Norway, 1995.
[8]  W. E. Kastenberg, “Uncertainties and severe accident management,” Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, vol. 63, pp. 266–2267, 1991.
[9]  M. Sirola, Computerized Decision Support Systems in Failure and Maintenance Management of Safety Critical Processes, VTT, Espoo, Finland, 1999.
[10]  D. Bunn, Applied Decision Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
[11]  S. French, Decision Theory: An Introduction to Mathematics Rationality, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, 1986.
[12]  K. Laakso, M. Sirola, and J. Holmberg, “Decision modelling for maintenance and safety,” International Journal of Comadem, vol. 23, pp. 13–117, 1999.
[13]  J. A. Lee and M. Verleysen, Dimensionality Reduction. Information Science and Statistics, Springer, 1st edition, 2007.
[14]  G. Barreto, A. Araujo, and H. Ritter, “Time in self-organizing maps: an overview of models,” International Journal of Computer Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 139–179, 2001.
[15]  J. Vesanto, J. Himberg, E. Alhoniemi, and J. Parhankangas, “Self-organizing map in matlab: the SOM toolbox,” in Proceedings of the Matlab DSP Conference, 1999.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133