Reflections about reviewers of the scientific papers in Physical Education

This point of view emerged from experience in contribution both as reviewer and author in papers submitted to journals indexed in Physical Education. Some considerations were made: who are the reviewers? What is the role of a reviewer and his contribution to science and society? What is the feedback towards the authors? Therefore, I classified the reviewers as those who "knows everything", "archaic", "owners of the area" and "already that". These suggestions aim to contribute to people who give themselves as a reviewer, for our field of knowledge helps Science and Society.