全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Preoperative versus postoperative initiation of thromboprophylaxis following major orthopedic surgery: safety and efficacy of postoperative administration supported by recent trials of new oral anticoagulants

DOI: 10.1186/1477-9560-9-17

Keywords: Thromboprophylaxis, Hip replacement surgery, Knee replacement surgery, Anticoagulation, Dabigatran etexilate, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication of elective hip and knee replacement surgery. Without thromboprophylaxis, VTE occurs in approximately 40-60% of cases. Hence, evidence-based guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for all patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery [1,2].In many European countries, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is considered the standard therapy for prophylaxis following hip or knee replacement surgery and is initiated preoperatively to maximize efficacy [3]. Preoperative thromboprophylaxis is initiated on the assumption that the surgery itself and the accompanying immobility are the main causes of thrombosis [4-7]. However, as most thrombi develop postoperatively, starting anticoagulant therapy following surgery could also prevent VTE [8-10].Initiation of thromboprophylaxis after surgery has several potential advantages. It simplifies same-day admission for elective procedures and, as therapy is initiated after surgery when patients are hemodynamically stable, there is a lower risk of bleeding. Neuraxial anesthesia is increasingly used in orthopedic surgery, but there is a risk of spinal hematoma and subsequent paralysis, which could be increased by the sustained use of an anticoagulant [11]. Initiation of thromboprophylaxis with LMWH too close to the start of surgery (from -2 h to +4 h of surgery) is associated with an increased risk of bleeding and neuraxial compressive hematoma, so delaying thromboprophylaxis until after a stable clot has been established at the injection site would seem sensible [5,12,13]. The timing of dosing would be dependent upon the onset time (tmax) of the anticoagulant used [13]. In acknowledgement of the increased risk of hematoma associated with preoperative thromboprophylaxis, recent guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine recommend that needle placement should occur at least 10 to 12 h after a preoperative LMWH dose so that the procedure it not

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413