全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

New research finds that the common arguments against the development of cognitive enhancers are misguided

Keywords: cognitive enhancement , cognitive functioning , performance-enhancing drugs , Designer drug , Anti-Doping , Doping , Blood-doping , performance enhancement , Medical ethics , conflict of interest , Internet , Research , Open Access Peer-Reviewed Journal , IOC , International Olympic Committee , WADA , USADA , erythropoietin , EPO

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

As the development of cognitive enhancers gains momentum, questions have arisen about the ethics of issues such as the making or taking of a pill that could boost brain power. New research, however, finds that the common arguments against their development are misguided and should be replaced by an understanding that takes into account the subtle differences of the ethics of enhancement. "Our findings may help steer us toward more fruitful discussions regarding cognitive enhancement," says Thomas H. Murray, PhD, of The Hastings Center in Garrison, NY, "and may aid us in answering questions like: What if we could think better?"

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413