Resource depletion and global warming dictate needs to reduce energy consumption, however energy used for the environmental space conditioning of buildings remains substantial; even in well-designed examples. Therefore the ways in which buildings are utilized, and occupant expectations of comfort in building environments should be researched to determine alternative means for optimizing performance. This paper deals with transition spaces (entrance foyers, circulation zones, lift lobbies, stairways and atria) and thermal comfort experiences. It both reviews existing reported research into comfort in such spaces, and introduces new information from a range of studies completed in recent years. It assesses the usefulness and applicability of design standards which exist, but which are primarily concerned with more permanently (rather than transitorily) occupied spaces within buildings. Three main categories of transition space are identified: entrance zones; circulation zones; and zones of longer residence-time such as atria. The analysis indicates that different design standards, or variations on existing standards, should be considered for application in each type of space. The outcomes of this work suggest opportunities to reduce environmental conditioning and therefore energy use in such spaces; spaces which can make up a significant fraction of the overall floor area/volume of workplace buildings.
References
[1]
ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers). Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy; ANSO-ASHRAE Standard 55-2010; ASHRAE: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010.
[2]
Fanger, P.O. Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Application in Environmental Engineering; Danish Technical Press: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1970.
[3]
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment—Assessment of the Influence of the Thermal Environment Using Subjective Judgement Scales; International Standard EN ISO 10551:2001; ISO: Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
[4]
ISO. Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment—Analytical Determination and Interpretation of Thermal Comfort Using Calculation of the PMV and PPD Indices and Local Thermal Comfort Criteria; International Standard EN ISO 7730:2005; ISO: Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
[5]
BSI (British Standards Institute). Indoor Environmental Input Parameters for Design and Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Addressing Indoor Air Quality, Thermal Environment, Lighting and Acoustics; BS EN 15251:2007; BSI: London, UK, 2007.
[6]
Nicol, F.; Humphreys, M. Derivation of the adaptive equations for thermal comfort in free-running buildings in European standard EN15251. Build. Environ. 2010, 45, 11–17, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.12.013.
[7]
Nicol, F.; Humphreys, M.; Roaf, S. Adaptive Thermal Comfort: Principles and Practice; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2012.
Brager, G.S.; de Dear, R.J. Thermal adaptation in the built environment: A literature review. Energy Build. 1998, 27, 83–96, doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(97)00053-4.
[10]
Fanger, P.O.; Toftum, J. Thermal comfort in the Future—Excellence and expectation. In Proceedings of the Moving Comfort Standards into the 21st Century, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 5–8 April 2001.
[11]
Pitts, A.; Bin Saleh, J.; Sharples, S. Building transition spaces, comfort and energy use. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Dublin, UK, 22–24 October 2008.
[12]
Nicol, J.F.; Jamy, G.N.; Sykes, O.; Humphreys, M.A.; Roaf, S.; Hancock, M. A Survey of Thermal Comfort in Pakistan; Oxford Brookes University: Oxford, UK, 1994.
[13]
Baker, N.; Standeven, M. Thermal comfort for free-running buildings. Energy Build. 1996, 23, 175–182, doi:10.1016/0378-7788(95)00942-6.
[14]
Busch, J.F. A tale of two populations: Thermal comfort in air-conditioned and naturally ventilated office in Thailand. Energy Build. 1992, 18, 235–249, doi:10.1016/0378-7788(92)90016-A.
[15]
Jitkhajornwanich, K.; Pitts, A. Interpretation of thermal responses of four subject groups in transition spaces of buildings in Bangkok. Build. Environ. 2002, 37, 1193–1204, doi:10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00088-9.
[16]
Fisk, D.J. Thermal Control of Buildings; Applied Science Publishers: London, UK, 1981.
[17]
Douvlou, E.; Pitts, A. Glazed spaces in hot climates: The case of the atrium building in a mediterranean climate. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Florianópolis, Brazil, 7–9 November 2001.
[18]
Pitts, A.; Douvlou-Beggiora, E. Post-occupancy analysis of comfort in glazed atrium spaces. In Proceedings of the Closing the Loop: Ways forward for Post-Occupancy Evaluation, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 29 April–2 May 2004.
[19]
Pitts, A. Occupant acceptance of discomfort in an atrium building: To sweat or to shiver. In Proceedings of the Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 9–11 April 2010.
[20]
Kudzmaite, I. Environmental Conditions and Occupant Comfort in Atrium Buildings in SummerM.Sc. Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, 2011.
[21]
Pitts, A.; Bin Saleh, J. Potential for energy saving in building transition spaces. Energy Build. 2007, 39, 815–822, doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.02.006.
