ToSIA (Tool for Sustainability Impact Assessment) offers a transparent and consistent methodological framework to assess impacts of changes (technological, policy, management, etc.) in the forest-based sector. This tool is able to facilitate the decision making process within and between diverse groups of stakeholders (e.g., forest managers and policymakers) as it provides a neutral, transparent and data-driven platform for stakeholder interaction and communication. To test these capabilities of ToSIA, a practical approach to test if a decision support system is suitable for participatory processes was developed based on a set of evaluation criteria for participatory processes. ToSIA’s performance was assessed and discussed in different categories against a selection of criteria for successful participatory processes: six criteria were fulfilled by ToSIA, in nine, ToSIA is potentially helpful, in two, criteria ToSIA has no influence, and for three criteria, no experiences exist until now. As a result, ToSIA’s conceptual suitability as a participatory decision support system was confirmed for two interlinked roles: as a decision support system to assess alternative scenarios, and as a communication platform for stakeholder interaction.
References
[1]
Menzel, S.; Nordstr？m, E.M.; Buchecker, M.; Marques, A.; Saarikoski, H.; Kangas, A. Decision support systems in forest management: Requirements from a participatory planning perspective. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131, 1367–1379, doi:10.1007/s10342-012-0604-y.
[2]
Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on a Forestry Strategy for the European Union. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/fore/publi/1998_649_en.pdf (accessed on 11 April 2013).
[3]
De Janeiro, R. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development; the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA): Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 1992. last updated: 12 January 2000.
[4]
State of Europe’s Forests 2011: Status and Trends in Sustainable Forest Management in Europe; FOREST EUROPE Liaison Unit Oslo; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE); Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): ？s, Norway. Published: 16 June 2011, Last updated: 31 January 2013.
[5]
European Commission. Communication from the Commission on Impact Assessment; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
[6]
P？ivinen, R.; Lindner, M.; Rosén, K.; Lexer, M.J. A concept for assessing sustainability impacts of forestry-wood chains. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131, 7–19, doi:10.1007/s10342-010-0446-4.
[7]
Helming, K.; Diehl, K.; Bach, H.; Dilly, O.; K？nig, B.; Kuhlman, T.; Perez-Soba, M.; Sieber, S.; Tabbush, P.; Tscherning, K.; et al. Ex-ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use, Part A: Analytical framework. Ecol. Soc. 2011, 16. in press.
[8]
Tscherning, K.; K？nig, B.; Sch？？er, B.; Helming, K.; Sieber, S. Ex-Ante Impact Assessments (ia) in the European Commission—An overview. In Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes; Helming, K., Pérez-Soba, M., Tabbush, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 17–33.
[9]
Lindner, M.; Suominen, T.; Palosuo, T.; Garcia-Gonzales, J.; Verweij, P.; Zudin, S.; P？ivinen, R. Tosia—A tool for sustainability impact assessment of forest-wood-chains. Ecol. Modell. 2010, 221, 2197–2205, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.08.006.
[10]
Ness, B.; Urbel-Piirsalu, E.; Anderberg, S.; Olsson, L. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 60, 498–508, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023.
[11]
Messner, F.; Zwirner, O.; Karkuschke, M. Participation in multi-criteria decision support for the resolution of a water allocation problem in the spree river basin. Land Use Policy 2006, 23, 63–75, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.008.
[12]
Newham, L.T.H.; Jakeman, A.J.; Letcher, R.A. Stakeholder participation in modeling for integrated catchment assessment and management: An australian case study. Int. Jo. River Basin Manag. 2006, 4, 1–13.
[13]
Milligan, J.; O'Riordan, T.; Nicholson-Cole, S.A.; Watkinson, A.R. Nature conservation for future sustainable shorelines: Lessons from seeking to involve the public. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, 203–213, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.01.004.
[14]
Fürst, C.; Volk, M.; Makeschin, F. Squaring the circle? Combining models, indicators, experts and end-users in integrated land-use management support tools. Environ. Manag. 2010, 46, 829–833, doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9574-3.
[15]
Borja, A.; Bricker, S.B.; Dauer, D.M.; Demetriades, N.T.; Ferreira, J.G.; Forbes, A.T.; Hutchings, P.; Jia, X.; Kenchington, R.; Marques, J.C.; et al. Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008, 56, 1519–1537, doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.07.005.
[16]
Giupponi, C. Decision support systems for implementing the european water framework directive: The mulino approach. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22, 248–258, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.024.
[17]
Zapatero, E.G. A quality assessment instrument for multi-criteria decision support software. Benchmarking Qual. Manag. Technol. 1996, 3, 17–27, doi:10.1108/14635779610153336.
[18]
Newman, S.; Lynch, T.; Plummer, A.A. Success and failure of decision support systems: Learning as we go. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 77, 1–12.
[19]
Uran, O.; Janssen, R. Why are spatial decision support systems not used? Some experiences from the netherlands. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2003, 27, 511–526, doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00064-9.
[20]
FORSYS, Cost action fp0804. Forest management decision support systems (forsys). Available online: http://fp0804.emu.ee/wiki/index.php/Category:DSS (accessed on 14 August 2012).
[21]
Palosuo, T.; Suominen, T.; Werhahn-Mees, W.; Garcia-Gonzales, J.; Lindner, M. Assigning results of the tool for sustainability impact assessment (tosia) to products of a forest-wood-chain. Ecol. Modell. 2010, 221, 2215–2225, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.03.020.
[22]
Lindner, M.; Werhahn-Mees, W.; Suominen, T.; V？tter, D.; Pekkanen, M.; Zudin, S.; Roubalova, M.; Kneblik, P.; Brüchert, F.; Valinger, E.; et al. Conducting sustainability impact assessments of forestry-wood chains—Examples of tosia applications. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 2012, 21–34.
Pülzl, H.; Prokofieva, I.; Berg, S.; Rametsteiner, E.; Aggestam, F.; Wolfslehner, B. Indicator development in sustainability impact assessment: Balancing theory and practice. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131, 35–46, doi:10.1007/s10342-011-0547-8.
[25]
Wolfslehner, B.; Brüchert, F.; Fischbach, J.; Rammer, W.; Becker, G.; Lindner, M.; Lexer, M. Exploratory multi-criteria analysis in sustainability impact assessment of forest-wood chains: The example of a regional case study in baden-württemberg. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131, 47–56, doi:10.1007/s10342-011-0499-z.
[26]
Prokofieva, I.; Lucas, B.; Thorsen, B.J.; Carlsen, K. Deliverable d1.5.6. Monetary Values of Environmental and Social Externalities for the Purpose of Cost-Benefit Analysis in the EFORWOOD Project; Forest Technological Center of Catalonia (CTFC): Solsona, Spain, 2010.
[27]
Pizzirani, S.; Gardiner, B.; Edwards, D. Analysing forest sustainability under various climate change scenarios: A case study in Northern Scotland. In Proceedings of the 18th Commonwealth Forestry Conference, Edinburgh/Scotland, UK, 28 June–2 July 2010.
[28]
Den Herder, M.; Kolstr？m, M.; Lindner, M.; Suominen, T.; Tuomasjukka, D.; Pekkanen, M. Sustainability impact assessment on the production and use of different wood and fossil fuels used for energy production in North Karelia, Finland. Energies 2012, 2012, 4870–4891.
[29]
Kolstr？m, P.M.; Karppinen, H.; den Herder, M.; Suominen, T.; V？tter, D.; Lindner, M. The application of a sustainability impact assessment tool to support regional sustainable development planning in North Karelia, Finland. In Proceedings of Dubrovnik Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 25–30 September 2011.
[30]
Berg, S.; Valinger, E.; Lind, T. Forestry and reindeer husbandry in northern sweden—The mal？ case study in the northern tosia research project. In Proceedings of Dubrovnik Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 25-30 September 2011.
[31]
Valinger, E.; Berg, S.; Lind, T. Effekter av ett skogsbruk anpassat till renn？ring och naturv？rd i norra sverige (in Swedish). Fakta Skog 2011, 2011, 1–4.
[32]
Webler, T.; Tuler, S.; Krueger, R.O.B. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environ. Manag. 2001, 27, 435–450, doi:10.1007/s002670010160.
[33]
Blackstock, K.L.; Kelly, G.J.; Horsey, B.L. Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 60, 726–742, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.014.
[34]
Tuler, T.; Webler, S. Voices from the forest: What participants expect of a public participation process. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1999, 12, 437–453, doi:10.1080/089419299279524.
[35]
Rowe, G.; Frewer, L. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2000, 25, 3–29, doi:10.1177/016224390002500101.
[36]
Duinker, P.N. Public participation’s promising progress: Advances in forest decision-making in canada. Commonw. For. Rev. 1998, 77, 107–112.
[37]
Sheppard, S.; Meitner, M. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 207, 171–187, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.032.
[38]
Innes, J.E.; Booher, D.E. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 1999, 65, 412–423, doi:10.1080/01944369908976071.
[39]
McCool, S.; Guthrie, K. Mapping the dimensions of successful public participation in messy natural resources management situations. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2001, 14, 309–323.
[40]
Moote, M.A.; McClaran, M.P. Viewpoint: Implications of participatory democracy for public land planning. J. Range Manag. 1997, 50, 473–481, doi:10.2307/4003701.
[41]
Berg, S. Eforwood deliverable pd0.0.16: Manual for Data Collection for Regional and European Cases—Update 3 September 2008; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2008.
[42]
Aggestam, F.; Weiss, G. An Updated and Further Elaborated Policy Database and a Tested Prototype of Policy Analysis Interface for ToSIA. Technical Report; The European Forest Institute (EFI): Joensuu, Finland, 2011.
[43]
Vogelpohl, T.; Aggestam, F. Public policies as institutions for sustainability: Potentials of the concept and findings from assessing sustainability in the European forest-based sector. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131, 57–71, doi:10.1007/s10342-011-0504-6.
[44]
Wolfslehner, B.; Rammer, W.; Lexer, M.J. Implementing a participatory multi-criteria evaluation tool for sustainability impact assessment of forest-wood chains. In SHAPE YOUR SUSTAINABILITY TOOLS—And Let Your Tools Shape You; Rosen, K., Ed.; Skogforsk: Uppsala, Sweden, 2009; p. 15.
[45]
Edwards, D.; Jensen, F.S.; Marzano, M.; Mason, B.; Pizzirani, S.; Schelhaas, M.J. A theoretical framework to assess the impacts of forest management on the recreational value of european forests. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 81–89, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.06.006.
[46]
Volk, M.; Lautenbach, S.; van Delden, H.; Newham, L.T.H.; Seppelt, R. How can we make progress with decision support systems in landscape and river basin management? Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of four different decision support systems. Environ. Manag. 2010, 46, 834–849, doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9417-2.
[47]
Vso Facilitator Guide to Participatory Approaches; Department for International Development (DFID): London, UK, 2009. Available online: http://community.eldis.org/.59c6ec19/ (accessed on 10 April 2012).
[48]
Good Practices in Participatory Mapping; The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD): Rome, Italy, 2009. Available online: http://www.ifad.org/pub/map/PM_web.pdf (accessed on 10 April 2012).
Wikstr？m, P.; Edenius, L.; Elfving, B.O.; Eriksson Ljusk, O.; L？m？s, T.; Johan, S.; ？hman, K.; Wallerman, J.; Waller, C.; Klinteb？ck, F. The Heureka forestry decision support system: An overview. Math. Comput. For. Nat.-Resour. Sci. 2011, 3, 87–94.
[51]
Mendoza, G.A.; Martins, H. Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 230, 1–22, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023.
[52]
Hiltunen, V.; Kurttila, M.; Leskinen, P.; Pasanen, K.; Pyk？l？inen, J. Mesta: An internet-based decision-support application for participatory strategic-level natural resources planning. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11, 1–9, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.004.
