全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Generalized -Type I Univex Functions in Multiobjective Optimization

DOI: 10.1155/2012/279215

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A new class of generalized functions -type I univex is introduced for a nonsmooth multiobjective programming problem. Based upon these generalized functions, sufficient optimality conditions are established. Weak, strong, converse, and strict converse duality theorems are also derived for Mond-Weir-type multiobjective dual program. 1. Introduction Generalizations of convexity related to optimality conditions and duality for nonlinear single objective or multiobjective optimization problems have been of much interest in the recent past and thus explored the extent of optimality conditions and duality applicability in mathematical programming problems. Invexity theory was originated by Hanson [1]. Many authors have then contributed in this direction. For a nondifferentiable multiobjective programming problem, there exists a generalisation of invexity to locally Lipschitz functions with gradients replaced by the Clarke generalized gradient. Zhao [2] extended optimality conditions and duality in nonsmooth scalar programming assuming Clarke generalized subgradients under type I functions. However, Antczak [3] used directional derivative in association with a hypothesis of an invex kind following Ye [4]. On the other hand, Bector et al. [5] generalized the notion of convexity to univex functions. Rueda et al. [6] obtained optimality and duality results for several mathematical programs by combining the concepts of type I and univex functions. Mishra [7] obtained optimality results and saddle point results for multiobjective programs under generalized type I univex functions which were further generalized to univex type I-vector-valued functions by Mishra et al. [8]. Jayswal [9] introduced new classes of generalized -univex type I vector valued functions and established sufficient optimality conditions and various duality results for Mond-Weir type dual program. Generalizing the work of Antczak [3], recently Nahak and Mohapatra [10] obtained duality results for multiobjective programming problem under invexity assumptions. In this paper, by combining the concepts of Mishra et al. [8] and Nahak and Mohapatra [10], we introduce a new generalized class of -type I univex functions and establish weak, strong, converse, and strict converse duality results for Mond-Weir type dual. 2. Preliminaries and Definitions The following convention of vectors in will be followed throughout this paper: , ; , ; , . Let be a nonempty subset of , , be an arbitrary point of and ,?? ,?? . Also, we denote and and and . Definition 2.1 (Ben-Israel and Mond [11]). Let be an invex set. A

References

[1]  M. A. Hanson, “On sufficiency of the Kuhn-Tucker conditions,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 545–550, 1981.
[2]  F. A. Zhao, “On sufficiency of the Kuhn-Tucker conditions in nondifferentiable programming,” Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 385–389, 1992.
[3]  T. Antczak, “Multiobjective programming under -invexity,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2002.
[4]  Y. L. Ye, “ -invexity and optimality conditions,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 242–249, 1991.
[5]  C. R. Bector, S. K. Suneja, and S. Gupta, “Univex functions and univex nonlinear programming,” in Proceeding of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, pp. 115–124, 1992.
[6]  N. G. Rueda, M. A. Hanson, and C. Singh, “Optimality and duality with generalized convexity,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 491–500, 1995.
[7]  S. K. Mishra, “On multiple-objective optimization with generalized univexity,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 224, no. 1, pp. 131–148, 1998.
[8]  S. K. Mishra, S.-Y. Wang, and K. K. Lai, “Optimality and duality for multiple-objective optimization under generalized type I univexity,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 303, no. 1, pp. 315–326, 2005.
[9]  A. Jayswal, “On sufficiency and duality in multiobjective programming problem under generalized -type I univexity,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 207–216, 2010.
[10]  C. Nahak and R. N. Mohapatra, “ -invexity in multiobjective optimization,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 2288–2296, 2009.
[11]  A. Ben-Israel and B. Mond, “What is invexity?” Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society B, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1986.
[12]  F. H. Clarke, Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, Canadian Mathematical Society Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1983.
[13]  K. Miettinen, Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, vol. 12 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass, USA, 1999.
[14]  S. K. Mishra, S. Y. Wang, and K. K. Lai, “Optimality and duality in nondifferentiable and multiobjective programming under generalized -invexity,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 425–438, 2004.
[15]  M. A. Hanson and B. Mond, “Necessary and sufficient conditions in constrained optimization,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 1987.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133