全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Effects of Meditation on Temporal Processing and Speech Perceptual Skills in Younger and Older Adults

DOI: 10.1155/2013/304057

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to assess the temporal processing and speech perception abilities in older adults who were practicing meditation for more than five years. Participants were comprised of three groups, 30 young adults (“YA”) in the age range of 20–30 years, 30 older adults in the age range of 50–65 years who practiced meditation for a period of five years or more (effective meditators “EM”), and 51 age matched older adults who did not have any experience of meditation (non-meditators “NM”). Temporal processing was evaluated using gap detection in noise, duration discrimination, modulation detection, and backward masking and duration pattern tests. Speech perception was measured in presence of a four-talker babble at ?5?dB signal to noise ratio and with the vocoded stimuli. Results revealed that EM group performed significantly better than NM group in all psychophysical and speech perception tasks except in gap detection task. In the gap detection task, two groups did not differ significantly. Furthermore, EM group showed significantly better modulation detection thresholds compared to YA. Results of the study demonstrate that the practice of meditation not only offsets the decline in temporal and speech processing abilities due to aging process but also improves the ability to perceive the modulations compared to young adults. 1. Introduction Auditory temporal processing is the perception of sound or of the alteration of sound within a restricted or defined time domain [1]. Speech stimuli and other background sounds are dynamic in terms of both amplitude and frequency. Perception of this variation in amplitude and frequency is crucial to understand speech in quiet and more so in background noise [2]. Psychophysical evidence indicates deterioration in a broad spectrum of auditory abilities as a result of chronological aging [3]. Thus, the deterioration in temporal processing may also be expected with the aging. Evidence for deterioration of temporal processing with age predominantly comes from studies on gap detection. Investigators have shown increased gap detection thresholds in elderly population [4–7]. Some investigators have used simple tonal or noise signals and reported age-related difficulties in detection of gap [6, 8], whereas others have used more complex stimuli or increased task demands and shown more pronounced differences between younger and older listeners [9]. Additionally, older individuals are also shown to have difficulties with auditory sequencing tasks that require discrimination or recognition of temporal order of the

References

[1]  J. B. Shinn and F. E. Musiek, “Temporal processing: the basics,” Hearing Journal, vol. 56, no. 7, p. 52, 2003.
[2]  S. Gordon-Salant and P. J. Fitzgibbons, “Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners,” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1276–1285, 1993.
[3]  P. J. Fitzgibbons and S. Gordon-Salant, “Behavioral studies with aging humans: hearing sensitivity and psychoacoustics,” in The Aging Auditory System, S. Gordon-Salant, R. D. Frisina, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay, Eds., Springer, London, UK, 2010.
[4]  D. M. Green, “Temporal auditory acuity,” Psychological Review, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 540–551, 1971.
[5]  P. J. Fitzgibbons and F. L. Wightman, “Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 761–765, 1982.
[6]  K. B. Snell, “Age-related changes in temporal gap detection,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 2214–2220, 1997.
[7]  U. Ajith Kumar and A. V. Sangamanatha, “Temporal processing abilities across different age groups,” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 2011.
[8]  B. A. Schneider, M. K. Pichora-Fuller, D. Kowalchuk, and M. Lamb, “Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 980–991, 1994.
[9]  P. J. Fitzgibbons and S. Gordon-Salant, “Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 3140–3145, 1995.
[10]  P. J. Fitzgibbons and S. Gordon-Salant, “Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners,” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 183–189, 1996.
[11]  P. J. Fitzgibbons and S. Gordon-Salant, “Auditory temporal order perception in younger and older adults,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1052–1060, 1998.
[12]  L. E. Humes and L. Christopherson, “Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory processing deficits,” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 686–693, 1991.
[13]  L. J. Trainor and S. E. Trehub, “Aging and auditory temporal sequencing: ordering the elements of repeating tone patterns,” Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 417–426, 1989.
[14]  J. C. Cooper and G. A. Gates, “Hearing in the elderly—the framingham cohort, 1983–1985: part II. Prevalence of central auditory processing disorders,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 304–311, 1991.
[15]  J. P. Walton, H. Simon, R. D. Frisina, and P. Giraudet, “Age-related alterations in the neural coding of envelope periodicities,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 565–578, 2002.
[16]  P. J. Price and H. J. Simon, “Perception of temporal differences in speech by “normal-hearing” adults: effects of age and intensity,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 405–410, 1984.
[17]  S. Rosen, J. Walliker, J. A. Brimacombe, and B. J. Edgerton, “Prosodic and segmental aspects of speech perception with the house/3M single-channel implant,” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 93–111, 1989.
[18]  K. L. Bopp and P. Verhaeghen, “Aging and verbal memory span: a meta-analysis,” Journals of Gerontology B, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. P223–P233, 2005.
[19]  H. A. Slagter, A. Lutz, L. L. Greischar et al., “Mental training affects distribution of limited brain resources,” PLoS Biology, vol. 5, no. 6, article e138, 2007.
[20]  Y.-Y. Tang, Y. Ma, J. Wang et al., “Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 43, pp. 17152–17156, 2007.
[21]  G. L. Xiong and P. M. Doraiswamy, “Does meditation enhance cognition and brain plasticity?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1172, pp. 63–69, 2009.
[22]  A. Chiesa and A. Serretti, “A systematic review of neurobiological and clinical features of mindfulness meditations,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1239–1252, 2010.
[23]  S. W. Lazar, C. E. Kerr, R. H. Wasserman et al., “Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness,” NeuroReport, vol. 16, no. 17, pp. 1893–1897, 2005.
[24]  E. B. Short, S. Kose, Q. Mu et al., “Regional brain activation during meditation shows time and practice effects: an exploratory FMRI study,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 121–127, 2010.
[25]  B. R. Cahn and J. Polich, “Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 180–211, 2006.
[26]  E. B. Short, S. Kose, Q. Mu et al., “Regional brain activation during meditation shows time and practice effects: an exploratory FMRI study,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 121–127, 2010.
[27]  N. Srinivasan and S. Baijal, “Concentrative meditation enhances preattentive processing: a mismatch negativity study,” NeuroReport, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 1709–1712, 2007.
[28]  M. Grassi and A. Soranzo, “MLP: a MATLAB toolbox for rapid and reliable auditory threshold estimation,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2009.
[29]  D. M. Green, “A maximum-likelihood method for estimating thresholds in a yes-no task,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 2096–2105, 1993.
[30]  D. M. Green, “Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 2662–2674, 1990.
[31]  F. E. Musiek, A. G. Reeves, and J. A. Baran, “Release from central auditory competition in the split-brain patient,” Neurology, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 983–987, 1985.
[32]  K. Nie, G. Stickney, and F.-G. Zeng, “Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 64–73, 2005.
[33]  D. D. Greenwood, “A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 2592–2605, 1990.
[34]  F.-G. Zeng, K. Nie, S. Liu et al., “On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues (L),” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 1351–1354, 2004.
[35]  G. A. Studebaker, “A “rationalized” arcsine transform,” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 455–462, 1985.
[36]  A. Parbery-Clark, D. L. Strait, S. Anderson, E. Hittner, and N. Kraus, “Musical experience and the aging auditory system: implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e18082, 2011.
[37]  A. Heinrich, B. A. Schneider, and F. I. M. Craik, “Investigating the influence of continuous babble on auditory short-term memory performance,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 735–751, 2008.
[38]  M. K. Pichora-Fuller and P. E. Souza, “Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech,” International Journal of Audiology, vol. 42, supplement 2, pp. S11–S16, 2003.
[39]  L. Demany and C. Semal, “The role of memory in auditory perception,” in Auditory Perception of Sound Sources, W. A. Yost, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay, Eds., Springer, New, NY, USA, 2007.
[40]  B. K. H?lzel, U. Ott, H. Hempel et al., “Differential engagement of anterior cingulate and adjacent medial frontal cortex in adept meditators and non-meditators,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 421, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2007.
[41]  E. R. Valentine and P. L. G. Sweet, “Meditation and attention: a comparison of the effects of concentrative versus mindfulness meditation on sustained attention,” Mental Health, Religion and Culture, vol. 2, pp. 59–70, 1999.
[42]  A. P. Jha, J. Krompinger, and M. J. Baime, “Mindfulness training modifies subsystems of attention,” Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–119, 2007.
[43]  P. C. M. Wong, J. X. Jin, G. M. Gunasekera, R. Abel, E. R. Lee, and S. Dhar, “Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 693–703, 2009.
[44]  S. M. Rao, A. R. Mayer, and D. L. Harrington, “The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 317–323, 2001.
[45]  N. Kraus, D. L. Strait, and A. Parbery-Clark, “Cognitive factors shape brain networks for auditory skills: spotlight on auditory working memory,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1252, no. 1, pp. 100–107, 2012.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413