全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Oxidation State of a Polyurethane Membrane after Plasma Etching

DOI: 10.1155/2014/347979

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Low moduli cell culture substrates can be used to apply dynamic mechanical strain to cells, by surface deformation. Understanding the surface interaction with cells is critical to improving cell adhesion and normal growth. A medical grade polyurethane (PU), Chronoflex AL 80A, was modified by oxygen plasma etching and characterised by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Etching resulted in increased cross-linking at the isocyanate bond and formation of new oxygen moieties. The model, derived from patent data and XPS data of the unetched PU, indicated that the additional oxygen was likely to be hydroxyl and carbonyl groups. Etched membranes enhanced protein adhesion, resulting in full surface coverage compared to unetched PU. The etched PU supported cell adhesion and spreading, while the unetched PU was not conducive to monolayer formation. 1. Introduction The human body comprises tissues with a range of elastic moduli. Improving the response of in vitro cell- and tissue-based investigations can be achieved by culturing cells upon a substrate with a modulus closer to that of living tissue, as opposed to tissue culture polystyrene that has a modulus an order of magnitude greater than smooth muscle, for example, [1]. In addition, dynamic modulation of the substrate can provide mechanical signals that drive differentiation or proliferation. Previously, a stable biocompatible polyurethane (PU), Chronoflex AL 80A (AdvanSource Biomaterials, Wilmington, MA), was tested as a low modulus candidate substrate for a bioreactor capable of subjecting cells to a dynamic mechanical environment [2]. PU was selected as it is more resilient [3] and has a better cell response than similar polymers [4]. It was shown that plasma etching is a key factor to the success of cell adhesion and normal cell growth: the wettability was found to be dependent on etching power and duration, while roughness was more affected by the duration [2]. Therefore the state of oxidation of the PU membrane has been examined, in order to understand the effects of plasma etching on protein and cell adhesion. 2. Method 2.1. Membrane Manufacture and Modification PU membranes were produced as described previously [2]. In brief, polyurethane membranes of thickness ?μm (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) were formed by solvent casting with tetrahydrofuran (10% w/w) and drying in a vacuum oven at 50°C. Surface modification was carried out by etching using an inductively coupled RF-source (13.56?MHz) plasma barrel etcher (Biorad PT7100). The sample chamber was evacuated to 8?Pa, purged with oxygen (grade 2

References

[1]  A. J. Engler, M. A. Griffin, S. Sen, C. G. B?nnemann, H. L. Sweeney, and D. E. Discher, “Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 166, no. 6, pp. 877–887, 2004.
[2]  D. M. Moles, C. A. Scotchford, and A. C. Ritchie, “Development of an elastic cell culture substrate for a novel uniaxial tensile strain bioreactor,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, 2013.
[3]  Q. Chen, S. Liang, and G. A. Thouas, “Elastomeric biomaterials for tissue engineering,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 38, no. 3-4, pp. 584–671, 2013.
[4]  C. Moraes, Y. K. Kagoma, B. M. Beca, R. L. M. Tonelli-Zasarsky, Y. Sun, and C. A. Simmons, “Integrating polyurethane culture substrates into poly(dimethylsiloxane) microdevices,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 28, pp. 5241–5250, 2009.
[5]  H. J. Mathieu, “Auger electron spectroscopy,” in Surface Analysis the Principal Techniques, J. Vickerman and I. Gilmore, Eds., pp. 9–46, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK, 2009.
[6]  G. Beamson and D. Briggs, High Resolution XPS of Organic Polymers: The Scienta ESCA300 Database, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1992.
[7]  H. Kim, M. Seo, M.-H. Park, and J. Cho, “A critical size of silicon nano-anodes for lithium rechargeable batteries,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 2146–2149, 2010.
[8]  L.-A. O'Hare, B. Parbhoo, and S. R. Leadley, “Development of a methodology for XPS curve-fitting of the Si 2p core level of siloxane materials,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1427–1434, 2004.
[9]  S. S. Chao, Y. Takagi, G. Lucovsky et al., “Chemical states study of Si in SiOx films grown by PECVD,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 575–583, 1986.
[10]  J. R. Pitts, T. M. Thomas, A. W. Czanderna, and M. Passler, “XPS and ISS of submonolayer coverage of Ag on SiO2,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 107–120, 1986.
[11]  F. Rochet, G. Dufour, H. Roulet et al., “Modification of SiO through room-temperature plasma treatments, rapid thermal annealings, and laser irradiation in a nonoxidizing atmosphere,” Physical Review B, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 6468–6477, 1988.
[12]  B. H. Augustine, W. C. Hughes, K. J. Zimmermann, A. J. Figueiredo, X. Guo, and C. C. Chusuei, “Surface characterization of oxygen-plasma treated poss-based acrylic polymer thin films,” Polymer Preprints, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 789–788, 2007.
[13]  M. Szycher and A. M. Reed, inventors, PolyMedia Industries, assignee. Biostable polyurethane products, 1993.
[14]  G. P. López, D. G. Castner, and B. D. Ratner, “XPS O 1s binding energies for polymers containing hydroxyl, ether, ketone and ester groups,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 267–272, 1991.
[15]  M. J. Hearn, B. D. Ratner, and D. Briggs, “SIMS and XPS studies of polyurethane surfaces. 1. Preliminary studies,” Macromolecules, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 2950–2959, 1988.
[16]  J. C. Bolger, “Acid base interactions between oxide surfaces and polar organic compounds,” in Adhesion Aspects of Polymeric Coatings, K. L. Mittal, Ed., pp. 3–18, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1983.
[17]  B. J. Tyler, B. D. Ratner, D. G. Castner, and D. Briggs, “Variations between Biomer lots. I. Significant differences in the surface chemistry of two lots of a commercial poly(ether urethane),” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 273–289, 1992.
[18]  H.-B. Lin, K. B. Lewis, D. Leach-Scampavia, B. D. Ratner, and S. L. Cooper, “Surface properties of RGD-peptide grafted polyurethane block copolymers: variable take-off angle and cold-stage ESCA studies,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 183–198, 1993.
[19]  D. Zhang, R. S. Ward, Y. R. Shen, and G. A. Somorjai, “Environment-induced surface structural changes of a polymer: an in situ IR + visible sum-frequency spectroscopic study,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 101, no. 44, pp. 9060–9064, 1997.
[20]  S. Evans, “Correction for the effects of adventitious carbon overlayers in quantitative XPS analysis,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 924–930, 1997.
[21]  A. S. Curtis, J. V. Forrester, C. McInnes, and F. Lawrie, “Adhesion of cells to polystyrene surfaces,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 97, no. 5, part 1, pp. 1500–1506, 1983.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413