全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Improving Image Quality in Medical Images Using a Combined Method of Undecimated Wavelet Transform and Wavelet Coefficient Mapping

DOI: 10.1155/2013/797924

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We propose a method for improving image quality in medical images by using a wavelet-based approach. The proposed method integrates two components: image denoising and image enhancement. In the first component, a modified undecimated discrete wavelet transform is used to eliminate the noise. In the second component, a wavelet coefficient mapping function is applied to enhance the contrast of denoised images obtained from the first component. This methodology can be used not only as a means for improving visual quality of medical images but also as a preprocessing module for computer-aided detection/diagnosis systems to improve the performance of screening and detecting regions of interest in images. To confirm its superiority over existing state-of-the-art methods, the proposed method is experimentally evaluated via 30 mammograms and 20 chest radiographs. It is demonstrated that the proposed method can further improve the image quality of mammograms and chest radiographs, as compared to two other methods in the literature. These results reveal the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method. 1. Introduction Denoising and contrast enhancement operations are two of the most common and important techniques for medical image quality improvement. Because of their importance, there has been an enormous amount of research dedicated to the subject of noise removal and image enhancement [1–4]. With regard to image denoising, some approaches using discrete wavelet transform (DWT) have been proposed [5–7]. The DWT is very efficient from a computational point of view, but it is shift variant. Therefore, its denoising performance can change drastically if the starting position of the signal is shifted. In order to achieve shift invariance, researchers have proposed the undecimated DWT (UDWT) [8–10]. Mencattini et al. reported a UDWT-based method for the reduction of noise in mammographic images [11]. The reported method was robust and effective. However, the method was not advantageous in terms of computational aspects. Zhao et al. proposed an image denoising method based on Gaussian and non-Gaussian distribution assumptions for wavelet coefficients [12]. Huang et al. reported on a denoising method which involves directly selecting the thresholds for denoising by evaluating some statistical properties of the noise [13]. Recently, Matsuyama et al. proposed a modified UDWT approach to mammographic denoising [14]. The results demonstrated that the method could further improve image quality and decrease image processing time. As regard to the improvement of

References

[1]  A. Mencattini, M. Salmeri, R. Lojacono, M. Frigerio, and F. Caselli, “Mammographic images enhancement and denoising for breast cancer detection using dyadic wavelet processing,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1422–1430, 2008.
[2]  J. Scharcanski and C. R. Jung, “Denoising and enhancing digital mammographic images for visual screening,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 243–254, 2006.
[3]  D.-Y. Tsai, Y. Lee, and R. Chiba, “An improved adaptive neighborhood contrast enhancement method for medical images,” in Proceedings of the 3rd IASTED International Conference on Medical Engineering, pp. 59–63, BioMed, February 2005.
[4]  B.-W. Yoon and W.-J. Song, “Image contrast enhancement based on the generalized histogram,” Journal of Electronic Imaging, vol. 16, no. 3, Article ID 033005, 2007.
[5]  I. K. Fodor and C. Kamath, “Denoising through wavelet shrinkage: an empirical study,” Journal of Electronic Imaging, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 151–160, 2003.
[6]  C. B. R. Ferreira and D. L. Borges, “Analysis of mammogram classification using a wavelet transform decomposition,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 973–982, 2003.
[7]  D. Cho, T. D. Bui, and G. Chen, “Image denoising based on wavelet shrinkage using neighbor and level dependency,” International Journal of Wavelets, Multiresolution and Information Processing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 299–311, 2009.
[8]  J. E. Fowler, “The redundant discrete wavelet transform and additive noise,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 629–632, 2005.
[9]  J.-L. Starck, J. Fadili, and F. Murtagh, “The undecimated wavelet decomposition and its reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 297–309, 2007.
[10]  X.-Y. Wang, H.-Y. Yang, and Z.-K. Fu, “A new wavelet-based image denoising using undecimated discrete wavelet transform and least squares support vector machine,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 7040–7049, 2010.
[11]  A. Mencattini, G. Rabottino, M. Salmeri, R. Lojacono, and B. Sciunzi, “Denoising and enhancement of mammographic images under the assumption of heteroscedastic additive noise by an optimal subband thresholding,” International Journal of Wavelets, Multiresolution and Information Processing, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 713–741, 2010.
[12]  P. Zhao, Z. Shang, and C. Zhao, “Image denoising based on Gaussian and non-Gaussian assumption,” International Journal of Wavelets, Multiresolution and Information Processing, vol. 10, no. 2, Article ID 1250014, 2012.
[13]  Z. Huang, B. Fang, X. He, and L. Xia, “Image denoising based on the dyadic wavelet transform and improved threshold,” International Journal of Wavelets, Multiresolution and Information Processing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 269–280, 2009.
[14]  E. Matsuyama, D.-Y. Tsai, Y. Lee, et al., “A modified undecimated discrete wavelet transform based approach to mammographic image denoising,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 26, pp. 748–758, 2013.
[15]  W. Kim, J. You, and J. Jeong, “Contrast enhancement using histogram equalization based on logarithmic mapping,” Optical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 6, Article ID 067002, 2012.
[16]  A. Papadopoulos, D. I. Fotiadis, and L. Costaridou, “Improvement of microcalcification cluster detection in mammography utilizing image enhancement techniques,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1045–1055, 2008.
[17]  R. M. Rangayyan, L. Shen, Y. Shen et al., “Improvement of sensitivity of breast cancer diagnosis with adaptive neighborhood contrast enhancement of mammograms,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 161–170, 1997.
[18]  J. Jiang, B. Yao, and A. M. Wason, “Integration of fuzzy logic and structure tensor towards mammogram contrast enhancement,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 2005.
[19]  S. Hashemi, S. Kiani, N. Noroozi, and M. E. Moghaddam, “An image contrast enhancement method based on genetic algorithm,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 1816–1824, 2010.
[20]  D.-Y. Tsai, Y. Lee, and R. Chiba, “An improved adaptive neighborhood contrast enhancement method for medical images,” in Proceedings of the 3rd IASTED International Conference on Medical Engineering, pp. 59–63, February 2005.
[21]  R. N. Strickland and H. Hahn, “Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 218–229, 1996.
[22]  D.-Y. Tsai, Y. Lee, and S. Sakaguchi, “A preliminary study of wavelet-coefficient transfer curves for the edge enhancement of medical images,” Transactions of the Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 86–90, 2002.
[23]  D.-Y. Tsai and Y. Lee, “A method of medical image enhancement using wavelet-coefficient mapping functions,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Networks and Signal Processing (ICNNSP '03), pp. 1091–1094, December 2003.
[24]  P. Heinlein, J. Drexl, and W. Schneider, “Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 402–413, 2003.
[25]  Y. Lee, D. -Y. Tsai, and T. Suzuki, “Contrast enhancement of medical images using sigmoid-type transfer curves for wavelet coefficient weighting adjustment,” Medical Imaging and Information Science, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 48–53, 2008.
[26]  E. Matsuyama, D. Y. Tsai, Y. Lee, and N. Takahashi, “Comparison of a discrete wavelet transform method and a modified undecimated discrete wavelet transform method for denoising of mammograms,” in Proceedings of 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, pp. 3403–3406, 2013.
[27]  Mammographic Image Analysis Society, http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/info/mias.html.
[28]  Japanese Society of Radiological Technology, 2012, http://www.jsrt.or.jp/jsrt-db/eng.php.
[29]  H. Scheffe, The Analysis of Variance, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1959.
[30]  G. C. Canavos and J. A. Koutrouvelis, An Introduction to the Design & Analysis of Experiments, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.
[31]  P. Bao and L. Zhang, “Noise reduction for magnetic resonance images via adaptive multiscale products thresholding,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1089–1099, 2003.
[32]  G. Cincotti, G. Loi, and M. Pappalardo, “Frequency decomposition and compounding of ultrasound medical images with wavelet packets,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 764–771, 2001.
[33]  Y.-P. Wang, Q. Wu, K. R. Castleman, and Z. Xiong, “Chromosome image enhancement using multiscale differential operators,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 685–693, 2003.
[34]  F. Luisier, T. Blu, and M. Unser, “A new SURE approach to image denoising: interscale orthonormal wavelet thresholding,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 593–606, 2007.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413