全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Modulation in Ocean Primary Production due to Variability of Photosynthetically Available Radiation under Different Atmospheric Conditions

DOI: 10.1155/2014/279412

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The rate of photosynthesis primarily depends on nutrients and photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) at sea surface. Several ship cruises were carried out to measure optical, biological, and atmospheric parameters in the Arabian Sea and their variability were studied. An analytical nonspectral photosynthesis-irradiance model was used to estimate euphotic primary production (EuPP) to study its variability during cruise periods. PAR was estimated using COART model using in situ measured aerosol optical depth (AOD) to compare with in situ measured PAR. In order to understand the variability of PAR under different types of aerosol and different aerosol loading, a simulation study was carried out using COART model. EuPP was estimated for various PAR values under different aerosol loading and cloud coverage conditions. Sensitivity analysis showed that for maritime, maritime polluted, and desert aerosols, the ratio PAR/PAR0AOD has attenuated to about 11–25%, whereas it has attenuated to 44% for urban aerosol type. PAR/PARclear??sky was reduced by ~57% for high aerosol loading and for overcast sky. The decrease in EuPP under various aerosol loading and cloud coverage was observed to depend on the photoadaptation parameter. EuPP/EuPPclear??sky was reduced by 38% for maximum maritime aerosol loading and for overcast sky. 1. Introduction Biological process in the ocean is mediated through the process of photosynthesis, where marine phytoplankton converts inorganic carbon to organic carbon and removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The rate, at which photosynthesis occurs, also termed as primary production, primarily depends on nutrients and photosynthetically available radiation, or PAR, (~0.4–0.7?μm wavelengths) at sea surface. Productivity varies with the availability of light and takes place within the euphotic zone. This extends from the surface to a depth where there is 1% of the light intensity from the surface. The photosynthetic response of phytoplankton to available light is not linear. It is light dependent at the lower light intensities and becomes independent (saturated) at higher light intensities, producing a curve which is described by its slope ( ) and the maximum photosynthesis ( ) [1]. As solar radiation passes through the earth’s atmosphere, some of it gets absorbed or scattered by different atmospheric constituents like aerosols, cloud cover, ozone, water vapor, and various gasses. On a daily level, cloudiness and aerosols have a significant influence on the amount of radiation that reaches the earth surface [2–4]. Arabian Sea and

References

[1]  T. Platt and S. Sathyendranath, “Estimators of primary production for interpretation of remotely sensed data on ocean color,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 14–576, 1993.
[2]  M. Runnstr?m, S. Brogaard, and L. Olsson, “Estimation of PAR over Northern China from daily NOAA AVHRR cloud cover classifications,” Geocarto International, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2006.
[3]  S. Sarkar, R. Chokngamwong, G. Cervone, R. P. Singh, and M. Kafatos, “Variability of aerosol optical depth and aerosol forcing over India,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 2153–2159, 2006.
[4]  M. Hess, P. Koepke, and I. Schult, “Optical properties of aerosols and clouds: the software package OPAC,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 831–844, 1998.
[5]  S. K. Nair, K. Parameswaran, and K. Rajeev, “Seven year satellite observations of the mean structures and variabilities in the regional aerosol distribution over the oceanic areas around the Indian subcontinent,” Annales Geophysicae, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2011–2030, 2005.
[6]  S. Bonnet and C. Guieu, “Dissolution of atmospheric iron in seawater,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 31, no. 3, 2004.
[7]  R. A. Cropp, A. J. Gabric, G. H. McTainsh, R. D. Braddock, and N. Tindale, “Coupling between ocean biota and atmospheric aerosols: dust, dimethylsulphide, or artifact?” Global Biogeochemical Cycles, vol. 19, no. 4, 2005.
[8]  M. Chami, M. Mallet, and B. Gentili, “Quantitative analysis of the influence of dust sea surface forcing on the primary production of the subtropical Atlantic Ocean using a ten-year time series of satellite observations,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 117, no. C07008, pp. 1–14, 2012.
[9]  M. Mallet, M. Chami, B. Gentili, R. Sempéré, and P. Dubuisson, “Impact of sea-surface dust radiative forcing on the oceanic primary production: a ID modeling approach applied to the west african coastal waters,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, no. 15, Article ID L15828, 2009.
[10]  R. Jyothibabu, P. A. Maheswaran, N. V. Madhu et al., “Differential response of winter cooling on biological production in the northeastern Arabian Sea and northwestern Bay of Bengal,” Current Science, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 783–791, 2004.
[11]  S. P. Kumar and T. G. Prasad, “Winter cooling in the northern Arabian Sea,” Current Science, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 834–841, 1996.
[12]  H. M. Woolf, “On the computation of solar elevation angles and the determination of sunrise and sunset times,” Tech. Rep. NASA TM X-1646, 1968.
[13]  D. G. Dye, “Spectral composition and quanta-to-energy ratio of diffuse photosynthetically active radiation under diverse cloud conditions,” Journal of Geophysical Research D, vol. 109, no. D10, 2004.
[14]  K. J. Moon, J. Kim, H. K. Cho, J. Lee, S. Y. Hong, and M. J. Jeong, “Effect of aerosol optical depth on diffuse photosynthetically active solar irradiance,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 307–317, 2009.
[15]  A. G. Dickson and C. Goyet, Eds., Handbook of Methods for the Analysis of the Various Parameters of the Cxbon Dioxide System in Seawater, ORNUCDIAC-74.
[16]  A. D. Jassby and T. Platt, “Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton,” Limnology and Oceanography, vol. 21, pp. 540–546, 1976.
[17]  T. D. Brock, “Calculating solar radiation for ecological studies,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 1–19, 1981.
[18]  J. P. Lestrade, B. Acock, and T. Trent, “The effect of cloud layer plane albedo on global and diffuse insolation,” Solar Energy, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 115–121, 1990.
[19]  Z. Jin and K. Stamnes, “Radiative transfer in nonuniformly refracting layered media: atmosphere-ocean system,” Applied Optics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 431–442, 1994.
[20]  Z. Jin, T. P. Charlock, K. Rutledge, K. Stamnes, and Y. Wang, “Analytical solution of radiative transfer in the coupled atmosphere-ocean system with a rough surface,” Applied Optics, vol. 45, no. 28, pp. 7443–7455, 2006.
[21]  P. Viriyathananont, B. Thanaand, and A. Chabangborn, “Effect of aerosol on photosynthetically active radiation,” BEST, vol. 2, no. 1-2, pp. 71–72, 2009.
[22]  S. P. Kumar, J. Narvekar, M. Nuncio et al., “Is the biological productivity in the Bay of Bengal light limited?” Current Science, vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 1331–1339, 2010.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133