全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Natural Killer Cells and Their Activation Status in Normal Pregnancy

DOI: 10.1155/2013/906813

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Increased peripheral blood-activated NK cell counts are associated with increased risk of miscarriage and failed in vitro fertilization treatment. However, assessment of activated peripheral NK cells in normal and pathological pregnancies beyond implantation and early miscarriage has not been described. Total CD69 expressing NK cells counts were measured by flow cytometry in healthy women with singleton pregnancies, including 45 at 11+6–13+6 weeks’ gestation, 46 at 20+0–22+4 weeks, and 42 at 31+6–33+5 weeks. The number of peripheral blood NK cells decreased, whereas the percentage of activated CD69 expressing NK cells increased from the first to the third trimester of pregnancy. This study shows the course of peripheral blood NK cells and activated CD69 expressing NK cells in uncomplicated nulliparous singleton pregnancies. This is a first step in understanding their implication in pathological pregnancies. 1. Introduction It is now accepted that for a normal pregnancy to occur, the maternal immune system must be rendered more tolerant towards the semiallogeneic fetus. The required changes must ultimately result in controlled modulation of the uterine natural killer (uNK) cells that represent the most abundant cell population at the fetomaternal interface. These cells play a critical role in implantation and particularly in vascular remodelling and trophoblast invasion [1, 2]. As such NK cells have a critical role in the healthy progression of the pregnancy by maintaining the balance between placental function and fetal requirements. NK cells are also found in the peripheral blood and like uNK cells, these may be recognized by the expression of cell surface markers. They are usually CD3 negative, but express CD16 and CD56. NK cells are subdivided, by the intensity of expression of CD56, into a + and + . Peripheral blood NK (pNK) cells are predominantly + , whereas uNK cells are predominantly + [3, 4]. The exact relationship between these two sub-groups of NK cells is unclear but it has been suggested that uNK migrates from the systemic vascular system [5, 6]. Importantly, however, the factors that regulate uterine and peripheral blood NK cells are likely similar. Thus assessing the level of activation of the peripheral blood NK cells gives information of the state of the uterine cells [7]. CD69 is one of the earliest specific markers of NK cell activation [8–10]. Activated NK cells release cytokines that activate other NK cells and the cellular immune system generally [10]. Elevated NK cell CD69 expression is associated with increased cytotoxicity and

References

[1]  J. N. Bulmer and G. E. Lash, “Human uterine natural killer cells: a reappraisal,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 511–521, 2005.
[2]  A. Moffett-King, “Natural killer cells and pregnancy,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 656–663, 2002.
[3]  M. A. Cooper, T. A. Fehniger, and M. A. Caligiuri, “The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 633–640, 2001.
[4]  S. Yagel, “The developmental role of natural killer cells at the fetal-maternal interface,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 201, no. 4, pp. 344–350, 2009.
[5]  C. Dosiou and L. C. Giudice, “Natural killer cells in pregnancy and recurrent pregnancy loss: endocrine and immunologic perspectives,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 44–62, 2005.
[6]  M. J. Van den Heuvel, K. Hatta, C. G. Peralta, V. K. Han, and D. A. Clark, “CD56+ cells are recruited to the uterus in two waves: at ovulation and during the first 2 weeks after missed menses,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 90–98, 2008.
[7]  A. S. Bansal, “Joining the immunological dots in recurrent miscarriage,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 307–315, 2010.
[8]  R. Craston, M. Koh, A. McDermott, N. Ray, H. G. Prentice, and M. W. Lowdell, “Temporal dynamics of CD69 expression on lymphoid cells,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 1997.
[9]  A. S. Llera, F. Viedma, F. Sánchez-Madrid, and J. Tormo, “Crystal structure of the C-type lectin-like domain from the human hematopoietic cell receptor CD69,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 10, pp. 7312–7319, 2001.
[10]  R. Marzio, J. Mau?l, and S. Betz-Corradin, “CD69 and regulation of the immune function,” Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 565–582, 1999.
[11]  R. De Maria, M. G. Cifone, R. Trotta et al., “Triggering of human monocyte activation through CD69, a member of the natural killer cell gene complex family of signal transducing receptors,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 1999–2004, 1994.
[12]  L. L. Lanier, D. W. Buck, L. Rhodes et al., “Interleukin 2 activation of natural killer cells rapidly induces the expression and phosphorylation of the Leu-23 activation antigen,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 167, no. 5, pp. 1572–1585, 1988.
[13]  H. N. Ho, K. H. Chao, C. K. Chen, Y. S. Yang, and S. C. Huang, “Activation status of T and NK cells in the endometrium throughout menstrual cycle and normal and abnormal early pregnancy,” Human Immunology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 130–136, 1996.
[14]  T. Avril, S. Iochmann, D. Brand, P. Bardos, H. Watier, and G. Thibault, “Human choriocarcinoma cell resistance to natural killer lysis due to defective triggering of natural killer cells,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 627–633, 2003.
[15]  C. Helige, G. Hagendorfer, J. Smolle, and G. Dohr, “Uterine natural killer cells in a three-dimensional tissue culture model to study trophoblast invasion,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 1153–1162, 2001.
[16]  C. B. Coulam and R. G. Roussev, “Correlation of NK cell activation and inhibition markers with NK cytoxicity among women experiencing immunologic implantation failure after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 58–62, 2003.
[17]  G. Sacks, Y. Yang, E. Gowen, S. Smith, L. Fay, and M. Chapman, “Detailed analysis of peripheral blood natural killer cells in women with repeated IVF failure,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 67, pp. 434–442, 2012.
[18]  M. Y. Thum, S. Bhaskaran, H. I. Abdalla et al., “An increase in the absolute count of CD16+CD69+ NK cells in the peripheral blood is associated with a poorer IVF treatment and pregnancy outcome,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 2395–2400, 2004.
[19]  J. H. Yoo, J. Kwak-Kim, A. R. Han, et al., “Peripheral blood NK cell cytotoxicities are negatively correlated with CD8+ T cells in fertile women but not in women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 38–46, 2012.
[20]  E. E. Winger, J. L. Reed, S. Ashoush, T. El-Toukhy, S. Ahuja, and M. Taranissi, “Elevated preconception CD56+ 16+ and/or Th1:Th2 levels predict benefit from IVIG therapy in subfertile women undergoing IVF,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 394–403, 2011.
[21]  H. Valdimarsson, C. Mulholland, V. Fridriksdottir, and D. V. Coleman, “A longitudinal study of leucocyte blood counts and lymphocyte responses in pregnancy: a marked early increase of monocyte-lymphocyte ratio,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 437–443, 1983.
[22]  S. Lurie, E. Rahamim, I. Piper, A. Golan, and O. Sadan, “Total and differential leukocyte counts percentiles in normal pregnancy,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 16–19, 2008.
[23]  M. Kühnert, R. Strohmeier, M. Stegmüller, and E. Halberstadt, “Changes in lymphocyte subsets during normal pregnancy,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 76, pp. 147–151, 1998.
[24]  F. Mahmoud, H. Abul, A. Omu, S. Al-Rayes, D. Haines, and K. Whaley, “Pregnancy-associated changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in normal Kuwaiti women,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 232–236, 2001.
[25]  A. L. Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven, A. Bouman, H. Moes et al., “Cytokine production in natural killer cells and lymphocytes in pregnant women compared with women in the follicular phase of the ovarian cycle,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 1032–1037, 2002.
[26]  G. E. Lash and J. N. Bulmer, “Do uterine natural killer (uNK) cells contribute to female reproductive disorders?” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 156–164, 2011.
[27]  A. E. Beer, J. Y. H. Kwak, and J. E. Ruiz, “Immunophenotypic profiles of peripheral blood lymphocytes in women with recurrent pregnancy losses and in infertile women with multiple failed in vitro fertilization cycles,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 376–382, 1996.
[28]  M. Y. Thum, S. Bhaskaran, A. S. Bansal et al., “Simple enumerations of peripheral blood natural killer (CD56+ NK) cells, B cells and T cells have no predictive value in IVF treatment outcome,” Human Reproduction, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1272–1276, 2005.
[29]  D. W. Park, H. J. Lee, C. W. Park, S. R. Hong, J. Kwak-Kim, and K. M. Yang, “Peripheral blood NK cells reflect changes in decidual NK cells in women with recurrent miscarriages,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 173–180, 2010.
[30]  M. Yokota, A. Fukui, A. Funamizu, et al., “Role of NKp46 expression in cytokine production by CD56-positive NK cells in the peripheral blood and the uterine endometrium,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 202–211, 2013.
[31]  A. Van der Meer, H. G. M. Lukassen, B. van Cranenbroek et al., “Soluble HLA-G promotes Th1-type cytokine production by cytokine-activated uterine and peripheral natural killer cells,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 123–133, 2007.
[32]  A. Fukui, A. Funamizu, M. Yokota, et al., “Uterine and circulating natural killer cells and their roles in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, implantation failure and preeclampsia,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 105–110, 2011.
[33]  G. P. Sacks, K. Studena, I. L. Sargent, and C. W. G. Redman, “Normal pregnancy and preeclampsia both produce inflammatory changes in peripheral blood leukocytes akin to those of sepsis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 1998.
[34]  I. L. Sargent, S. J. Germain, G. P. Sacks, S. Kumar, and C. W. G. Redman, “Trophoblast deportation and the maternal inflammatory response in pre-eclampsia,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2003.
[35]  I. L. Sargent, A. M. Borzychowski, and C. W. G. Redman, “NK cells and human pregnancy—an inflammatory view,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 399–404, 2006.
[36]  J. R. Prins, N. Gomez-Lopez, and S. A. Robertson, “Interleukin-6 in pregnancy and gestational disorders,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 95, no. 1-2, pp. 1–14, 2012.
[37]  I. Granne, J. H. Southcombe, J. V. Snider, et al., “ST2 and IL-33 in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e24463, 1 pages, 2011.
[38]  M. Milovanovic, V. Volarevic, G. Radosavljevic, I. Jovanovic, N. Pejnovic, and N. Arsenijevic, “Lukic ML. IL-33/ST2 axis in inflammation and immunopathology,” Immunologic Research, vol. 52, no. 1-2, pp. 89–99, 2012.
[39]  P. Ozanne, O. Linderkamp, F. C. Miller, and H. J. Meiselman, “Erythrocyte aggregation during normal pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 576–583, 1983.
[40]  A. H. Picklesimer, H. L. Jared, K. Moss, S. Offenbacher, J. D. Beck, and K. A. Boggess, “Racial differences in C-reactive protein levels during normal pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 199, no. 5, pp. 523.e1–523.e6, 2008.
[41]  A. S. Bansal, S. Bora, S. Saso, J. R. Smith, M. R. Johnson, and M. Y. Thum, “The mechanism of human chorionic gonadotrophin mediated immunomodulation in pregnancy,” Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 747–753, 2012.
[42]  L. A. Cole, “Biological functions of hCG and hCG-related molecules,” Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, vol. 8, article 102, 2010.
[43]  W. Norris, T. Nevers, S. Sharma, and S. Kalkunte, “Review: HCG, preeclampsia and regulatory T cells,” Placenta, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. S182–S185, 2011.
[44]  M. Tsampalas, V. Gridelet, S. Berndt, J. M. Foidart, V. Geenen, and S. P. d'Hauterive, “Human chorionic gonadotropin: a hormone with immunological and angiogenic properties,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 93–98, 2010.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413