全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Is Repeat PTA of a Failing Hemodialysis Fistula Durable?

DOI: 10.1155/2014/369687

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Purpose. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and particularly rePTA in a failing arteriovenous fistula (AV-fistula). Are multiple redilations worthwhile? Patients and Methods. All 159 stenoses of AV fistulas that were treated with PTA, with or without stenting, during 2008 and 2009, were included. Occluded fistulas that were dilated after successful thrombolysis were also included. Median age was 68 (interquartile range 61.5–78.5) years and 75% were male. Results. Seventy-nine (50%) of the primary PTAs required no further reintervention. The primary patency was 61% at 6 months and 42% at 12 months. Eighty (50%) of the stenoses needed at least one reintervention. Primary assisted patency (defined as patency after subsequent reinterventions) was 89% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months. The durability of repeated PTAs was similar to the durability of the primary PTA. However, an early primary PTA carried a higher risk for subsequent reinterventions. Successful dialysis was achieved after 98% of treatments. Nine percent of the stenoses eventually required surgical revision and 13% of the fistulas failed permanently. Conclusion. The present study suggests that most failing AV-fistulas can be salvaged endovascularly. Repeated PTA seems similarly durable as the primary PTA. 1. Introduction The number of dialysis patients with end-stage renal failure increases by more than 4% per year in Sweden, with a current prevalence of 900 dialysis patients per million inhabitants [1]. These patients are always concerned about the function of their vascular access because their quality of life depends on it. Fistulas often stenose and may become dysfunctional. Stenoses necessitate reinterventions or creation of a “de novo” fistula. The number of possible access sites is limited. PTA has become the treatment of choice for stenoses in AV fistulas, as it is less invasive than open surgery. The reduced need for surgical reinterventions and new fistulas seems to be a direct consequence of this strategy (Figure 1). Figure 1: Number of PTAs and surgical operations in hemodialysis fistulas per year at our institution. The aim of the present study is to assess the durability of PTA in AV fistulas in a center that predominantly uses this technique for salvage of failing fistulas and particularly to evaluate the efficacy of multiple rePTAs: is it worthwhile to dilate a fistula multiple times? 2. Patients and Methods Data from all 106 patients treated with a primary PTA of an AV fistula between January 2008 and December 2009 were

References

[1]  Svenskt Njurregister (SNR), “Aktiv uremiv?rd i Sverige1991–2009,” http://www.medscinet.net/snr/rapporter.aspx.
[2]  O. Dapunt, M. Feurstein, K. H. Rendl, and K. Prenner, “Transluminal angioplasty versus conventional operation in the treatment of haemodialysis fistula stenosis: results from a 5-year study,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 1004–1005, 1987.
[3]  A. Hingorani, E. Ascher, S. Kallakuri, S. Greenberg, and Y. Khanimov, “Impact of reintervention for failing upper-extremity arteriovenous autogenous access for hemodialysis,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1004–1009, 2001.
[4]  N. Tessitore, G. Mansueto, G. Lipari et al., “Endovascular versus surgical preemptive repair of forearm arteriovenous fistula juxta-anastomotic stenosis: analysis of data collected prospectively from 1999 to 2004,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 448–454, 2006.
[5]  K. G. Ljungstr?m, T. Troeng, and M. Bj?rck, “Time-trends in vascular access surgery in Sweden,” European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 592–596, 2008.
[6]  M. Napoli, R. Prudenzano, F. Russo, A. L. Antonaci, M. Aprile, and E. Buongiorno, “Juxta-anastomotic stenosis of native arteriovenous fistulas: surgical treatment versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty,” The Journal of Vascular Access, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 346–351, 2010.
[7]  R. P. Campos, M. M. Do Nascimento, D. C. Chula, D. E. Do Nascimento, and M. C. Riella, “Stenosis in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula: evaluation and treatment,” Hemodialysis International, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 152–161, 2006.
[8]  NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access, “Dialysis outcomes quality initiative,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 30, no. 4, supplement 3, pp. 150–191, 1997.
[9]  L. Turmel-Rodrigues, J. Pengloan, and P. Bourquelot, “Interventional radiology in hemodialysis fistulae and grafts: a multidisciplinary approach,” CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2002.
[10]  M. ?urlan and P. Popovi?, “The role of interventional radiology in management of patients with end-stage renal disease,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 96–114, 2003.
[11]  P. Haage and R. W. Günther, “Radiological intervention to maintain vascular access,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 84–89, 2006.
[12]  D. G. Miquelin, L. F. Reis, A. A. da Silva, et al., “Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of stenosis of arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis,” International Archives of Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, article 16, 2008.
[13]  J. I. Greenberg, A. Suliman, and N. Angle, “Endovascular Dialysis Interventions in the Era of DOQI,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 657–662, 2008.
[14]  H. Flu, P. J. Breslau, J. M. K.-V. Straaten, J. F. Hamming, and J.-W. H. Lardenoye, “The effect of implementation of an optimized care protocol on the outcome of arteriovenous hemodialysis access surgery,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 659–668, 2008.
[15]  M. A. Hansen, K. Gibsholm-Madsen, T. Christensen, et al., “Endovascular treatment of dysfunctional haemodialysis fistulas,” Ugeskr Laeger, vol. 171, no. 1-2, pp. 41–45, 2009.
[16]  A. Cohen, A. Korzets, H. Neyman et al., “Endovascular interventions of juxtaanastomotic stenoses and thromboses of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 66–70, 2009.
[17]  D. Patanè, W. Morale, P. Malfa et al., “Steno-obstructions of haemodialytic FAV: new aspects of endovascular treatments,” Giornale Italiano di Nefrologia, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 236–245, 2009.
[18]  W. S. Kim, W. B. Pyun, and B. C. Kang, “The primary patency of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in hemodialysis patients with vascular access failure,” Korean Circulation Journal, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 512–517, 2011.
[19]  N. Ayez, B. Fioole, R. A. Aarts et al., “Secondary interventions in patients with autologous arteriovenous fistulas strongly improve patency rates,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1095–1099, 2011.
[20]  N. Toya, T. Fujita, H. Hagiwara et al., “Periodic duplex ultrasonography screening together with elective percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the management of graft arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis,” Surgery Today, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 775–778, 2006.
[21]  L. Turmel-Rodrigues, J. Pengloan, S. Baudin et al., “Treatment of stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis fistulas and grafts by interventional radiology,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 2029–2036, 2000.
[22]  L. Turmel-Rodrigues, A. Mouton, B. Birmelé et al., “Salvage of immature forearm fistulas for haemodialysis by interventional radiology,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2365–2371, 2001.
[23]  S. Heye, G. Maleux, J. Vaninbroukx, K. Claes, D. Kuypers, and R. Oyen, “Factors influencing technical success and outcome of percutaneous balloon angioplasty in de novo native hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 2298–2303, 2012.
[24]  F. Caeiro, D. Carvalho, J. Cruz, et al., “Efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on dysfunctional fistulae because of inflow stenosis,” The Journal of Vascular Access, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 231–238, 2013.
[25]  H. I. Manninen, E. T. Kaukanen, R. Ik?heimo et al., “Brachial arterial access: endovascular treatment of failing Brescia-Cimino hemodialysis fistulas—initial success and long-term results,” Radiology, vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 711–718, 2001.
[26]  C. J. Davidson, G. E. Newman, K. H. Sheikh, K. Kisslo, R. S. Stack, and S. J. Schwab, “Mechanisms of angioplasty in hemodialysis fistula stenoses evaluated by intravascular ultrasound,” Kidney International, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 91–95, 1991.
[27]  T. Higuchi, N. Okuda, K. Aoki et al., “Intravascular ultrasound imaging before and after angioplasty for stenosis of arteriovenous fistulae in haemodialysis patients,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 151–155, 2001.
[28]  P. Roy-Chaudhury, V. P. Sukhatme, and A. K. Cheung, “Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: a cellular and molecular viewpoint,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1112–1127, 2006.
[29]  C.-J. Chang, P.-J. Ko, L.-A. Hsu et al., “Highly increased cell proliferation activity in the restenotic hemodialysis vascular access after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: implication in prevention of restenosis,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 74–84, 2004.
[30]  A. C. Raynaud, C. Y. Angel, M. R. Sapoval, B. Beyssen, J.-Y. Pagny, and M. Auguste, “Treatment of hemodialysis access rupture during PTA with Wallstent implantation,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 437–442, 1998.
[31]  J. A. Bittl, “Venous rupture during percutaneous treatment of hemodialysis fistulas and grafts,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 1097–1101, 2009.
[32]  N. Tessitore, G. Mansueto, V. Bedogna et al., “A prospective controlled trial on effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on functioning arteriovenous fistulae survival,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1623–1627, 2003.
[33]  L. A. Scaffaro, J. A. Bettio, S. A. Cavazzola et al., “Maintenance of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas by an interventional strategy: clinical and duplex ultrasonographic surveillance followed by transluminal angioplasty,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1159–1165, 2009.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133