全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A BDDC Preconditioner for the Rotated FEM for Elliptic Problems with Discontinuous Coefficients

DOI: 10.1155/2014/859424

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We propose a BDDC preconditioner for the rotated finite element method for second order elliptic equations with piecewise but discontinuous coefficients. In the framework of the standard additive Schwarz methods, we describe this method by a complete variational form. We show that our method has a quasioptimal convergence behavior; that is, the condition number of the preconditioned problem is independent of the jumps of the coefficients and depends only logarithmically on the ratio between the subdomain size and the mesh size. Numerical experiments are presented to confirm our theoretical analysis. 1. Introduction The balancing domain decomposition by constraints (BDDC) method was first introduced by Dohrmann in [1]. Then Mandel and the author Dohrmann restated the method in an abstract manner and provided its convergence theory in [2]. The BDDC method is closely related to the dual-primal FETI (FETI-DP) method [3], which is one of dual iterative substructuring methods. Each BDDC and FETI-DP method is defined in terms of a set of primal continuity; the primal continuity is enforced across the interface between the subdomains and provides a coarse space component of the preconditioner. In [4], Mandel et al. analyzed the relation between the two methods and established the corresponding theory. In the last decades, the two methods have been widely analyzed and successfully been extended to many different types of partial differential equations. In [3], the two algorithms for elliptic problems were rederived and a brief proof of the main result was given. A BDDC algorithm for mortar finite element was developed in [5]; meanwhile, the authors also extended the FETI-DP algorithm to elasticity problems and stokes problems in [6, 7], respectively. These algorithms were based on locally conforming finite element methods, and the coarse space components of the algorithms were related to the cross-points (i.e., corners), which are often noteworthy points in domain decomposition methods (DDMs). Since the cross-points are related to more than two subregions, thus it is not convenient when designing algorithm. The BDDC method derives from the Neumann-Neumann domain decomposition method (see [8]). The difference is that the BDDC method applies an additive rather than a multiplicative coarse grid correction, and substructure spaces have some constraints which result in nonsingular subproblems, so that we can solve each subproblem and coarse problem in parallel. The rotated element is an important nonconforming element. It was introduced by Rannacher and Turek in [9]

References

[1]  C. R. Dohrmann, “A preconditioner for substructuring based on constrained energy minimization,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 246–258, 2003.
[2]  J. Mandel and C. R. Dohrmann, “Convergence of a balancing domain decomposition by constraints and energy minimization,” Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 639–659, 2003.
[3]  J. Li and O. B. Widlund, “FETI-DP, BDDC, and block Cholesky methods,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 250–271, 2006.
[4]  J. Mandel, C. R. Dohrmann, and R. Tezaur, “An algebraic theory for primal and dual substructuring methods by constraints,” Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 167–193, 2005.
[5]  H. H. Kim, “A BDDC algorithm for mortar discretization of elasticity problems,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 2090–2111, 2008.
[6]  H. H. Kim, “A FETI-DP formulation of three dimensional elasticity problems with mortar discretization,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 2346–2370, 2008.
[7]  H. H. Kim, C.-O. Lee, and E.-H. Park, “A FETI-DP formulation for the Stokes problem without primal pressure components,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 4142–4162, 2010.
[8]  P. le Tallec, J. Mandel, and M. Vidrascu, “A Neumann-Neumann domain decomposition algorithm for solving plate and shell problems,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 836–867, 1998.
[9]  R. Rannacher and S. Turek, “Simple nonconforming quadrilateral Stokes element,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 97–111, 1992.
[10]  J. Xu, “Iterative methods by space decomposition and subspace correction,” SIAM Review A, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 581–613, 1992.
[11]  J. Xu and J. Zou, “Some nonoverlapping domain decomposition methods,” SIAM Review, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 857–914, 1998.
[12]  J.-r. Chen and X.-j. Xu, “The mortar element method for rotated Q1 element,” Journal of Computational Mathematics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 313–324, 2002.
[13]  A. Toselli and O. Widlund, Domain Decomposition Methods: Algorithms and Theory, vol. 34, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005.
[14]  F. Wang, J. Chen, W. Xu, and Z. Li, “An additive Schwarz preconditioner for the mortar-type rotated FEM for elliptic problems with discontinuous coefficients,” Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 1657–1667, 2009.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133