Education and training in anaesthesia have traditionally focused on the preparation and delivery of intraoperative anaesthesia but are evolving to incorporate aspects of perioperative medical care. The expansion of continued professional development and postgraduate courses in this field has gathered pace, with the aim of teaching anaesthetists and allied professionals to improve patients' surgical care. We surveyed a population of UK-based anaesthetists to establish their views on professional development within perioperative medicine, their role as perioperative medical experts of the future, and the training and educational needs of this cohort. The majority of anaesthetists acknowledged their evolving role in perioperative patient care and recognised a need to train for the task. Only 50% of the senior anaesthetists surveyed believed they had sufficient knowledge and skills to undertake perioperative care with the majority believing the current training curriculum must advance to support professional development. In line with other international healthcare systems, UK-based anaesthetic practice is adopting a responsibility for perioperative medical practice, and this survey has demonstrated willingness amongst anaesthetists of all grades to embrace change, recognise training needs, and improve the outcome for surgical patients. 1. Introduction A growing proportion of patients undergoing surgery are elderly and increasingly have coexistent disease, which may influence outcome [1, 2]. As surgical programmes develop to meet the needs of this population, it is now commonplace to see this cohort undergo major surgical interventions, which expose them to a high possibility of perioperative morbidity and mortality [3]. Such patients are often cared for within resource-limited healthcare systems, whose continued remits are to drive efficiency and streamline clinical episodes and may be at odds with best care for those patients considered to be at highest risk. This so-called high-risk patient population represents approximately 15% of the total surgical population and yet as a group contributes to 80% of perioperative mortality [4]. Current models of care, involving surgical teams working without the support of multidisciplinary input, have been challenged and led to calls from within the profession to develop broad-based perioperative medicine expertise, which better supports complex patient episodes. Perioperative medicine is defined as “the continuum of patient care involving preoperative evaluation and preparation, preanaesthetic assessment,
References
[1]
L. A. Anderson, R. A. Goodman, D. Holtzman, S. F. Posner, and M. E. Northridge, “Aging in the United States: opportunities and challenges for public health,” The American Journal of Public Health, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 393–395, 2012.
[2]
R. Beaglehole, S. Ebrahim, S. Reddy, J. Vo？te, and S. Leeder, “Prevention of chronic diseases: a call to action,” The Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9605, pp. 2152–2157, 2007.
[3]
R. M. Pearse, D. A. Harrison, P. James et al., “Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom,” Critical Care, vol. 10, no. 3, article R81, 2006.
[4]
D. A. Story, K. Leslie, P. S. Myles et al., “Complications and mortality in older surgical patients in Australia and New Zealand (the REASON study): a multicentre, prospective, observational study,” Anaesthesia, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1022–1030, 2010.
[5]
V. Beavis, “Anaesthetists as perioperative physicians,” in Proceedings of the Australian Society of Anaesthetists National Scientific Conference, 2012.
[6]
S. Ingram, “The Royal College of Anaesthetists,” Bulletin, vol. 1, pp. 9–11, 2002.
[7]
J. van Besouw, “The Royal College of Anaesthetists,” Bulletin, vol. 82, pp. 4–5, 2013.
[8]
C. Beattie, “Training perioperative physicians,” Anesthesiology Clinics of North America, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 515–525, 2000.
[9]
R. M. Pearse, R. P. Moreno, P. Bauer et al., “Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study.,” The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9847, pp. 1059–1065, 2012.
[10]
Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, “Perioperative Medicine Taskforce Report,” 2005.
[11]
L. J. Saidman, “The 33rd Rovenstine Lecture: what I have learned from 9 years and 9,000 papers,” Anesthesiology, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 191–197, 1995.
[12]
A. O. Adesanya and G. P. Joshi, “Hospitalists and anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians: are their roles complementary?” Proceedings, vol. 20, no. 2, article 140, 2007.
[13]
C. S. Deutschman and K. B. Traber, “Evolution of anesthesiology,” Anesthesiology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 1996.
[14]
M. A. Warner, S. E. Shields, and C. G. Chute, “Major morbidity and mortality within 1 month of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 270, no. 12, pp. 1437–1441, 1993.
[15]
R. S. Lagasse, “Anesthesia safety: model or myth? A review of the published literature and analysis of current original data,” Anesthesiology, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1609–1617, 2002.
[16]
P. J. Nkansah, D. A. Haas, and M. A. Saso, “Mortality incidence in outpatient anesthesia for dentistry in Ontario,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 646–651, 1997.
M. Sajeva and V. Lanza, “Open Source Web based solutions for lifelong learning,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference NETTIES, Editura Politehnica, Timisoara, Romania, 2006.
[19]
M. P. W. Grocott and R. M. Pearse, “Perioperative medicine: the future of anaesthesia?” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 723–726, 2012.
[20]
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death and G. P. Findley, “Knowing the risk: a review of the peri-operative care of surgical patients,” NCEPOD, 2011.
[21]
J. B. Dahl and H. Kehlet, “Perioperative medicine: a new sub-speciality, or a multi-disciplinary strategy to improve perioperative management and outcome?” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 121–122, 2002.
