全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Spectrum of Quantum Dots Film for UV CCD

DOI: 10.1155/2013/803907

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A new kind of UV-responsive film with quantum dots (QDs) fabricated by a spin-coating method is proposed in this paper. In a previous study, the monolayer QDs film is deposited onto fused silica slides by the spin-coating way, which has some luminous problem. The introduction of composite QDs coating which adds PEDOT:PSS and poly-TPD films to the monolayer QDs film is found to have excellent performance. The reason can be that PEDOT:PSS and poly-TPD weaken the scattering and enhance the emitting of quantum dot fluorescence. The intensity of photoluminescence (PL) for composite QDs coating is dozens of times stronger than that for monolayer QDs film. Experiment results show that this composite coating has excellent fluorescent properties and emits a blue purple glow together a wide excitation spectrum field from 190?nm to 300?nm. The spectrum of the composite coating matches accurately with the detected zone of CCD, which achieves an outstanding UV-responsive coating for conventional silicon-based image sensors. 1. Introduction Silicon-based imaging detector CCD has been widely used in the scientific fields. But the typical CCD image sensors are not sensitive to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, because the penetration depth of UV photons can only reach about 2?nm in a polysilicon gate material with thickness of 1?μm [1]. Therefore researchers from all over the world have quested the method of enhancing the UV response of the CCD. In order to enhance the UV response of CCD detectors, a kind of UV-responsive film has been coated on the surface of CCD, which could absorb the UV radiation and reemit it in the visible spectrum where photons can penetrate the gate material. This method is very useful since it does not require change the structure of the typical CCD to be changed, and the production engineering will be simplified [2]. The research was started in the UV-responsive film abroad since 1980s. According to the used materials, the conversion film can be divided into two categories—organic film and inorganic one. Organic conversion coating technology is relatively mature, with various products invented. However, this kind of film has a fatal weakness that the degradation of organic molecules in the UV radiation is very fast. In the light of illumination for 1?μW/cm2, the organic molecules degrade exponentially with the rate highly up to 3% [3–5]. Moreover, because of the organic nature of organic molecules and their low melting and boiling points, stability of these films has also been in question. Inorganic fluorescent material is usually composed by rare

References

[1]  W. A. R. Franks, M. J. Kiik, and A. Nathan, “UV-responsive CCD image sensors with enhanced inorganic phosphor coatings,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 352–358, 2003.
[2]  G. Naletto, G. Tondello, G. Bonanno, R. Di Benedetto, and S. Scuderi, “Response analysis in the 300- to 2500-(angstrom) spectral range of ultraviolet-enhanced charge-coupled devices,” Optical Engineering, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 2544–2552, 1994.
[3]  D. W. Zhang, X. Tian, Y. S. Huang, Z. J. Ni, and S. L. Zhuang, “Preparation and spectral characterization of Lumogen coatings for UV-responsive CCD image sensors,” Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1171–1174, 2010.
[4]  A. M. Damento, A. A. Barcellos, and V. W. Schempp, “Stability of lumogen films on CCDs,” in Charge-Coupled Devices and Solid State Optical Sensors V, vol. 2415 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 204–210, 1995.
[5]  A. Deslandesa, A. B. Wedding, S. R. Clarke, J. G. Matisons, and J. S. Quinton, “Characterisation of PVD Lumogen films for wavelength conversion applications,” in Smart Structures, Devices, and Systems II, vol. 5649 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 616–626, 2005.
[6]  W. A. R. Franks, M. J. Kiik, and A. Nathan, “Inorganic phosphor coatings for UV-responsive CCD image sensors,” in Sensors and Camera Systems for Scientific, Industrial, and Digital Photography Applications, vol. 3965 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 33–41, 2000.
[7]  H. Huang, A. Dorn, G. P. Nair, V. Bulovi?, and M. G. Bawendi, “Bias-induced photoluminescence quenching of single colloidal quantum dots embedded in organic semiconductors,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 3781–3786, 2007.
[8]  B. Tomlin and Y. Wang, “Pricing and operational recourse in coproduction systems,” Management Science, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 522–537, 2008.
[9]  L. A. DeLouise and H. Ouyang, “Photoinduced fluorescence enhancement and energy transfer effects of quantum dots porous silicon,” Physica Status Solidi C, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1729–1735, 2009.
[10]  P. O. Anikeeva, C. F. Madigan, S. A. Coe-Sullivan, J. S. Steckel, M. G. Bawendi, and V. Bulovi?, “Photoluminescence of CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots enhanced by energy transfer from a phosphorescent donor,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 424, no. 1–3, pp. 120–125, 2006.
[11]  B. Ullrich, X. Y. Xiao, and G. J. Brown, “Photoluminescence of PbS quantum dots on semi-insulating GaAs,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 108, no. 1, Article ID 013525, 2010.
[12]  J. Yuan, W. Guo, and E. Wang, “Utilizing a CdTe quantum dots-enzyme hybrid system for the determination of both phenolic compounds and hydrogen peroxide,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1141–1145, 2008.
[13]  J. S. Biteen, N. S. Lewis, H. A. Atwater, H. Mertens, and A. Polman, “Spectral tuning of plasmon-enhanced silicon quantum dot luminescence,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, no. 13, Article ID 131109, 3 pages, 2006.
[14]  B. Liang, A. Lin, N. Pavarelli et al., “GaSb/GaAs type-II quantum dots grown by droplet epitaxy,” Nanotechnology, vol. 20, no. 45, Article ID 455604, 2009.
[15]  M. Winger, T. Volz, G. Tarel et al., “Explanation of photon correlations in the far-off-resonance optical emission from a quantum-dot-cavity system,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 20, Article ID 207403, 2009.
[16]  I. L. Medintz, L. Berti, T. Pons et al., “A reactive peptidic linker for self-assembling hybrid quantum dot-DNA bioconjugates,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1741–1748, 2007.
[17]  Y. Zhang, L. Mi, P. N. Wang et al., “Photoluminescence decay dynamics of ThiolCapped CdTe quantum dots in living cells under microexcitation,” Small, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 777–780, 2008.
[18]  M. Haridas, L. N. Tripathi, and J. K. Basu, “Photoluminescence enhancement and quenching in metal-semiconductor quantum dot hybrid arrays,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 98, no. 6, Article ID 063305, 2011.
[19]  Z. Zhao, T. M. Dansereau, M. A. Petrukhina, and M. A. Carpenter, “Nanopore-array-dispersed semiconductor quantum dots as nanosensors for gas detection,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 97, no. 11, Article ID 113105, 2010.
[20]  B. Ullrich, X. Y. Xiao, and G. J. Brown, “Photoluminescence of PbS quantum dots on semi-insulating GaAs,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 108, no. 1, Article ID 013525, 2010.
[21]  D. Richter, R. Ro?bach, W. M. Schulz et al., “Low-density InP quantum dots embedded in Ga0.51 In0.49 P with high optical quality realized by a strain inducing layer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 97, no. 6, Article ID 063107, 2010.

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133