全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Quantitative Analysis on Two RFS-Based Filtering Methods for Multicell Tracking

DOI: 10.1155/2014/495765

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Multiobject filters developed from the theory of random finite sets (RFS) have recently become well-known methods for solving multiobject tracking problem. In this paper, we present two RFS-based filtering methods, Gaussian mixture probability hypothesis density (GM-PHD) filter and multi-Bernoulli filter, to quantitatively analyze their performance on tracking multiple cells in a series of low-contrast image sequences. The GM-PHD filter, under linear Gaussian assumptions on the cell dynamics and birth process, applies the PHD recursion to propagate the posterior intensity in an analytic form, while the multi-Bernoulli filter estimates the multitarget posterior density through propagating the parameters of a multi-Bernoulli RFS that approximates the posterior density of multitarget RFS. Numerous performance comparisons between the two RFS-based methods are carried out on two real cell images sequences and demonstrate that both yield satisfactory results that are in good agreement with manual tracking method. 1. Introduction In previous related research in the field of medicine and biology, people often use manual visual inspection to observe living cells behaviors, such as the moving velocity and the density of cell population. Manual analysis methods always are limited by many challenges including large volume of image data and tedious manual operations. Therefore, it is of great significance to find an automatic and reliable way to track multiple cells. Over the last decades, many automatic tracking methods have been developed with rapid development of processing and computer vision technologies. Furthermore, numerous applications have been found for analyzing time-lapse cell microscopy imagery including fluorescent image [1, 2] and nonstaining cell image [3]. In the field of cell tracking, automatic and accurate tracking needs to overcome problems that mainly stem from two factors: cell factors such as population size, mitosis, and shape variability and imaging factors such as level of noise, image resolution ratio, and image contrast. The main objective of cell motion analysis is to determine the number of cells and the state of each cell, and visual multicell tracking methods can be divided into two categories, deterministic methods and stochastic methods. Deterministic methods usually handle the detections and tracking tasks separately [4–7], but tracking may fail under problematic imaging conditions such as large cell density, cell division events, or segmentation errors. Stochastic methods mostly fall in the category of Bayesian framework, and

References

[1]  Q. Wen, J. Gao, and K. Luby-Phelps, “Multiple interacting subcellular structure tracking by sequential Monte Carlo method,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM '07), pp. 437–442, November 2007.
[2]  I. Smal, W. Niessen, and E. Meijering, “A new detection scheme for multiple object tracking in fluorescence microscopy by joint probabilistic data association filtering,” in Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro (ISBI '08), pp. 264–267, Paris, France, May 2008.
[3]  O. Debeir, P. V. Ham, R. Kiss, and C. Decaestecker, “Tracking of migrating cells under phase-contrast video microscopy with combined mean-shift processes,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 697–711, 2005.
[4]  X. Yang, H. Li, and X. Zhou, “Nuclei segmentation using marker-controlled watershed, tracking using mean-shift, and Kalman filter in time-lapse microscopy,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 2405–2414, 2006.
[5]  C. Zimmer and J.-C. Olivo-Marin, “Coupled parametric active contours,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1838–1842, 2005.
[6]  N. Ray, S. T. Acton, and K. Ley, “Tracking leukocytes in vivo with shape and size constrained active contours,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1222–1235, 2002.
[7]  D. P. Mukherjee, N. Ray, and S. T. Acton, “Level set analysis for leukocyte detection and tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 562–572, 2004.
[8]  R. Hoseinnezhad, B.-N. Vo, B.-T. Vo, and D. Suter, “Visual tracking of numerous targets via multi-Bernoulli filtering of image data,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 45, no. 10, p. 3625, 2012.
[9]  B.-N. Vo, B.-T. Vo, N.-T. Pham, and D. Suter, “Joint detection and estimation of multiple objects from image observations,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 5129–5141, 2010.
[10]  R. P. S. Mahler, Statistical Multisource Multi-Target Information Fusion, Artech House, Norwood, Mass, USA, 2007.
[11]  B. Ristic, D. Clark, and B.-N. Vo, “Improved SMC implementation of the PHD filter,” in Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion '10), pp. 1–8, July 2010.
[12]  C. Ouyang, H.-B. Ji, and Z.-Q. Guo, “Extensions of the SMC-PHD filters for jump Markov systems,” Signal Processing, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1422–1430, 2012.
[13]  R. R. Juang, A. Levchenko, and P. Burlina, “Tracking cell motion using GM-PHD,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro (ISBI '09), pp. 1154–1157, July 2009.
[14]  B.-N. Vo and W.-K. Ma, “The Gaussian mixture probability hypothesis density filter,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 4091–4104, 2006.
[15]  Y.-D. Wang, J.-K. Wu, A. A. Kassim, and W. Huang, “Data-driven probability hypothesis density filter for visual tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1085–1095, 2008.
[16]  E. Maggio, M. Taj, and A. Cavallaro, “Efficient multitarget visual tracking using random finite sets,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1016–1027, 2008.
[17]  E. Pollard, A. Plyer, B. Pannetier, F. Champagnat, and G. Le Besnerais, “GM-PHD filters for multi-object tracking in uncalibrated aerial videos,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION '09), pp. 1171–1178, July 2009.
[18]  T. Wood, C. Yates, D. Wilkinson, and G. Rosser, “Simplified multi-target tracking using the PHD filter for microscopic video data,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 702–713, 2012.
[19]  S. H. Rezatofighi, S. Gould, B.-N. Vo, K. Mele, W. E. Hughes, and R. Hartley, “A multiple model probability hypothesis density tracker for time-lapse cell microscopy sequences,” Information Processing in Medical Imaging, vol. 7917, pp. 110–122, 2013.
[20]  R. P. S. Mahler, “Multitarget bayes filtering via first-order multitarget moments,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1152–1178, 2003.
[21]  A. Doucet, N. de Freitas, and N. Gordon, Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice, Springer, 2001.
[22]  K. Shafique and M. Shah, “A noniterative greedy algorithm for multiframe point correspondence,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 51–65, 2005.
[23]  D. Schuhmacher, B.-T. Vo, and B.-N. Vo, “A consistent metric for performance evaluation of multi-object filters,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 3447–3457, 2008.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133