全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Human Skeleton Model Based Dynamic Features for Walking Speed Invariant Gait Recognition

DOI: 10.1155/2014/484320

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Humans are able to recognize small number of people they know well by the way they walk. This ability represents basic motivation for using human gait as the means for biometric identification. Such biometrics can be captured at public places from a distance without subject's collaboration, awareness, and even consent. Although current approaches give encouraging results, we are still far from effective use in real-life applications. In general, methods set various constraints to circumvent the influence of covariate factors like changes of walking speed, view, clothing, footwear, and object carrying, that have negative impact on recognition performance. In this paper we propose a skeleton model based gait recognition system focusing on modelling gait dynamics and eliminating the influence of subjects appearance on recognition. Furthermore, we tackle the problem of walking speed variation and propose space transformation and feature fusion that mitigates its influence on recognition performance. With the evaluation on OU-ISIR gait dataset, we demonstrate state of the art performance of proposed methods. 1. Introduction Psychological studies showed that humans have small but significant ability to recognize people they know well by their gait. This ability has encouraged the research for using gait as the means of biometric identification. Early studies on Point Light Displays (PLD) [1], which enable isolated study of motion by removing all other contexts from observed subjects, confirmed this ability. Commonly used biometrics based on fingerprints, face, iris, and so forth have two obvious deficiencies. They perform badly at low image resolutions and need active user participation. Gait on the other hand does not suffer from these deficiencies. It can be captured with ordinary equipment without individual’s awareness or even consent. The main deficiencies of such biometrics are the unknown level of uniqueness and covariate factors that change gait characteristics. These can be external (changes of view, direction, or speed of movement, illumination conditions, weather, clothing, footwear, terrain, etc.) or internal (changes due to illness, injuries, ageing, pregnancy, etc.). Problems are also caused by uncertain measurements, occlusions, and the use of noninvasive acquiring techniques (without sensors or markers). All these negatively influence the recognition performance in real-life environment, which is still too weak for efficient use in biometry. Methods can be categorized into two main groups. Model based approaches [2–5] build the model of human

References

[1]  G. Johansson, “Visual motion perception,” Scientific American, vol. 232, no. 6, pp. 76–88, 1976.
[2]  G. Ariyanto and M. S. Nixon, “Model-based 3D Gait biometrics,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB '11), pp. 354–359, October 2011.
[3]  J.-H. Yoo and M. S. Nixon, “Automated markerless analysis of human Gait motion for recognition and classification,” ETRI Journal, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 259–266, 2011.
[4]  T. Yu and J.-H. Zou, “Automatic human Gait imitation and recognition in 3D from monocular video with an uncalibrated camera,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 563864, pp. 1–35, 2012.
[5]  H. Lu, K. N. Plataniotis, and A. N. Venetsanopoulos, “A full-body layered deformable model for automatic model-based Gait recognition,” Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2008, Article ID 261317, pp. 1–14, 2008.
[6]  Z. Liu and S. Sarkar, “Simplest representation yet for Gait recognition: averaged silhouette,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '04), vol. 4, pp. 211–214, August 2004.
[7]  S. Sarkar, P. J. Phillips, Z. Liu, I. R. Vega, P. Grother, and K. W. Bowyer, “The humanID Gait challenge problem: data sets, performance, and analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 162–177, 2005.
[8]  R. Tanawongsuwan and A. Bobick, “Modelling the effects of walking speed on appearance-based Gait recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '04), pp. II783–II790, July 2004.
[9]  Z. Wang, X. Sun, L. Sun, and Y. Huang, “Manifold adaptive kernel semisupervised discriminant analysis for Gait recognition,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 2013, pp. 1–12, 2013.
[10]  M. Peternel and A. Leonardis, “Visual learning and recognition of a probabilistic spatio-temporal model of cyclic human locomotion,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '04), pp. 146–149, August 2004.
[11]  W. Stone and M. Skubic, “Capturing habitual, in-home Gait parameter trends using an inexpensive depth camera,” in Proceedings of the International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 5106–5109, 2012.
[12]  T. Banerjee, J. M. Keller, and M. Skubic, “Resident identification using kinect depth image data and fuzzy clustering techniques,” in Proceedings of the International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 5102–5105, 2012.
[13]  J. Kovac and P. Peer, “Transformation basedWalking speed normalization for Gait recognition,” KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 2690–2701, 2013.
[14]  Z. Liu and S. Sarkar, “Improved Gait recognition by Gait dynamics normalization,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 863–876, 2006.
[15]  S. Lee, Y. Liu, and R. Collins, “Shape variation-based frieze pattern for robust Gait recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '07), June 2007.
[16]  A. Veeraraghavan, A. Srivastava, A. K. Roy-Chowdhury, and R. Chellappa, “Rate-invariant recognition of humans and their activities,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1326–1339, 2009.
[17]  T. Kobayashi and N. Otsu, “Three-way auto-correlation approach to motion recognition,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 212–221, 2009.
[18]  A. Tsuji, Y. Makihara, and Y. Yagi, “Silhouette transformation based on walking speed for Gait identification,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '10), pp. 717–722, June 2010.
[19]  W. Kusakunniran, Q. Wu, J. Zhang, and H. Li, “Speed-invariant Gait recognition based on procrustes shape analysis using higher-order shape configuration,” in Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '11), pp. 545–548, September 2011.
[20]  W. Kusakunniran, Q. Wu, J. Zhang, and H. Li, “Differential composition model,” Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1654–1668, 2012.
[21]  L. Zappella, X. Llado, and J. Salvi, New Trends in Motion Segmentation, Pattern Recognition, Edited by P.-Y. Yin, InTech, 2009.
[22]  D. A. Winter, The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, John Wiley & Sons, 1990.
[23]  X. Huang and N. Boulgouris, “Model-based human Gait recognition using fusion of features,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 1469–1472, 2009.
[24]  Y. Makihara, H. Mannami, A. Tsuji et al., “The OU-ISIR Gait database comprising the Treadmill dataset,” IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications, vol. 4, pp. 53–62, 2012.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413