全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Scale-Free Networks with the Same Degree Distribution: Different Structural Properties

DOI: 10.1155/2013/234180

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

We have analysed some structural properties of scale-free networks with the same degree distribution. Departing from a degree distribution obtained from the Barabási-Albert (BA) algorithm, networks were generated using four additional different algorithms (Molloy-Reed, Kalisky, and two new models named A and B) besides the BA algorithm itself. For each network, we have calculated the following structural measures: average degree of the nearest neighbours, central point dominance, clustering coefficient, the Pearson correlation coefficient, and global efficiency. We found that different networks with the same degree distribution may have distinct structural properties. In particular, model B generates decentralized networks with a larger number of components, a smaller giant component size, and a low global efficiency when compared to the other algorithms, especially compared to the centralized BA networks that have all vertices in a single component, with a medium to high global efficiency. The other three models generate networks with intermediate characteristics between B and BA models. A consequence of this finding is that the dynamics of different phenomena on these networks may differ considerably. 1. Introduction The degree distribution , defined as the fraction of vertices in the network with degree , is an important property of a complex network. In particular, the degree distribution of many real world networks [1–4] was accurately fitted by a scale-free (power-law) degree distribution where is a scaling parameter. A power-law degree distribution was observed, for instance, in networks of animal movements [5]. Such networks are examples of networks whose degree distribution may be either estimated using a questionnaire in which the number of contacting farm holdings is assessed or through the analysis of animal movement records. When there is a large number of farm holdings in the network and a data bank of animal movements is not available, we might assess the degree distribution using a questionnaire. From the estimated degree distribution, one may be interested in recovering approximately the real network to simulate, for instance, the potential spread of infectious diseases such as foot-and-mouth disease and bovine brucellosis, for which the network of animal movements is an important means of dissemination [6–8]. Nevertheless, the process of recovering a possible real network from the estimated degree distribution may lead to a misleading inference. The presence of a scale-free degree distribution does not guarantee that the recovered

References

[1]  G. Caldarelli, Scale-Free Networks, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007.
[2]  L. A. N. Amaral, A. Scala, M. Barthélémy, and H. E. Stanley, “Classes of small-world networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 21, pp. 11149–11152, 2000.
[3]  H. Jeong, “Complex scale-free networks,” Physica A, vol. 321, pp. 226–237, 2003.
[4]  A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman, “Power-law distributions in empirical data,” SIAM Review, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 661–703, 2009.
[5]  M. Bigras-Poulin, R. A. Thompson, M. Chriel, S. Mortensen, and M. Greiner, “Network analysis of Danish cattle industry trade patterns as an evaluation of risk potential for disease spread,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 76, no. 1-2, pp. 11–39, 2006.
[6]  J. C. Gibbens, C. E. Sharpe, J. W. Wilesmith et al., “Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months,” Veterinary Record, vol. 149, no. 24, pp. 729–743, 2001.
[7]  R. L. Negreiros, M. Amaku, R. A. Dias, F. Ferreira, J. C. M. Cavalléro, and J. S. F. Neto, “Spatial clustering analysis of the foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Mato Grosso do Sul state, Brazil—2005,” Ciência Rural, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2609–2613, 2009.
[8]  R. A. Dias, V. S. P. Gon?alves, V. C. F. Figueiredo et al., “Situa??o epidemiológica da brucelose bovina no Estado de S?o Paulo [Epidemiological situation of bovine brucellosis in the State of S?o Paulo, Brazil],” Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, vol. 61, supplement 1, pp. 118–125, 2009.
[9]  R. Albert and A. L. Barabási, “Statistical mechanics of complex networks,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 47–97, 2002.
[10]  V. Batagelj and U. Brandes, “Efficient generation of large random networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 71, no. 3, Article ID 036113, 5 pages, 2005.
[11]  L. F. Costa, F. A. Rodrigues, G. Travieso, and P. R. Villas Boas, “Characterization of complex networks: a survey of measurements,” Advances in Physics, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 167–242, 2007.
[12]  L. C. Freeman, “A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness,” Sociometry, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 1977.
[13]  D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, “Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks,” Nature, vol. 393, no. 6684, pp. 440–442, 1988.
[14]  M. E. J. Newman, “Assortative mixing in networks,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, no. 20, Article ID 208701, 4 pages, 2002.
[15]  V. Latora and M. Marchiori, “Efficient behavior of small-world networks,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 19, Article ID 198701, 4 pages, 2001.
[16]  G. Csardi and T. Nepusz, “The igraph software package for complex network research,” International Journal Complex Systems, no. 1695, pp. 1–9, 2006.
[17]  T. Kalisky, R. Cohen, D. ben-Avraham, and S. Havlin, “Tomography and stability of complex networks,” Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 650, pp. 3–34, 2004.
[18]  R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2012, http://www.R-project.org/.
[19]  D. Bates and M. Maechler, “Matrix: sparse and dense matrix classes and methods,” http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=Matrix.
[20]  C. T. Butts, “Network: a package for managing relational data in R,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1–36, 2008.
[21]  R. Ossada, J. H. H. Grisi-Filho, M. Amaku, and F. Ferreira, “Modeling the dynamics of infectious diseases in scale-free networks with the same degree distribution,” submitted.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413